Cargando…

Pose2Sim: An End-to-End Workflow for 3D Markerless Sports Kinematics—Part 1: Robustness

Being able to capture relevant information about elite athletes’ movement “in the wild” is challenging, especially because reference marker-based approaches hinder natural movement and are highly sensitive to environmental conditions. We propose Pose2Sim, a markerless kinematics workflow that uses O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pagnon, David, Domalain, Mathieu, Reveret, Lionel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8512754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640862
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21196530
_version_ 1784583072447987712
author Pagnon, David
Domalain, Mathieu
Reveret, Lionel
author_facet Pagnon, David
Domalain, Mathieu
Reveret, Lionel
author_sort Pagnon, David
collection PubMed
description Being able to capture relevant information about elite athletes’ movement “in the wild” is challenging, especially because reference marker-based approaches hinder natural movement and are highly sensitive to environmental conditions. We propose Pose2Sim, a markerless kinematics workflow that uses OpenPose 2D pose detections from multiple views as inputs, identifies the person of interest, robustly triangulates joint coordinates from calibrated cameras, and feeds those to a 3D inverse kinematic full-body OpenSim model in order to compute biomechanically congruent joint angles. We assessed the robustness of this workflow when facing simulated challenging conditions: (Im) degrades image quality (11-pixel Gaussian blur and 0.5 gamma compression); (4c) uses few cameras (4 vs. 8); and (Cal) introduces calibration errors (1 cm vs. perfect calibration). Three physical activities were investigated: walking, running, and cycling. When averaged over all joint angles, stride-to-stride standard deviations lay between 1.7° and 3.2° for all conditions and tasks, and mean absolute errors (compared to the reference condition—Ref) ranged between 0.35° and 1.6°. For walking, errors in the sagittal plane were: 1.5°, 0.90°, 0.19° for (Im), (4c), and (Cal), respectively. In conclusion, Pose2Sim provides a simple and robust markerless kinematics analysis from a network of calibrated cameras.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8512754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85127542021-10-14 Pose2Sim: An End-to-End Workflow for 3D Markerless Sports Kinematics—Part 1: Robustness Pagnon, David Domalain, Mathieu Reveret, Lionel Sensors (Basel) Article Being able to capture relevant information about elite athletes’ movement “in the wild” is challenging, especially because reference marker-based approaches hinder natural movement and are highly sensitive to environmental conditions. We propose Pose2Sim, a markerless kinematics workflow that uses OpenPose 2D pose detections from multiple views as inputs, identifies the person of interest, robustly triangulates joint coordinates from calibrated cameras, and feeds those to a 3D inverse kinematic full-body OpenSim model in order to compute biomechanically congruent joint angles. We assessed the robustness of this workflow when facing simulated challenging conditions: (Im) degrades image quality (11-pixel Gaussian blur and 0.5 gamma compression); (4c) uses few cameras (4 vs. 8); and (Cal) introduces calibration errors (1 cm vs. perfect calibration). Three physical activities were investigated: walking, running, and cycling. When averaged over all joint angles, stride-to-stride standard deviations lay between 1.7° and 3.2° for all conditions and tasks, and mean absolute errors (compared to the reference condition—Ref) ranged between 0.35° and 1.6°. For walking, errors in the sagittal plane were: 1.5°, 0.90°, 0.19° for (Im), (4c), and (Cal), respectively. In conclusion, Pose2Sim provides a simple and robust markerless kinematics analysis from a network of calibrated cameras. MDPI 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8512754/ /pubmed/34640862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21196530 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pagnon, David
Domalain, Mathieu
Reveret, Lionel
Pose2Sim: An End-to-End Workflow for 3D Markerless Sports Kinematics—Part 1: Robustness
title Pose2Sim: An End-to-End Workflow for 3D Markerless Sports Kinematics—Part 1: Robustness
title_full Pose2Sim: An End-to-End Workflow for 3D Markerless Sports Kinematics—Part 1: Robustness
title_fullStr Pose2Sim: An End-to-End Workflow for 3D Markerless Sports Kinematics—Part 1: Robustness
title_full_unstemmed Pose2Sim: An End-to-End Workflow for 3D Markerless Sports Kinematics—Part 1: Robustness
title_short Pose2Sim: An End-to-End Workflow for 3D Markerless Sports Kinematics—Part 1: Robustness
title_sort pose2sim: an end-to-end workflow for 3d markerless sports kinematics—part 1: robustness
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8512754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640862
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21196530
work_keys_str_mv AT pagnondavid pose2simanendtoendworkflowfor3dmarkerlesssportskinematicspart1robustness
AT domalainmathieu pose2simanendtoendworkflowfor3dmarkerlesssportskinematicspart1robustness
AT reveretlionel pose2simanendtoendworkflowfor3dmarkerlesssportskinematicspart1robustness