Cargando…

Estimating Fuel Moisture in Grasslands Using UAV-Mounted Infrared and Visible Light Sensors

Predicting wildfire behavior is a complex task that has historically relied on empirical models. Physics-based fire models could improve predictions and have broad applicability, but these models require more detailed inputs, including spatially explicit estimates of fuel characteristics. One of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barber, Nastassia, Alvarado, Ernesto, Kane, Van R., Mell, William E., Moskal, L. Monika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640670
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21196350
_version_ 1784583130338820096
author Barber, Nastassia
Alvarado, Ernesto
Kane, Van R.
Mell, William E.
Moskal, L. Monika
author_facet Barber, Nastassia
Alvarado, Ernesto
Kane, Van R.
Mell, William E.
Moskal, L. Monika
author_sort Barber, Nastassia
collection PubMed
description Predicting wildfire behavior is a complex task that has historically relied on empirical models. Physics-based fire models could improve predictions and have broad applicability, but these models require more detailed inputs, including spatially explicit estimates of fuel characteristics. One of the most critical of these characteristics is fuel moisture. Obtaining moisture measurements with traditional destructive sampling techniques can be prohibitively time-consuming and extremely limited in spatial resolution. This study seeks to assess how effectively moisture in grasses can be estimated using reflectance in six wavelengths in the visible and infrared ranges. One hundred twenty 1 m-square field samples were collected in a western Washington grassland as well as overhead imagery in six wavelengths for the same area. Predictive models of vegetation moisture using existing vegetation indices and components from principal component analysis of the wavelengths were generated and compared. The best model, a linear model based on principal components and biomass, showed modest predictive power (r² = 0.45). This model performed better for the plots with both dominant grass species pooled than it did for each species individually. The presence of this correlation, especially given the limited moisture range of this study, suggests that further research using samples across the entire fire season could potentially produce effective models for estimating moisture in this type of ecosystem using unmanned aerial vehicles, even when more than one major species of grass is present. This approach would be a fast and flexible approach compared to traditional moisture measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8513011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85130112021-10-14 Estimating Fuel Moisture in Grasslands Using UAV-Mounted Infrared and Visible Light Sensors Barber, Nastassia Alvarado, Ernesto Kane, Van R. Mell, William E. Moskal, L. Monika Sensors (Basel) Article Predicting wildfire behavior is a complex task that has historically relied on empirical models. Physics-based fire models could improve predictions and have broad applicability, but these models require more detailed inputs, including spatially explicit estimates of fuel characteristics. One of the most critical of these characteristics is fuel moisture. Obtaining moisture measurements with traditional destructive sampling techniques can be prohibitively time-consuming and extremely limited in spatial resolution. This study seeks to assess how effectively moisture in grasses can be estimated using reflectance in six wavelengths in the visible and infrared ranges. One hundred twenty 1 m-square field samples were collected in a western Washington grassland as well as overhead imagery in six wavelengths for the same area. Predictive models of vegetation moisture using existing vegetation indices and components from principal component analysis of the wavelengths were generated and compared. The best model, a linear model based on principal components and biomass, showed modest predictive power (r² = 0.45). This model performed better for the plots with both dominant grass species pooled than it did for each species individually. The presence of this correlation, especially given the limited moisture range of this study, suggests that further research using samples across the entire fire season could potentially produce effective models for estimating moisture in this type of ecosystem using unmanned aerial vehicles, even when more than one major species of grass is present. This approach would be a fast and flexible approach compared to traditional moisture measurements. MDPI 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8513011/ /pubmed/34640670 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21196350 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Barber, Nastassia
Alvarado, Ernesto
Kane, Van R.
Mell, William E.
Moskal, L. Monika
Estimating Fuel Moisture in Grasslands Using UAV-Mounted Infrared and Visible Light Sensors
title Estimating Fuel Moisture in Grasslands Using UAV-Mounted Infrared and Visible Light Sensors
title_full Estimating Fuel Moisture in Grasslands Using UAV-Mounted Infrared and Visible Light Sensors
title_fullStr Estimating Fuel Moisture in Grasslands Using UAV-Mounted Infrared and Visible Light Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Fuel Moisture in Grasslands Using UAV-Mounted Infrared and Visible Light Sensors
title_short Estimating Fuel Moisture in Grasslands Using UAV-Mounted Infrared and Visible Light Sensors
title_sort estimating fuel moisture in grasslands using uav-mounted infrared and visible light sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34640670
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21196350
work_keys_str_mv AT barbernastassia estimatingfuelmoistureingrasslandsusinguavmountedinfraredandvisiblelightsensors
AT alvaradoernesto estimatingfuelmoistureingrasslandsusinguavmountedinfraredandvisiblelightsensors
AT kanevanr estimatingfuelmoistureingrasslandsusinguavmountedinfraredandvisiblelightsensors
AT mellwilliame estimatingfuelmoistureingrasslandsusinguavmountedinfraredandvisiblelightsensors
AT moskallmonika estimatingfuelmoistureingrasslandsusinguavmountedinfraredandvisiblelightsensors