Cargando…

Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction

OBJECTIVE OF WORK: Wrong-site tooth extraction (WSTE) is the most common serious patient safety incident in dentistry. Safety checklists have significantly reduced wrong-site surgery, although their benefit is unproven in primary care dentistry. Our quality improvement project developed and implemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacob, Oliver, Gough, Evelyn, Thomas, Heidi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658378
http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc55/3/9
_version_ 1784583343978840064
author Jacob, Oliver
Gough, Evelyn
Thomas, Heidi
author_facet Jacob, Oliver
Gough, Evelyn
Thomas, Heidi
author_sort Jacob, Oliver
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE OF WORK: Wrong-site tooth extraction (WSTE) is the most common serious patient safety incident in dentistry. Safety checklists have significantly reduced wrong-site surgery, although their benefit is unproven in primary care dentistry. Our quality improvement project developed and implemented a checklist optimised for oral surgery procedures in primary care to reduce WSTE risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Local best practice for tooth extraction record-keeping (LBP), using national guidelines and standards was devised. We then retrospectively audited tooth extraction record-keeping against LBP. Deficiencies in current record-keeping practice were identified and used to design a checklist aimed at improving compliance. We provided a computerised safety checklist compliant with LBP to eleven clinicians at three general dental clinics within our region. The checklist included a pre-operative safety check, a pause to re-confirm the surgical site and a post-operative record-keeping proforma. The checklist was linked to our record-keeping software for use during tooth extraction. We audited checklist completion and compliance with LBP fortnightly for ten weeks. RESULTS: The introduction of a safety checklist resulted in increased compliance with LBP for tooth extraction record keeping. At week ten, 67% of records contained the computerised safety checklist. This resulted in a 50% increase in overall compliance with LBP for tooth extraction compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: A computerised safety checklist for tooth extraction in primary care has potential to improve patient safety by adopting measures to prevent WSTE and standardising communication between clinicians. Checklists in general practice should be encouraged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8514230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85142302021-10-15 Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction Jacob, Oliver Gough, Evelyn Thomas, Heidi Acta Stomatol Croat Professional Papers OBJECTIVE OF WORK: Wrong-site tooth extraction (WSTE) is the most common serious patient safety incident in dentistry. Safety checklists have significantly reduced wrong-site surgery, although their benefit is unproven in primary care dentistry. Our quality improvement project developed and implemented a checklist optimised for oral surgery procedures in primary care to reduce WSTE risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Local best practice for tooth extraction record-keeping (LBP), using national guidelines and standards was devised. We then retrospectively audited tooth extraction record-keeping against LBP. Deficiencies in current record-keeping practice were identified and used to design a checklist aimed at improving compliance. We provided a computerised safety checklist compliant with LBP to eleven clinicians at three general dental clinics within our region. The checklist included a pre-operative safety check, a pause to re-confirm the surgical site and a post-operative record-keeping proforma. The checklist was linked to our record-keeping software for use during tooth extraction. We audited checklist completion and compliance with LBP fortnightly for ten weeks. RESULTS: The introduction of a safety checklist resulted in increased compliance with LBP for tooth extraction record keeping. At week ten, 67% of records contained the computerised safety checklist. This resulted in a 50% increase in overall compliance with LBP for tooth extraction compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: A computerised safety checklist for tooth extraction in primary care has potential to improve patient safety by adopting measures to prevent WSTE and standardising communication between clinicians. Checklists in general practice should be encouraged. University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8514230/ /pubmed/34658378 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc55/3/9 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Professional Papers
Jacob, Oliver
Gough, Evelyn
Thomas, Heidi
Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction
title Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction
title_full Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction
title_fullStr Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction
title_full_unstemmed Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction
title_short Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction
title_sort preventing wrong tooth extraction
topic Professional Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658378
http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc55/3/9
work_keys_str_mv AT jacoboliver preventingwrongtoothextraction
AT goughevelyn preventingwrongtoothextraction
AT thomasheidi preventingwrongtoothextraction