Cargando…

Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam is safe in tympanoplasty or not. METHOD: In this randomized, double‐blind controlled clinical study, we included 100 patients between 18 and 60 years old, having perforation ≥50% of the tympanic mem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faramarzi, Mohammad, Kazemi, Tayebeh, Shishegar, Mahmoud, Zargerani, Omid, Faramarzi, Ali, Mohammadi, Tahereh, Kooreshnia, Fatemeh, Aghaei, Saleh, Asadi, Mohammadali, Babaei, Amirhossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.670
_version_ 1784583215859630080
author Faramarzi, Mohammad
Kazemi, Tayebeh
Shishegar, Mahmoud
Zargerani, Omid
Faramarzi, Ali
Mohammadi, Tahereh
Kooreshnia, Fatemeh
Aghaei, Saleh
Asadi, Mohammadali
Babaei, Amirhossein
author_facet Faramarzi, Mohammad
Kazemi, Tayebeh
Shishegar, Mahmoud
Zargerani, Omid
Faramarzi, Ali
Mohammadi, Tahereh
Kooreshnia, Fatemeh
Aghaei, Saleh
Asadi, Mohammadali
Babaei, Amirhossein
author_sort Faramarzi, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam is safe in tympanoplasty or not. METHOD: In this randomized, double‐blind controlled clinical study, we included 100 patients between 18 and 60 years old, having perforation ≥50% of the tympanic membrane and dry ear for at least 2 months who were a candidate for underlay tympanoplasty via postauricular approach. We used ciprofloxacin soaked gelfoam in the case group and betamethasone soaked gelfoam in the control group for packing the middle ear cavity and external auditory canal during their operation. The graft success rate and tympanogram after 6 months follow‐up period was considered as the primary outcome. Also, we evaluated the postoperative hearing results 6 months after the surgery as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Postoperative microscopic otoscopy showed a graft success rate of 100% (44/44) and 97.7% (42/43) in the case and control groups, respectively. The level of improvement between the two groups was not significant for air‐bone gap (ciprofloxacin: 9.01 ± 7.89 dB, betamethasone 5.31 ± 10.53 dB, P = .160), and speech reception thresholds (SRT; ciprofloxacin: 10.23 ± 8.62 dB, betamethasone 7.33 ± 12.60 dB, P = .260). 93.2% of all the ears in the case group and 81.4% of those in the control group achieved postoperative air‐bone gap within 20 dB, but the difference between them was not significant (P = .118). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the application of ciprofloxacin impregnated gelfoam in the middle ear, and the external auditory canal had no adverse effect on the graft success rate in tympanoplasty. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: 1b.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8513452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85134522021-10-18 Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial Faramarzi, Mohammad Kazemi, Tayebeh Shishegar, Mahmoud Zargerani, Omid Faramarzi, Ali Mohammadi, Tahereh Kooreshnia, Fatemeh Aghaei, Saleh Asadi, Mohammadali Babaei, Amirhossein Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam is safe in tympanoplasty or not. METHOD: In this randomized, double‐blind controlled clinical study, we included 100 patients between 18 and 60 years old, having perforation ≥50% of the tympanic membrane and dry ear for at least 2 months who were a candidate for underlay tympanoplasty via postauricular approach. We used ciprofloxacin soaked gelfoam in the case group and betamethasone soaked gelfoam in the control group for packing the middle ear cavity and external auditory canal during their operation. The graft success rate and tympanogram after 6 months follow‐up period was considered as the primary outcome. Also, we evaluated the postoperative hearing results 6 months after the surgery as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Postoperative microscopic otoscopy showed a graft success rate of 100% (44/44) and 97.7% (42/43) in the case and control groups, respectively. The level of improvement between the two groups was not significant for air‐bone gap (ciprofloxacin: 9.01 ± 7.89 dB, betamethasone 5.31 ± 10.53 dB, P = .160), and speech reception thresholds (SRT; ciprofloxacin: 10.23 ± 8.62 dB, betamethasone 7.33 ± 12.60 dB, P = .260). 93.2% of all the ears in the case group and 81.4% of those in the control group achieved postoperative air‐bone gap within 20 dB, but the difference between them was not significant (P = .118). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the application of ciprofloxacin impregnated gelfoam in the middle ear, and the external auditory canal had no adverse effect on the graft success rate in tympanoplasty. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: 1b. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8513452/ /pubmed/34667864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.670 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
Faramarzi, Mohammad
Kazemi, Tayebeh
Shishegar, Mahmoud
Zargerani, Omid
Faramarzi, Ali
Mohammadi, Tahereh
Kooreshnia, Fatemeh
Aghaei, Saleh
Asadi, Mohammadali
Babaei, Amirhossein
Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial
title Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial
title_full Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial
title_fullStr Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial
title_short Does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? A randomized, double‐blind controlled trial
title_sort does intraoperative ciprofloxacin‐soaked gelfoam have adverse effects on graft success rate? a randomized, double‐blind controlled trial
topic Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.670
work_keys_str_mv AT faramarzimohammad doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT kazemitayebeh doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT shishegarmahmoud doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT zargeraniomid doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT faramarziali doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT mohammaditahereh doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT kooreshniafatemeh doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT aghaeisaleh doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT asadimohammadali doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT babaeiamirhossein doesintraoperativeciprofloxacinsoakedgelfoamhaveadverseeffectsongraftsuccessratearandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial