Cargando…

Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials’ Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study

INTRODUCTION: Hydrophilicity of dental impression materials is crucial for obtaining an accurate impression and necessary for the production of a well-fitting cast restoration. The most common technique for evaluation of hydrophilicity is a contact angle measurement. The aim of the present in vitro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Theocharidou, Anna, Tzimas, Konstantinos, Tolidis, Kosmas, Tortopidis, Dimitrios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658372
http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc55/3/3
_version_ 1784583343235399680
author Theocharidou, Anna
Tzimas, Konstantinos
Tolidis, Kosmas
Tortopidis, Dimitrios
author_facet Theocharidou, Anna
Tzimas, Konstantinos
Tolidis, Kosmas
Tortopidis, Dimitrios
author_sort Theocharidou, Anna
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hydrophilicity of dental impression materials is crucial for obtaining an accurate impression and necessary for the production of a well-fitting cast restoration. The most common technique for evaluation of hydrophilicity is a contact angle measurement. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare the water contact angles of four groups of elastomeric impression materials, before and during setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Flattened specimens (n=10) of tested impression materials were prepared by the use of a Teflon mold with specific dimensions. A 5μl droplet of deionized water fell on the specimen, and photos were taken using a Nikon D3200 DSLR camera and a 105 mm macro lens (Nikorr, Nikon) in specific time points. RESULTS: The CAD/CAM material showed the highest contact angle measurements. The light body polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) material 1, polyether and vinylsiloxanether material showed comparable contact angle measurements especially at the initial time point. A statistically significant reduction of contact angles was reported during setup time for all PVS, PE and vinylsiloxanether materials, while the most expressed reduction of contact angle measurements, and thus the most significant increase of hydrophilicity were reported for light wash PVS material 2. CONCLUSIONS: The CAD/CAM impression material showed the most hydrophobic behavior. PVS materials showed excellent hydrophilicity. Polyether and polyvinyloxanether impression materials presented lower contact angle measurements, and thus superior hydrophilicity, compared with other tested materials initially and during setting. All tested impression materials presented a stepwise development of hydrophilicity during the setting stage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8514227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85142272021-10-15 Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials’ Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study Theocharidou, Anna Tzimas, Konstantinos Tolidis, Kosmas Tortopidis, Dimitrios Acta Stomatol Croat Original Scientific Papers INTRODUCTION: Hydrophilicity of dental impression materials is crucial for obtaining an accurate impression and necessary for the production of a well-fitting cast restoration. The most common technique for evaluation of hydrophilicity is a contact angle measurement. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare the water contact angles of four groups of elastomeric impression materials, before and during setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Flattened specimens (n=10) of tested impression materials were prepared by the use of a Teflon mold with specific dimensions. A 5μl droplet of deionized water fell on the specimen, and photos were taken using a Nikon D3200 DSLR camera and a 105 mm macro lens (Nikorr, Nikon) in specific time points. RESULTS: The CAD/CAM material showed the highest contact angle measurements. The light body polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) material 1, polyether and vinylsiloxanether material showed comparable contact angle measurements especially at the initial time point. A statistically significant reduction of contact angles was reported during setup time for all PVS, PE and vinylsiloxanether materials, while the most expressed reduction of contact angle measurements, and thus the most significant increase of hydrophilicity were reported for light wash PVS material 2. CONCLUSIONS: The CAD/CAM impression material showed the most hydrophobic behavior. PVS materials showed excellent hydrophilicity. Polyether and polyvinyloxanether impression materials presented lower contact angle measurements, and thus superior hydrophilicity, compared with other tested materials initially and during setting. All tested impression materials presented a stepwise development of hydrophilicity during the setting stage. University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8514227/ /pubmed/34658372 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc55/3/3 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Papers
Theocharidou, Anna
Tzimas, Konstantinos
Tolidis, Kosmas
Tortopidis, Dimitrios
Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials’ Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study
title Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials’ Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study
title_full Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials’ Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials’ Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials’ Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study
title_short Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials’ Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study
title_sort evaluation of elastomeric impression materials’ hydrophilicity: an in vitro study
topic Original Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658372
http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc55/3/3
work_keys_str_mv AT theocharidouanna evaluationofelastomericimpressionmaterialshydrophilicityaninvitrostudy
AT tzimaskonstantinos evaluationofelastomericimpressionmaterialshydrophilicityaninvitrostudy
AT tolidiskosmas evaluationofelastomericimpressionmaterialshydrophilicityaninvitrostudy
AT tortopidisdimitrios evaluationofelastomericimpressionmaterialshydrophilicityaninvitrostudy