Cargando…

Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG

OBJECTIVE: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals typically reflect a mixture of neuromagnetic fields, subject-related artifacts, external interference and sensor noise. Even inside a magnetically shielded room, external interference can be significantly stronger than brain signals. Methods such as si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helle, Liisa, Nenonen, Jukka, Larson, Eric, Simola, Juha, Parkkonen, Lauri, Taulu, Samu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33232223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2020.3040373
_version_ 1784583270672891904
author Helle, Liisa
Nenonen, Jukka
Larson, Eric
Simola, Juha
Parkkonen, Lauri
Taulu, Samu
author_facet Helle, Liisa
Nenonen, Jukka
Larson, Eric
Simola, Juha
Parkkonen, Lauri
Taulu, Samu
author_sort Helle, Liisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals typically reflect a mixture of neuromagnetic fields, subject-related artifacts, external interference and sensor noise. Even inside a magnetically shielded room, external interference can be significantly stronger than brain signals. Methods such as signal-space projection (SSP) and signal-space separation (SSS) have been developed to suppress this residual interference, but their performance might not be sufficient in cases of strong interference or when the sources of interference change over time. METHODS: Here we suggest a new method, extended signal-space separation (eSSS), which combines a physical model of the magnetic fields (as in SSS) with a statistical description of the interference (as in SSP). We demonstrate the performance of this method via simulations and experimental MEG data. RESULTS: The eSSS method clearly outperforms SSS and SSP in interference suppression regardless of the extent of a priori information available on the interference sources. We also show that the method does not cause location or amplitude bias in dipole modeling. CONCLUSION: Our eSSS method provides better data quality than SSP or SSS and can be readily combined with other SSS-based methods, such as spatiotemporal SSS or head movement compensation. Thus, eSSS extends and complements the interference suppression techniques currently available for MEG. SIGNIFICANCE: Due to its ability to suppress external interference to the level of sensor noise, eSSS can facilitate single-trial data analysis, exemplified in automated analysis of epileptic data. Such an enhanced suppression is especially important in environments with large interference fields.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8513798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85137982021-10-13 Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG Helle, Liisa Nenonen, Jukka Larson, Eric Simola, Juha Parkkonen, Lauri Taulu, Samu IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Article OBJECTIVE: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals typically reflect a mixture of neuromagnetic fields, subject-related artifacts, external interference and sensor noise. Even inside a magnetically shielded room, external interference can be significantly stronger than brain signals. Methods such as signal-space projection (SSP) and signal-space separation (SSS) have been developed to suppress this residual interference, but their performance might not be sufficient in cases of strong interference or when the sources of interference change over time. METHODS: Here we suggest a new method, extended signal-space separation (eSSS), which combines a physical model of the magnetic fields (as in SSS) with a statistical description of the interference (as in SSP). We demonstrate the performance of this method via simulations and experimental MEG data. RESULTS: The eSSS method clearly outperforms SSS and SSP in interference suppression regardless of the extent of a priori information available on the interference sources. We also show that the method does not cause location or amplitude bias in dipole modeling. CONCLUSION: Our eSSS method provides better data quality than SSP or SSS and can be readily combined with other SSS-based methods, such as spatiotemporal SSS or head movement compensation. Thus, eSSS extends and complements the interference suppression techniques currently available for MEG. SIGNIFICANCE: Due to its ability to suppress external interference to the level of sensor noise, eSSS can facilitate single-trial data analysis, exemplified in automated analysis of epileptic data. Such an enhanced suppression is especially important in environments with large interference fields. 2021-06-17 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8513798/ /pubmed/33232223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2020.3040373 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Helle, Liisa
Nenonen, Jukka
Larson, Eric
Simola, Juha
Parkkonen, Lauri
Taulu, Samu
Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG
title Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG
title_full Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG
title_fullStr Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG
title_full_unstemmed Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG
title_short Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG
title_sort extended signal-space separation method for improved interference suppression in meg
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33232223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2020.3040373
work_keys_str_mv AT helleliisa extendedsignalspaceseparationmethodforimprovedinterferencesuppressioninmeg
AT nenonenjukka extendedsignalspaceseparationmethodforimprovedinterferencesuppressioninmeg
AT larsoneric extendedsignalspaceseparationmethodforimprovedinterferencesuppressioninmeg
AT simolajuha extendedsignalspaceseparationmethodforimprovedinterferencesuppressioninmeg
AT parkkonenlauri extendedsignalspaceseparationmethodforimprovedinterferencesuppressioninmeg
AT taulusamu extendedsignalspaceseparationmethodforimprovedinterferencesuppressioninmeg