Cargando…

Effects of Fe(OH)(3) and MnO(2) Flocs on Iron/Manganese Removal and Fouling in Aerated Submerged Membrane Systems

Many treatment methods are used to remove iron and manganese from water. Aeration and membrane filtration are two of these methods. In this study, Fe(2+) and Mn(2+) removal by aeration with different catalysts and instead of simple membrane filtration applied in other studies, the aerated-submerged...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Türkoğlu Demirkol, Güler, Çelik, Suna Özden, Güneş Durak, Sevgi, Acarer, Seren, Çetin, Ender, Akarçay Demir, Sultan, Tüfekci, Neşe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8512643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34641017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13193201
_version_ 1784583043938254848
author Türkoğlu Demirkol, Güler
Çelik, Suna Özden
Güneş Durak, Sevgi
Acarer, Seren
Çetin, Ender
Akarçay Demir, Sultan
Tüfekci, Neşe
author_facet Türkoğlu Demirkol, Güler
Çelik, Suna Özden
Güneş Durak, Sevgi
Acarer, Seren
Çetin, Ender
Akarçay Demir, Sultan
Tüfekci, Neşe
author_sort Türkoğlu Demirkol, Güler
collection PubMed
description Many treatment methods are used to remove iron and manganese from water. Aeration and membrane filtration are two of these methods. In this study, Fe(2+) and Mn(2+) removal by aeration with different catalysts and instead of simple membrane filtration applied in other studies, the aerated-submerged membrane systems were evaluated separately. When Fe(OH)(3) was applied in the aeration step and complete oxidation of Fe(2+) was obtained after 27 min, while complete Mn(2+) oxidation was obtained in 76 min. However, when MnO(2) was applied in the aeration step, complete oxidation of Fe(2+) and Mn(2+) was relatively slow (36 and 110 min, respectively). According to the results obtained from the aerated membrane system, Fe(2+) and Mn(2+) removal were extended by Fe(OH)(3) via adsorption/surface oxidation. It is clearly shown from the flux, resistance results, scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared (FT/IR) spectroscopy observation that manganese oxides were deposited mainly in membrane pores forming membrane fouling by small flocs, while iron oxide particles were deposited on the membrane surface. Although the flux performance of PT PES membrane was higher than HF PP membrane, fouling resistance of HF PP membrane was higher than PT PES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8512643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85126432021-10-14 Effects of Fe(OH)(3) and MnO(2) Flocs on Iron/Manganese Removal and Fouling in Aerated Submerged Membrane Systems Türkoğlu Demirkol, Güler Çelik, Suna Özden Güneş Durak, Sevgi Acarer, Seren Çetin, Ender Akarçay Demir, Sultan Tüfekci, Neşe Polymers (Basel) Article Many treatment methods are used to remove iron and manganese from water. Aeration and membrane filtration are two of these methods. In this study, Fe(2+) and Mn(2+) removal by aeration with different catalysts and instead of simple membrane filtration applied in other studies, the aerated-submerged membrane systems were evaluated separately. When Fe(OH)(3) was applied in the aeration step and complete oxidation of Fe(2+) was obtained after 27 min, while complete Mn(2+) oxidation was obtained in 76 min. However, when MnO(2) was applied in the aeration step, complete oxidation of Fe(2+) and Mn(2+) was relatively slow (36 and 110 min, respectively). According to the results obtained from the aerated membrane system, Fe(2+) and Mn(2+) removal were extended by Fe(OH)(3) via adsorption/surface oxidation. It is clearly shown from the flux, resistance results, scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared (FT/IR) spectroscopy observation that manganese oxides were deposited mainly in membrane pores forming membrane fouling by small flocs, while iron oxide particles were deposited on the membrane surface. Although the flux performance of PT PES membrane was higher than HF PP membrane, fouling resistance of HF PP membrane was higher than PT PES. MDPI 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8512643/ /pubmed/34641017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13193201 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Türkoğlu Demirkol, Güler
Çelik, Suna Özden
Güneş Durak, Sevgi
Acarer, Seren
Çetin, Ender
Akarçay Demir, Sultan
Tüfekci, Neşe
Effects of Fe(OH)(3) and MnO(2) Flocs on Iron/Manganese Removal and Fouling in Aerated Submerged Membrane Systems
title Effects of Fe(OH)(3) and MnO(2) Flocs on Iron/Manganese Removal and Fouling in Aerated Submerged Membrane Systems
title_full Effects of Fe(OH)(3) and MnO(2) Flocs on Iron/Manganese Removal and Fouling in Aerated Submerged Membrane Systems
title_fullStr Effects of Fe(OH)(3) and MnO(2) Flocs on Iron/Manganese Removal and Fouling in Aerated Submerged Membrane Systems
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Fe(OH)(3) and MnO(2) Flocs on Iron/Manganese Removal and Fouling in Aerated Submerged Membrane Systems
title_short Effects of Fe(OH)(3) and MnO(2) Flocs on Iron/Manganese Removal and Fouling in Aerated Submerged Membrane Systems
title_sort effects of fe(oh)(3) and mno(2) flocs on iron/manganese removal and fouling in aerated submerged membrane systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8512643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34641017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13193201
work_keys_str_mv AT turkogludemirkolguler effectsoffeoh3andmno2flocsonironmanganeseremovalandfoulinginaeratedsubmergedmembranesystems
AT celiksunaozden effectsoffeoh3andmno2flocsonironmanganeseremovalandfoulinginaeratedsubmergedmembranesystems
AT gunesduraksevgi effectsoffeoh3andmno2flocsonironmanganeseremovalandfoulinginaeratedsubmergedmembranesystems
AT acarerseren effectsoffeoh3andmno2flocsonironmanganeseremovalandfoulinginaeratedsubmergedmembranesystems
AT cetinender effectsoffeoh3andmno2flocsonironmanganeseremovalandfoulinginaeratedsubmergedmembranesystems
AT akarcaydemirsultan effectsoffeoh3andmno2flocsonironmanganeseremovalandfoulinginaeratedsubmergedmembranesystems
AT tufekcinese effectsoffeoh3andmno2flocsonironmanganeseremovalandfoulinginaeratedsubmergedmembranesystems