Cargando…
Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction
OBJECTIVE OF WORK: Wrong-site tooth extraction (WSTE) is the most common serious patient safety incident in dentistry. Safety checklists have significantly reduced wrong-site surgery, although their benefit is unproven in primary care dentistry. Our quality improvement project developed and implemen...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658378 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc55/3/9 |
_version_ | 1784583343978840064 |
---|---|
author | Jacob, Oliver Gough, Evelyn Thomas, Heidi |
author_facet | Jacob, Oliver Gough, Evelyn Thomas, Heidi |
author_sort | Jacob, Oliver |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE OF WORK: Wrong-site tooth extraction (WSTE) is the most common serious patient safety incident in dentistry. Safety checklists have significantly reduced wrong-site surgery, although their benefit is unproven in primary care dentistry. Our quality improvement project developed and implemented a checklist optimised for oral surgery procedures in primary care to reduce WSTE risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Local best practice for tooth extraction record-keeping (LBP), using national guidelines and standards was devised. We then retrospectively audited tooth extraction record-keeping against LBP. Deficiencies in current record-keeping practice were identified and used to design a checklist aimed at improving compliance. We provided a computerised safety checklist compliant with LBP to eleven clinicians at three general dental clinics within our region. The checklist included a pre-operative safety check, a pause to re-confirm the surgical site and a post-operative record-keeping proforma. The checklist was linked to our record-keeping software for use during tooth extraction. We audited checklist completion and compliance with LBP fortnightly for ten weeks. RESULTS: The introduction of a safety checklist resulted in increased compliance with LBP for tooth extraction record keeping. At week ten, 67% of records contained the computerised safety checklist. This resulted in a 50% increase in overall compliance with LBP for tooth extraction compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: A computerised safety checklist for tooth extraction in primary care has potential to improve patient safety by adopting measures to prevent WSTE and standardising communication between clinicians. Checklists in general practice should be encouraged. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8514230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85142302021-10-15 Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction Jacob, Oliver Gough, Evelyn Thomas, Heidi Acta Stomatol Croat Professional Papers OBJECTIVE OF WORK: Wrong-site tooth extraction (WSTE) is the most common serious patient safety incident in dentistry. Safety checklists have significantly reduced wrong-site surgery, although their benefit is unproven in primary care dentistry. Our quality improvement project developed and implemented a checklist optimised for oral surgery procedures in primary care to reduce WSTE risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Local best practice for tooth extraction record-keeping (LBP), using national guidelines and standards was devised. We then retrospectively audited tooth extraction record-keeping against LBP. Deficiencies in current record-keeping practice were identified and used to design a checklist aimed at improving compliance. We provided a computerised safety checklist compliant with LBP to eleven clinicians at three general dental clinics within our region. The checklist included a pre-operative safety check, a pause to re-confirm the surgical site and a post-operative record-keeping proforma. The checklist was linked to our record-keeping software for use during tooth extraction. We audited checklist completion and compliance with LBP fortnightly for ten weeks. RESULTS: The introduction of a safety checklist resulted in increased compliance with LBP for tooth extraction record keeping. At week ten, 67% of records contained the computerised safety checklist. This resulted in a 50% increase in overall compliance with LBP for tooth extraction compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: A computerised safety checklist for tooth extraction in primary care has potential to improve patient safety by adopting measures to prevent WSTE and standardising communication between clinicians. Checklists in general practice should be encouraged. University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8514230/ /pubmed/34658378 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc55/3/9 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Professional Papers Jacob, Oliver Gough, Evelyn Thomas, Heidi Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction |
title | Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction |
title_full | Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction |
title_fullStr | Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction |
title_full_unstemmed | Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction |
title_short | Preventing Wrong Tooth Extraction |
title_sort | preventing wrong tooth extraction |
topic | Professional Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658378 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc55/3/9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacoboliver preventingwrongtoothextraction AT goughevelyn preventingwrongtoothextraction AT thomasheidi preventingwrongtoothextraction |