Cargando…
Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase
BACKGROUND: California Proposition 56 increased cigarette excise tax by $2 per pack with equivalent increases on non-cigarette tobacco products. We estimated the changes in cigarette price, cigarette use, and non-cigarette use following the implementation of Proposition 56 in California in 2017. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257553 |
_version_ | 1784583292883828736 |
---|---|
author | Gunadi, Christian Benmarhnia, Tarik White, Martha Pierce, John P. McMenamin, Sara B. Leas, Eric C. Shi, Yuyan |
author_facet | Gunadi, Christian Benmarhnia, Tarik White, Martha Pierce, John P. McMenamin, Sara B. Leas, Eric C. Shi, Yuyan |
author_sort | Gunadi, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: California Proposition 56 increased cigarette excise tax by $2 per pack with equivalent increases on non-cigarette tobacco products. We estimated the changes in cigarette price, cigarette use, and non-cigarette use following the implementation of Proposition 56 in California in 2017. METHODS: Seven waves of Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) 2011–2019 data were used to obtain state-level aggregate self-reported outcomes, including cigarette price per pack, current and daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, and current and daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products (hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco). A modified version of a synthetic control method was used to create a “synthetic” California that best resembled pre-policy sociodemographic characteristics and outcome trends in California while correcting time-invariant pre-policy differences. Various sensitivity analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: The implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with an increase in self-reported cigarette price per pack in California ($1.844, 95%CI: $0.153, $3.534; p = 0.032). No evidence suggested that Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the prevalence of current or daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, or the prevalence of current or daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products. CONCLUSION: Most of the cigarette tax increase following Proposition 56 in California was passed on to consumers. There is a lack of evidence that the implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the use of cigarettes and other tobacco products such as hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8513910 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85139102021-10-14 Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase Gunadi, Christian Benmarhnia, Tarik White, Martha Pierce, John P. McMenamin, Sara B. Leas, Eric C. Shi, Yuyan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: California Proposition 56 increased cigarette excise tax by $2 per pack with equivalent increases on non-cigarette tobacco products. We estimated the changes in cigarette price, cigarette use, and non-cigarette use following the implementation of Proposition 56 in California in 2017. METHODS: Seven waves of Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) 2011–2019 data were used to obtain state-level aggregate self-reported outcomes, including cigarette price per pack, current and daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, and current and daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products (hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco). A modified version of a synthetic control method was used to create a “synthetic” California that best resembled pre-policy sociodemographic characteristics and outcome trends in California while correcting time-invariant pre-policy differences. Various sensitivity analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: The implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with an increase in self-reported cigarette price per pack in California ($1.844, 95%CI: $0.153, $3.534; p = 0.032). No evidence suggested that Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the prevalence of current or daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, or the prevalence of current or daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products. CONCLUSION: Most of the cigarette tax increase following Proposition 56 in California was passed on to consumers. There is a lack of evidence that the implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the use of cigarettes and other tobacco products such as hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco. Public Library of Science 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8513910/ /pubmed/34644338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257553 Text en © 2021 Gunadi et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gunadi, Christian Benmarhnia, Tarik White, Martha Pierce, John P. McMenamin, Sara B. Leas, Eric C. Shi, Yuyan Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase |
title | Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase |
title_full | Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase |
title_fullStr | Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase |
title_full_unstemmed | Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase |
title_short | Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase |
title_sort | tobacco price and use following california proposition 56 tobacco tax increase |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257553 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gunadichristian tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease AT benmarhniatarik tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease AT whitemartha tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease AT piercejohnp tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease AT mcmenaminsarab tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease AT leasericc tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease AT shiyuyan tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease |