Cargando…
Levosimendan versus dobutamine for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Levosimendan and dobutamine are extensively used to treat sepsis-associated cardiovascular failure in ICU. Nevertheless, the role and mechanism of levosimendan in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy remains unclear. Moreover, previous studies on whether levosimendan is superior to dobutamine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99716-9 |
_version_ | 1784583424808321024 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Dong-Hua Ning, Yi-Le Lei, Yan-Yan Chen, Jing Liu, Yan-Yan Lin, Xin-Feng Yang, Zhong-Qi Xian, Shao-Xiang Chen, Wei-Tao |
author_facet | Liu, Dong-Hua Ning, Yi-Le Lei, Yan-Yan Chen, Jing Liu, Yan-Yan Lin, Xin-Feng Yang, Zhong-Qi Xian, Shao-Xiang Chen, Wei-Tao |
author_sort | Liu, Dong-Hua |
collection | PubMed |
description | Levosimendan and dobutamine are extensively used to treat sepsis-associated cardiovascular failure in ICU. Nevertheless, the role and mechanism of levosimendan in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy remains unclear. Moreover, previous studies on whether levosimendan is superior to dobutamine are still controversial. More importantly, these studies did not take changes (before-after comparison to the baseline) in quantitative parameters such as ejection fraction into account with the baseline level. Here, we aimed to determine the pros and cons of the two medicines by assessing the changes in cardiac function and blood lactate, mortality, with the standardized mean difference used as a summary statistic. Relevant studies were obtained by a thorough and disciplined literature search in several notable academic databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase until November 2020. Outcomes included changes in cardiac function, lactic acid, mortality and length of hospital stay. A total of 6 randomized controlled trials were included in this study, including 192 patients. Compared with dobutamine, patients treated with levosimendan had a greater improvement of cardiac index (ΔCI) (random effects, SMD = 0.90 [0.20,1.60]; I(2) = 76%, P < 0.01) and left ventricular stroke work index (ΔLVSWI) (random effects, SMD = 1.56 [0.90,2.21]; I(2) = 65%, P = 0.04), a significant decrease of blood lactate (Δblood lactate) (random effects, MD = − 0.79 [− 1.33, − 0.25]; I(2) = 68%, P < 0.01) at 24-h after drug intervention, respectively. There was no significant difference between levosimendan and dobutamine on all-cause mortality in ICU (fixed effect, OR = 0.72 [0.39,1.33]; I(2) = 0%, P = 0.99). We combine effect sizes related to different measurement parameters to evaluate cardiac function, which implied that septic patients with myocardial dysfunction might have a better improvement of cardiac function by levosimendan than dobutamine (random effects, SMD = 1.05 [0.69,1.41]; I(2) = 67%, P < 0.01). This study suggested a significant improvement of CI, LVSWI, and decrease of blood lactate in septic patients with myocardial dysfunction in ICU after 24-h administration of levosimendan than dobutamine. However, the administration of levosimendan has neither an impact on mortality nor LVEF. Septic patients with myocardial dysfunction may partly benefit from levosimendan than dobutamine, mainly embodied in cardiac function improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8514594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85145942021-10-15 Levosimendan versus dobutamine for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Liu, Dong-Hua Ning, Yi-Le Lei, Yan-Yan Chen, Jing Liu, Yan-Yan Lin, Xin-Feng Yang, Zhong-Qi Xian, Shao-Xiang Chen, Wei-Tao Sci Rep Article Levosimendan and dobutamine are extensively used to treat sepsis-associated cardiovascular failure in ICU. Nevertheless, the role and mechanism of levosimendan in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy remains unclear. Moreover, previous studies on whether levosimendan is superior to dobutamine are still controversial. More importantly, these studies did not take changes (before-after comparison to the baseline) in quantitative parameters such as ejection fraction into account with the baseline level. Here, we aimed to determine the pros and cons of the two medicines by assessing the changes in cardiac function and blood lactate, mortality, with the standardized mean difference used as a summary statistic. Relevant studies were obtained by a thorough and disciplined literature search in several notable academic databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase until November 2020. Outcomes included changes in cardiac function, lactic acid, mortality and length of hospital stay. A total of 6 randomized controlled trials were included in this study, including 192 patients. Compared with dobutamine, patients treated with levosimendan had a greater improvement of cardiac index (ΔCI) (random effects, SMD = 0.90 [0.20,1.60]; I(2) = 76%, P < 0.01) and left ventricular stroke work index (ΔLVSWI) (random effects, SMD = 1.56 [0.90,2.21]; I(2) = 65%, P = 0.04), a significant decrease of blood lactate (Δblood lactate) (random effects, MD = − 0.79 [− 1.33, − 0.25]; I(2) = 68%, P < 0.01) at 24-h after drug intervention, respectively. There was no significant difference between levosimendan and dobutamine on all-cause mortality in ICU (fixed effect, OR = 0.72 [0.39,1.33]; I(2) = 0%, P = 0.99). We combine effect sizes related to different measurement parameters to evaluate cardiac function, which implied that septic patients with myocardial dysfunction might have a better improvement of cardiac function by levosimendan than dobutamine (random effects, SMD = 1.05 [0.69,1.41]; I(2) = 67%, P < 0.01). This study suggested a significant improvement of CI, LVSWI, and decrease of blood lactate in septic patients with myocardial dysfunction in ICU after 24-h administration of levosimendan than dobutamine. However, the administration of levosimendan has neither an impact on mortality nor LVEF. Septic patients with myocardial dysfunction may partly benefit from levosimendan than dobutamine, mainly embodied in cardiac function improvement. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8514594/ /pubmed/34645892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99716-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Dong-Hua Ning, Yi-Le Lei, Yan-Yan Chen, Jing Liu, Yan-Yan Lin, Xin-Feng Yang, Zhong-Qi Xian, Shao-Xiang Chen, Wei-Tao Levosimendan versus dobutamine for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Levosimendan versus dobutamine for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Levosimendan versus dobutamine for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Levosimendan versus dobutamine for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Levosimendan versus dobutamine for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Levosimendan versus dobutamine for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | levosimendan versus dobutamine for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99716-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liudonghua levosimendanversusdobutamineforsepsisinducedcardiacdysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ningyile levosimendanversusdobutamineforsepsisinducedcardiacdysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leiyanyan levosimendanversusdobutamineforsepsisinducedcardiacdysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenjing levosimendanversusdobutamineforsepsisinducedcardiacdysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuyanyan levosimendanversusdobutamineforsepsisinducedcardiacdysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linxinfeng levosimendanversusdobutamineforsepsisinducedcardiacdysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangzhongqi levosimendanversusdobutamineforsepsisinducedcardiacdysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xianshaoxiang levosimendanversusdobutamineforsepsisinducedcardiacdysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenweitao levosimendanversusdobutamineforsepsisinducedcardiacdysfunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |