Cargando…

Porcine small intestine graft for reconstruction of oral defects

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of porcine submucosal allograft (Biodesign Sinonasal Repair Graft [Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN]) in oral cavity and oropharynx reconstruction after ablative surgery. METHODS: We conducted a prospective and retrospective review of patients who und...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Membreno, Petra V., Eid, Anas A., Vanison, Christopher C., Gillespie, M. Boyd, Gleysteen, John P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.626
_version_ 1784583214909620224
author Membreno, Petra V.
Eid, Anas A.
Vanison, Christopher C.
Gillespie, M. Boyd
Gleysteen, John P.
author_facet Membreno, Petra V.
Eid, Anas A.
Vanison, Christopher C.
Gillespie, M. Boyd
Gleysteen, John P.
author_sort Membreno, Petra V.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of porcine submucosal allograft (Biodesign Sinonasal Repair Graft [Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN]) in oral cavity and oropharynx reconstruction after ablative surgery. METHODS: We conducted a prospective and retrospective review of patients who underwent Biodesign Sinonasal Repair Graft reconstruction for oral and oropharyngeal surgical defects at a single institution between 2018 and 2020. A total of 11 patients were included in the study. Data points included their perioperative medical and demographic data, immediate postoperative course, and follow‐up visits at 10 days and at 2 months. The clinicopathologic characteristics of their disease, postoperative esthetic, and functional outcomes were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven procedures have been performed, and all patients received Biodesign reconstruction either immediately after ablation or after they failed a previous reconstruction. None of the patients had bone exposure. The subsites included oral tongue (n = 6), floor of the mouth (n = 3), buccal mucosa (n = 1), and soft palate (n = 1). In all cases, the operations and the postoperative course were uneventful. The mean defect size was 22 cm(2). The median start of oral intake was at 2 days postoperatively. The Biodesign graft healed well in all patients with no total graft loss. There was one complication that required revision surgery due to obstruction of Wharton's duct by the Biodesign material. CONCLUSIONS: Biodesign can be a viable option for small and medium‐sized oral and oropharyngeal defects in patients who are medically unfit or do not want to undergo a free flap surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8513448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85134482021-10-18 Porcine small intestine graft for reconstruction of oral defects Membreno, Petra V. Eid, Anas A. Vanison, Christopher C. Gillespie, M. Boyd Gleysteen, John P. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Facial Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of porcine submucosal allograft (Biodesign Sinonasal Repair Graft [Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN]) in oral cavity and oropharynx reconstruction after ablative surgery. METHODS: We conducted a prospective and retrospective review of patients who underwent Biodesign Sinonasal Repair Graft reconstruction for oral and oropharyngeal surgical defects at a single institution between 2018 and 2020. A total of 11 patients were included in the study. Data points included their perioperative medical and demographic data, immediate postoperative course, and follow‐up visits at 10 days and at 2 months. The clinicopathologic characteristics of their disease, postoperative esthetic, and functional outcomes were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven procedures have been performed, and all patients received Biodesign reconstruction either immediately after ablation or after they failed a previous reconstruction. None of the patients had bone exposure. The subsites included oral tongue (n = 6), floor of the mouth (n = 3), buccal mucosa (n = 1), and soft palate (n = 1). In all cases, the operations and the postoperative course were uneventful. The mean defect size was 22 cm(2). The median start of oral intake was at 2 days postoperatively. The Biodesign graft healed well in all patients with no total graft loss. There was one complication that required revision surgery due to obstruction of Wharton's duct by the Biodesign material. CONCLUSIONS: Biodesign can be a viable option for small and medium‐sized oral and oropharyngeal defects in patients who are medically unfit or do not want to undergo a free flap surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8513448/ /pubmed/34667835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.626 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Facial Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery
Membreno, Petra V.
Eid, Anas A.
Vanison, Christopher C.
Gillespie, M. Boyd
Gleysteen, John P.
Porcine small intestine graft for reconstruction of oral defects
title Porcine small intestine graft for reconstruction of oral defects
title_full Porcine small intestine graft for reconstruction of oral defects
title_fullStr Porcine small intestine graft for reconstruction of oral defects
title_full_unstemmed Porcine small intestine graft for reconstruction of oral defects
title_short Porcine small intestine graft for reconstruction of oral defects
title_sort porcine small intestine graft for reconstruction of oral defects
topic Facial Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.626
work_keys_str_mv AT membrenopetrav porcinesmallintestinegraftforreconstructionoforaldefects
AT eidanasa porcinesmallintestinegraftforreconstructionoforaldefects
AT vanisonchristopherc porcinesmallintestinegraftforreconstructionoforaldefects
AT gillespiemboyd porcinesmallintestinegraftforreconstructionoforaldefects
AT gleysteenjohnp porcinesmallintestinegraftforreconstructionoforaldefects