Cargando…

Comparison of Three Commonly Used Genetic Markers for Detection of Leishmania Major: An Experimental Study

BACKGROUND: Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne disease caused by an intracellular protozoan parasite called Leishmania spp. Different species produce different clinical outcomes; the majority of cases are cutaneous forms. Leishmania major is one of the main causative agents of cutaneous leishmaniasis (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Behniafar, Hamed, Vaziri, Vahideh Moin, Tabaei, Seyyed Javad Seyyed, Taghipour, Niloofar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Research and Publications Office of Jimma University 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8512936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703171
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v31i4.6
_version_ 1784583117915291648
author Behniafar, Hamed
Vaziri, Vahideh Moin
Tabaei, Seyyed Javad Seyyed
Taghipour, Niloofar
author_facet Behniafar, Hamed
Vaziri, Vahideh Moin
Tabaei, Seyyed Javad Seyyed
Taghipour, Niloofar
author_sort Behniafar, Hamed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne disease caused by an intracellular protozoan parasite called Leishmania spp. Different species produce different clinical outcomes; the majority of cases are cutaneous forms. Leishmania major is one of the main causative agents of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). Various methods are being using to diagnose CL, including microscopic examination, culture, and molecular detection of the parasite genome. METHOD: In the current study, we tried to compare three common molecular markers, including Kinetoplast DNA (kDNA), Cytochrome b (Cyt b), and Internal transcribed space 1 (ITS1), for the detection of Leishmania major. After cultivation of standard strain of L. major MHOM/IR/75/ER in RPMI 1640, certain number of promastigotes was subjected to DNA extraction and different PCR reactions. RESULTS: The lowest number of the parasite (5 promastigotes) can be detected by kDNA-PCR, followed by Cyt b-PCR (10 promastigotes), and ITS1-PCR (50 promastigotes). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, kDNA-PCR was the most sensitive marker and may provide more reliable data in the initial screening, especially in false-negative results provided by parasitological methods due to the low number of parasites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8512936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Research and Publications Office of Jimma University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85129362021-10-25 Comparison of Three Commonly Used Genetic Markers for Detection of Leishmania Major: An Experimental Study Behniafar, Hamed Vaziri, Vahideh Moin Tabaei, Seyyed Javad Seyyed Taghipour, Niloofar Ethiop J Health Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne disease caused by an intracellular protozoan parasite called Leishmania spp. Different species produce different clinical outcomes; the majority of cases are cutaneous forms. Leishmania major is one of the main causative agents of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). Various methods are being using to diagnose CL, including microscopic examination, culture, and molecular detection of the parasite genome. METHOD: In the current study, we tried to compare three common molecular markers, including Kinetoplast DNA (kDNA), Cytochrome b (Cyt b), and Internal transcribed space 1 (ITS1), for the detection of Leishmania major. After cultivation of standard strain of L. major MHOM/IR/75/ER in RPMI 1640, certain number of promastigotes was subjected to DNA extraction and different PCR reactions. RESULTS: The lowest number of the parasite (5 promastigotes) can be detected by kDNA-PCR, followed by Cyt b-PCR (10 promastigotes), and ITS1-PCR (50 promastigotes). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, kDNA-PCR was the most sensitive marker and may provide more reliable data in the initial screening, especially in false-negative results provided by parasitological methods due to the low number of parasites. Research and Publications Office of Jimma University 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8512936/ /pubmed/34703171 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v31i4.6 Text en © 2021 Hamed B., et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Behniafar, Hamed
Vaziri, Vahideh Moin
Tabaei, Seyyed Javad Seyyed
Taghipour, Niloofar
Comparison of Three Commonly Used Genetic Markers for Detection of Leishmania Major: An Experimental Study
title Comparison of Three Commonly Used Genetic Markers for Detection of Leishmania Major: An Experimental Study
title_full Comparison of Three Commonly Used Genetic Markers for Detection of Leishmania Major: An Experimental Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Three Commonly Used Genetic Markers for Detection of Leishmania Major: An Experimental Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Three Commonly Used Genetic Markers for Detection of Leishmania Major: An Experimental Study
title_short Comparison of Three Commonly Used Genetic Markers for Detection of Leishmania Major: An Experimental Study
title_sort comparison of three commonly used genetic markers for detection of leishmania major: an experimental study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8512936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703171
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v31i4.6
work_keys_str_mv AT behniafarhamed comparisonofthreecommonlyusedgeneticmarkersfordetectionofleishmaniamajoranexperimentalstudy
AT vazirivahidehmoin comparisonofthreecommonlyusedgeneticmarkersfordetectionofleishmaniamajoranexperimentalstudy
AT tabaeiseyyedjavadseyyed comparisonofthreecommonlyusedgeneticmarkersfordetectionofleishmaniamajoranexperimentalstudy
AT taghipourniloofar comparisonofthreecommonlyusedgeneticmarkersfordetectionofleishmaniamajoranexperimentalstudy