Cargando…

Biomechanical Aspects of Various Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Review

There have been considerable recent technological developments for implant overdenture attachments. This study presents an overview of the biomechanical and biomolecular aspects of various attachments for implant overdenture. Available articles on attachments for implant overdenture were reviewed fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mirchandani, Bharat, Zhou, Ting, Heboyan, Artak, Yodmongkol, Sirasa, Buranawat, Borvornwut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8512762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34641063
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13193248
_version_ 1784583074422456320
author Mirchandani, Bharat
Zhou, Ting
Heboyan, Artak
Yodmongkol, Sirasa
Buranawat, Borvornwut
author_facet Mirchandani, Bharat
Zhou, Ting
Heboyan, Artak
Yodmongkol, Sirasa
Buranawat, Borvornwut
author_sort Mirchandani, Bharat
collection PubMed
description There have been considerable recent technological developments for implant overdenture attachments. This study presents an overview of the biomechanical and biomolecular aspects of various attachments for implant overdenture. Available articles on attachments for implant overdenture were reviewed from January 1980 to August 2021 in the ScienceDirect, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Web of Science resources, and relevant studies were included in this study. We focused on the following topics: attachment systems, retention of various attachments, stress distribution with different attachments, the design and fabrication of attachments, digital techniques in overdenture attachments, and the effects of attachments in peri-implant health. We found that plastic resin is commonly used for ball and bar attachments, whereas nylon resin is commonly used in locator attachments. The locator system offers a valuable attachment option for implant-retained overdenture. Attachment retention reduces while lateral force increases with implant inclination in overdenture. The higher the retention of an overdenture attachment, the higher the transferred stresses. Additionally, clip loading produces more stress in implants and precision elements than bar-retained dentures. As such, we conclude that the ball and locator systems the best overdenture systems due to their superior tissue response, survival rate, and patient satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8512762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85127622021-10-14 Biomechanical Aspects of Various Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Review Mirchandani, Bharat Zhou, Ting Heboyan, Artak Yodmongkol, Sirasa Buranawat, Borvornwut Polymers (Basel) Review There have been considerable recent technological developments for implant overdenture attachments. This study presents an overview of the biomechanical and biomolecular aspects of various attachments for implant overdenture. Available articles on attachments for implant overdenture were reviewed from January 1980 to August 2021 in the ScienceDirect, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Web of Science resources, and relevant studies were included in this study. We focused on the following topics: attachment systems, retention of various attachments, stress distribution with different attachments, the design and fabrication of attachments, digital techniques in overdenture attachments, and the effects of attachments in peri-implant health. We found that plastic resin is commonly used for ball and bar attachments, whereas nylon resin is commonly used in locator attachments. The locator system offers a valuable attachment option for implant-retained overdenture. Attachment retention reduces while lateral force increases with implant inclination in overdenture. The higher the retention of an overdenture attachment, the higher the transferred stresses. Additionally, clip loading produces more stress in implants and precision elements than bar-retained dentures. As such, we conclude that the ball and locator systems the best overdenture systems due to their superior tissue response, survival rate, and patient satisfaction. MDPI 2021-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8512762/ /pubmed/34641063 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13193248 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mirchandani, Bharat
Zhou, Ting
Heboyan, Artak
Yodmongkol, Sirasa
Buranawat, Borvornwut
Biomechanical Aspects of Various Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Review
title Biomechanical Aspects of Various Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Review
title_full Biomechanical Aspects of Various Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Review
title_fullStr Biomechanical Aspects of Various Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Aspects of Various Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Review
title_short Biomechanical Aspects of Various Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Review
title_sort biomechanical aspects of various attachments for implant overdentures: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8512762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34641063
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13193248
work_keys_str_mv AT mirchandanibharat biomechanicalaspectsofvariousattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesareview
AT zhouting biomechanicalaspectsofvariousattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesareview
AT heboyanartak biomechanicalaspectsofvariousattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesareview
AT yodmongkolsirasa biomechanicalaspectsofvariousattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesareview
AT buranawatborvornwut biomechanicalaspectsofvariousattachmentsforimplantoverdenturesareview