Cargando…

Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction

OBJECTIVE OF WORK: Wrong-site tooth extraction (WSTE) is the most common serious patient safety incident in dentistry. Safety checklists have significantly reduced wrong-site surgery, although their benefit is unproven in primary care dentistry. Our quality improvement project developed and implemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacob, Oliver, Gough, Evelyn, Thomas, Heidi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658378
http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc55/3/9
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE OF WORK: Wrong-site tooth extraction (WSTE) is the most common serious patient safety incident in dentistry. Safety checklists have significantly reduced wrong-site surgery, although their benefit is unproven in primary care dentistry. Our quality improvement project developed and implemented a checklist optimised for oral surgery procedures in primary care to reduce WSTE risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Local best practice for tooth extraction record-keeping (LBP), using national guidelines and standards was devised. We then retrospectively audited tooth extraction record-keeping against LBP. Deficiencies in current record-keeping practice were identified and used to design a checklist aimed at improving compliance. We provided a computerised safety checklist compliant with LBP to eleven clinicians at three general dental clinics within our region. The checklist included a pre-operative safety check, a pause to re-confirm the surgical site and a post-operative record-keeping proforma. The checklist was linked to our record-keeping software for use during tooth extraction. We audited checklist completion and compliance with LBP fortnightly for ten weeks. RESULTS: The introduction of a safety checklist resulted in increased compliance with LBP for tooth extraction record keeping. At week ten, 67% of records contained the computerised safety checklist. This resulted in a 50% increase in overall compliance with LBP for tooth extraction compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: A computerised safety checklist for tooth extraction in primary care has potential to improve patient safety by adopting measures to prevent WSTE and standardising communication between clinicians. Checklists in general practice should be encouraged.