Cargando…
Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG
OBJECTIVE: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals typically reflect a mixture of neuromagnetic fields, subject-related artifacts, external interference and sensor noise. Even inside a magnetically shielded room, external interference can be significantly stronger than brain signals. Methods such as si...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33232223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2020.3040373 |
_version_ | 1784583270672891904 |
---|---|
author | Helle, Liisa Nenonen, Jukka Larson, Eric Simola, Juha Parkkonen, Lauri Taulu, Samu |
author_facet | Helle, Liisa Nenonen, Jukka Larson, Eric Simola, Juha Parkkonen, Lauri Taulu, Samu |
author_sort | Helle, Liisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals typically reflect a mixture of neuromagnetic fields, subject-related artifacts, external interference and sensor noise. Even inside a magnetically shielded room, external interference can be significantly stronger than brain signals. Methods such as signal-space projection (SSP) and signal-space separation (SSS) have been developed to suppress this residual interference, but their performance might not be sufficient in cases of strong interference or when the sources of interference change over time. METHODS: Here we suggest a new method, extended signal-space separation (eSSS), which combines a physical model of the magnetic fields (as in SSS) with a statistical description of the interference (as in SSP). We demonstrate the performance of this method via simulations and experimental MEG data. RESULTS: The eSSS method clearly outperforms SSS and SSP in interference suppression regardless of the extent of a priori information available on the interference sources. We also show that the method does not cause location or amplitude bias in dipole modeling. CONCLUSION: Our eSSS method provides better data quality than SSP or SSS and can be readily combined with other SSS-based methods, such as spatiotemporal SSS or head movement compensation. Thus, eSSS extends and complements the interference suppression techniques currently available for MEG. SIGNIFICANCE: Due to its ability to suppress external interference to the level of sensor noise, eSSS can facilitate single-trial data analysis, exemplified in automated analysis of epileptic data. Such an enhanced suppression is especially important in environments with large interference fields. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8513798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85137982021-10-13 Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG Helle, Liisa Nenonen, Jukka Larson, Eric Simola, Juha Parkkonen, Lauri Taulu, Samu IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Article OBJECTIVE: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals typically reflect a mixture of neuromagnetic fields, subject-related artifacts, external interference and sensor noise. Even inside a magnetically shielded room, external interference can be significantly stronger than brain signals. Methods such as signal-space projection (SSP) and signal-space separation (SSS) have been developed to suppress this residual interference, but their performance might not be sufficient in cases of strong interference or when the sources of interference change over time. METHODS: Here we suggest a new method, extended signal-space separation (eSSS), which combines a physical model of the magnetic fields (as in SSS) with a statistical description of the interference (as in SSP). We demonstrate the performance of this method via simulations and experimental MEG data. RESULTS: The eSSS method clearly outperforms SSS and SSP in interference suppression regardless of the extent of a priori information available on the interference sources. We also show that the method does not cause location or amplitude bias in dipole modeling. CONCLUSION: Our eSSS method provides better data quality than SSP or SSS and can be readily combined with other SSS-based methods, such as spatiotemporal SSS or head movement compensation. Thus, eSSS extends and complements the interference suppression techniques currently available for MEG. SIGNIFICANCE: Due to its ability to suppress external interference to the level of sensor noise, eSSS can facilitate single-trial data analysis, exemplified in automated analysis of epileptic data. Such an enhanced suppression is especially important in environments with large interference fields. 2021-06-17 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8513798/ /pubmed/33232223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2020.3040373 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Helle, Liisa Nenonen, Jukka Larson, Eric Simola, Juha Parkkonen, Lauri Taulu, Samu Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG |
title | Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG |
title_full | Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG |
title_fullStr | Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG |
title_full_unstemmed | Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG |
title_short | Extended Signal-Space Separation Method for Improved Interference Suppression in MEG |
title_sort | extended signal-space separation method for improved interference suppression in meg |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33232223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2020.3040373 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT helleliisa extendedsignalspaceseparationmethodforimprovedinterferencesuppressioninmeg AT nenonenjukka extendedsignalspaceseparationmethodforimprovedinterferencesuppressioninmeg AT larsoneric extendedsignalspaceseparationmethodforimprovedinterferencesuppressioninmeg AT simolajuha extendedsignalspaceseparationmethodforimprovedinterferencesuppressioninmeg AT parkkonenlauri extendedsignalspaceseparationmethodforimprovedinterferencesuppressioninmeg AT taulusamu extendedsignalspaceseparationmethodforimprovedinterferencesuppressioninmeg |