Cargando…
Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam is safe in tympanoplasty or not. METHOD: In this randomized, double‐blind controlled clinical study, we included 100 patients between 18 and 60 years old, having perforation ≥50% of the tympanic mem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.670 |
_version_ | 1784583215859630080 |
---|---|
author | Faramarzi, Mohammad Kazemi, Tayebeh Shishegar, Mahmoud Zargerani, Omid Faramarzi, Ali Mohammadi, Tahereh Kooreshnia, Fatemeh Aghaei, Saleh Asadi, Mohammadali Babaei, Amirhossein |
author_facet | Faramarzi, Mohammad Kazemi, Tayebeh Shishegar, Mahmoud Zargerani, Omid Faramarzi, Ali Mohammadi, Tahereh Kooreshnia, Fatemeh Aghaei, Saleh Asadi, Mohammadali Babaei, Amirhossein |
author_sort | Faramarzi, Mohammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam is safe in tympanoplasty or not. METHOD: In this randomized, double‐blind controlled clinical study, we included 100 patients between 18 and 60 years old, having perforation ≥50% of the tympanic membrane and dry ear for at least 2 months who were a candidate for underlay tympanoplasty via postauricular approach. We used ciprofloxacin soaked gelfoam in the case group and betamethasone soaked gelfoam in the control group for packing the middle ear cavity and external auditory canal during their operation. The graft success rate and tympanogram after 6 months follow‐up period was considered as the primary outcome. Also, we evaluated the postoperative hearing results 6 months after the surgery as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Postoperative microscopic otoscopy showed a graft success rate of 100% (44/44) and 97.7% (42/43) in the case and control groups, respectively. The level of improvement between the two groups was not significant for air‐bone gap (ciprofloxacin: 9.01 ± 7.89 dB, betamethasone 5.31 ± 10.53 dB, P = .160), and speech reception thresholds (SRT; ciprofloxacin: 10.23 ± 8.62 dB, betamethasone 7.33 ± 12.60 dB, P = .260). 93.2% of all the ears in the case group and 81.4% of those in the control group achieved postoperative air‐bone gap within 20 dB, but the difference between them was not significant (P = .118). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the application of ciprofloxacin impregnated gelfoam in the middle ear, and the external auditory canal had no adverse effect on the graft success rate in tympanoplasty. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: 1b. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8513452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85134522021-10-18 Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial Faramarzi, Mohammad Kazemi, Tayebeh Shishegar, Mahmoud Zargerani, Omid Faramarzi, Ali Mohammadi, Tahereh Kooreshnia, Fatemeh Aghaei, Saleh Asadi, Mohammadali Babaei, Amirhossein Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam is safe in tympanoplasty or not. METHOD: In this randomized, double‐blind controlled clinical study, we included 100 patients between 18 and 60 years old, having perforation ≥50% of the tympanic membrane and dry ear for at least 2 months who were a candidate for underlay tympanoplasty via postauricular approach. We used ciprofloxacin soaked gelfoam in the case group and betamethasone soaked gelfoam in the control group for packing the middle ear cavity and external auditory canal during their operation. The graft success rate and tympanogram after 6 months follow‐up period was considered as the primary outcome. Also, we evaluated the postoperative hearing results 6 months after the surgery as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Postoperative microscopic otoscopy showed a graft success rate of 100% (44/44) and 97.7% (42/43) in the case and control groups, respectively. The level of improvement between the two groups was not significant for air‐bone gap (ciprofloxacin: 9.01 ± 7.89 dB, betamethasone 5.31 ± 10.53 dB, P = .160), and speech reception thresholds (SRT; ciprofloxacin: 10.23 ± 8.62 dB, betamethasone 7.33 ± 12.60 dB, P = .260). 93.2% of all the ears in the case group and 81.4% of those in the control group achieved postoperative air‐bone gap within 20 dB, but the difference between them was not significant (P = .118). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the application of ciprofloxacin impregnated gelfoam in the middle ear, and the external auditory canal had no adverse effect on the graft success rate in tympanoplasty. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: 1b. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8513452/ /pubmed/34667864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.670 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience Faramarzi, Mohammad Kazemi, Tayebeh Shishegar, Mahmoud Zargerani, Omid Faramarzi, Ali Mohammadi, Tahereh Kooreshnia, Fatemeh Aghaei, Saleh Asadi, Mohammadali Babaei, Amirhossein Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial |
title | Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial |
title_full | Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial |
title_short | Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial |
title_sort | does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? a randomized, double‐blind controlled trial |
topic | Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.670 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faramarzimohammad doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT kazemitayebeh doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT shishegarmahmoud doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT zargeraniomid doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT faramarziali doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT mohammaditahereh doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT kooreshniafatemeh doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT aghaeisaleh doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT asadimohammadali doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT babaeiamirhossein doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial |