Cargando…
Artificial Intelligence for COVID-19: A Systematic Review
Background: Recently, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has affected more than 200 countries and lead to enormous losses. This study systematically reviews the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques in COVID-19, esp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660623 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.704256 |
_version_ | 1784583469655916544 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Lian Zhang, Yonggang Wang, Dongguang Tong, Xiang Liu, Tao Zhang, Shijie Huang, Jizhen Zhang, Li Chen, Lingmin Fan, Hong Clarke, Mike |
author_facet | Wang, Lian Zhang, Yonggang Wang, Dongguang Tong, Xiang Liu, Tao Zhang, Shijie Huang, Jizhen Zhang, Li Chen, Lingmin Fan, Hong Clarke, Mike |
author_sort | Wang, Lian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Recently, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has affected more than 200 countries and lead to enormous losses. This study systematically reviews the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques in COVID-19, especially for diagnosis, estimation of epidemic trends, prognosis, and exploration of effective and safe drugs and vaccines; and discusses the potential limitations. Methods: We report this systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception to 19 September 2020 for published studies of AI applications in COVID-19. We used PROBAST (prediction model risk of bias assessment tool) to assess the quality of literature related to the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19. We registered the protocol (PROSPERO CRD42020211555). Results: We included 78 studies: 46 articles discussed AI-assisted diagnosis for COVID-19 with total accuracy of 70.00 to 99.92%, sensitivity of 73.00 to 100.00%, specificity of 25 to 100.00%, and area under the curve of 0.732 to 1.000. Fourteen articles evaluated prognosis based on clinical characteristics at hospital admission, such as clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics, reaching accuracy of 74.4 to 95.20%, sensitivity of 72.8 to 98.00%, specificity of 55 to 96.87% and AUC of 0.66 to 0.997 in predicting critical COVID-19. Nine articles used AI models to predict the epidemic of the COVID-19, such as epidemic peak, infection rate, number of infected cases, transmission laws, and development trend. Eight articles used AI to explore potential effective drugs, primarily through drug repurposing and drug development. Finally, 1 article predicted vaccine targets that have the potential to develop COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: In this review, we have shown that AI achieved high performance in diagnosis, prognosis evaluation, epidemic prediction and drug discovery for COVID-19. AI has the potential to enhance significantly existing medical and healthcare system efficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8514781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85147812021-10-15 Artificial Intelligence for COVID-19: A Systematic Review Wang, Lian Zhang, Yonggang Wang, Dongguang Tong, Xiang Liu, Tao Zhang, Shijie Huang, Jizhen Zhang, Li Chen, Lingmin Fan, Hong Clarke, Mike Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: Recently, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has affected more than 200 countries and lead to enormous losses. This study systematically reviews the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques in COVID-19, especially for diagnosis, estimation of epidemic trends, prognosis, and exploration of effective and safe drugs and vaccines; and discusses the potential limitations. Methods: We report this systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception to 19 September 2020 for published studies of AI applications in COVID-19. We used PROBAST (prediction model risk of bias assessment tool) to assess the quality of literature related to the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19. We registered the protocol (PROSPERO CRD42020211555). Results: We included 78 studies: 46 articles discussed AI-assisted diagnosis for COVID-19 with total accuracy of 70.00 to 99.92%, sensitivity of 73.00 to 100.00%, specificity of 25 to 100.00%, and area under the curve of 0.732 to 1.000. Fourteen articles evaluated prognosis based on clinical characteristics at hospital admission, such as clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics, reaching accuracy of 74.4 to 95.20%, sensitivity of 72.8 to 98.00%, specificity of 55 to 96.87% and AUC of 0.66 to 0.997 in predicting critical COVID-19. Nine articles used AI models to predict the epidemic of the COVID-19, such as epidemic peak, infection rate, number of infected cases, transmission laws, and development trend. Eight articles used AI to explore potential effective drugs, primarily through drug repurposing and drug development. Finally, 1 article predicted vaccine targets that have the potential to develop COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: In this review, we have shown that AI achieved high performance in diagnosis, prognosis evaluation, epidemic prediction and drug discovery for COVID-19. AI has the potential to enhance significantly existing medical and healthcare system efficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8514781/ /pubmed/34660623 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.704256 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Zhang, Wang, Tong, Liu, Zhang, Huang, Zhang, Chen, Fan and Clarke. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Wang, Lian Zhang, Yonggang Wang, Dongguang Tong, Xiang Liu, Tao Zhang, Shijie Huang, Jizhen Zhang, Li Chen, Lingmin Fan, Hong Clarke, Mike Artificial Intelligence for COVID-19: A Systematic Review |
title | Artificial Intelligence for COVID-19: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Artificial Intelligence for COVID-19: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Artificial Intelligence for COVID-19: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial Intelligence for COVID-19: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Artificial Intelligence for COVID-19: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | artificial intelligence for covid-19: a systematic review |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660623 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.704256 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanglian artificialintelligenceforcovid19asystematicreview AT zhangyonggang artificialintelligenceforcovid19asystematicreview AT wangdongguang artificialintelligenceforcovid19asystematicreview AT tongxiang artificialintelligenceforcovid19asystematicreview AT liutao artificialintelligenceforcovid19asystematicreview AT zhangshijie artificialintelligenceforcovid19asystematicreview AT huangjizhen artificialintelligenceforcovid19asystematicreview AT zhangli artificialintelligenceforcovid19asystematicreview AT chenlingmin artificialintelligenceforcovid19asystematicreview AT fanhong artificialintelligenceforcovid19asystematicreview AT clarkemike artificialintelligenceforcovid19asystematicreview |