Cargando…

Qualitative Review of Organizational Responses to Rumors in the 2014–2016 Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak in Liberia and Sierra Leone

INTRODUCTION: Rumors and misperceptions were a persistent challenge in the response to the 2014–2016 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak in West Africa. This study aimed to document organizational approaches to identifying and addressing rumors and provide practical recommendations for future outbrea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brandt, Amelia J., Katalenich, Bonnie, Seal, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34593588
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00203
_version_ 1784583314635489280
author Brandt, Amelia J.
Katalenich, Bonnie
Seal, David W.
author_facet Brandt, Amelia J.
Katalenich, Bonnie
Seal, David W.
author_sort Brandt, Amelia J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rumors and misperceptions were a persistent challenge in the response to the 2014–2016 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak in West Africa. This study aimed to document organizational approaches to identifying and addressing rumors and provide practical recommendations for future outbreaks. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 34 individuals who participated in the EVD response in Liberia and/or Sierra Leone. Interviews focused on the general organizational approach and organizational response to specific rumors. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. RESULTS: Most respondents reported that rumors were considered an organizational priority and their importance increased over time. Formal rumor identification systems using community-level reporters were described in Liberia and Sierra Leone as well as varied informal systems. A wide range of approaches was used to address rumors including Community Led Ebola Action, Community Led Total Sanitation, drama performances, Ebola Treatment Center/Unit-based approaches, radio, leveraging community leaders as an information source, and organization change. Interpersonal and community-led approaches were described most often. Staff whose professional roles did not involve rumor management reported informally addressing rumors with colleagues and beneficiaries. Rumors reflecting valid concerns with the EVD response, such as potential infection in health care facilities, were addressed through organizational change and improvement. DISCUSSION: Interpersonal and community-led approaches were considered effective by participants and hold promise for future outbreaks. Informal systems developed at Ebola Treatment Centers/Units highlighted how these facilities may be utilized as an information hub. Professionals who interact with beneficiaries, especially local staff, are likely to address rumors informally and organizations may benefit from considering local staff an asset in rumor management. Rumors alerted responders to issues in the EVD response, but this may not be the most efficient mechanism to receive and address concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8514024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85140242021-10-18 Qualitative Review of Organizational Responses to Rumors in the 2014–2016 Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak in Liberia and Sierra Leone Brandt, Amelia J. Katalenich, Bonnie Seal, David W. Glob Health Sci Pract Original Article INTRODUCTION: Rumors and misperceptions were a persistent challenge in the response to the 2014–2016 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak in West Africa. This study aimed to document organizational approaches to identifying and addressing rumors and provide practical recommendations for future outbreaks. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 34 individuals who participated in the EVD response in Liberia and/or Sierra Leone. Interviews focused on the general organizational approach and organizational response to specific rumors. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. RESULTS: Most respondents reported that rumors were considered an organizational priority and their importance increased over time. Formal rumor identification systems using community-level reporters were described in Liberia and Sierra Leone as well as varied informal systems. A wide range of approaches was used to address rumors including Community Led Ebola Action, Community Led Total Sanitation, drama performances, Ebola Treatment Center/Unit-based approaches, radio, leveraging community leaders as an information source, and organization change. Interpersonal and community-led approaches were described most often. Staff whose professional roles did not involve rumor management reported informally addressing rumors with colleagues and beneficiaries. Rumors reflecting valid concerns with the EVD response, such as potential infection in health care facilities, were addressed through organizational change and improvement. DISCUSSION: Interpersonal and community-led approaches were considered effective by participants and hold promise for future outbreaks. Informal systems developed at Ebola Treatment Centers/Units highlighted how these facilities may be utilized as an information hub. Professionals who interact with beneficiaries, especially local staff, are likely to address rumors informally and organizations may benefit from considering local staff an asset in rumor management. Rumors alerted responders to issues in the EVD response, but this may not be the most efficient mechanism to receive and address concerns. Global Health: Science and Practice 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8514024/ /pubmed/34593588 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00203 Text en © Brandt et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00203
spellingShingle Original Article
Brandt, Amelia J.
Katalenich, Bonnie
Seal, David W.
Qualitative Review of Organizational Responses to Rumors in the 2014–2016 Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak in Liberia and Sierra Leone
title Qualitative Review of Organizational Responses to Rumors in the 2014–2016 Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak in Liberia and Sierra Leone
title_full Qualitative Review of Organizational Responses to Rumors in the 2014–2016 Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak in Liberia and Sierra Leone
title_fullStr Qualitative Review of Organizational Responses to Rumors in the 2014–2016 Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak in Liberia and Sierra Leone
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Review of Organizational Responses to Rumors in the 2014–2016 Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak in Liberia and Sierra Leone
title_short Qualitative Review of Organizational Responses to Rumors in the 2014–2016 Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak in Liberia and Sierra Leone
title_sort qualitative review of organizational responses to rumors in the 2014–2016 ebola virus disease outbreak in liberia and sierra leone
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34593588
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00203
work_keys_str_mv AT brandtameliaj qualitativereviewoforganizationalresponsestorumorsinthe20142016ebolavirusdiseaseoutbreakinliberiaandsierraleone
AT katalenichbonnie qualitativereviewoforganizationalresponsestorumorsinthe20142016ebolavirusdiseaseoutbreakinliberiaandsierraleone
AT sealdavidw qualitativereviewoforganizationalresponsestorumorsinthe20142016ebolavirusdiseaseoutbreakinliberiaandsierraleone