Cargando…

The Balance Between the Effectiveness and Safety for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting of Different Doses of Olanzapine (10 mg Versus 5 mg): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to rigorously review the efficacy and safety of olanzapine in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) settings including (1) at 5- and 10-mg doses, and (2) the setting of highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Dong-Yang, Chen, Yi, Zhang, You, Shen, Ying-Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660273
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.705866
_version_ 1784583491482025984
author Wang, Dong-Yang
Chen, Yi
Zhang, You
Shen, Ying-Qiang
author_facet Wang, Dong-Yang
Chen, Yi
Zhang, You
Shen, Ying-Qiang
author_sort Wang, Dong-Yang
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to rigorously review the efficacy and safety of olanzapine in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) settings including (1) at 5- and 10-mg doses, and (2) the setting of highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). METHODS: Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library were searched from the establishment of the database through April 18, 2021. The primary efficacy endpoints were the rate of complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue), in the acute (0–24 h post-chemotherapy), delayed (24–120 h post-chemotherapy), and overall (0–120 h post-chemotherapy) phases. The secondary efficacy endpoints were the rates of complete control (CC, no nausea, and no emesis), for each phase. Safety endpoints were the rate of somnolence, as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria. The Mantel–Haenszel, random, or fixed-effect analysis model was used to compute risk ratios and accompanying 95% confidence intervals for each endpoint. For endpoints that statistically favored one arm, absolute risk differences were computed to assess whether there is a 10% or greater difference, used as the threshold for clinical significance by MASCC/ESMO. RESULT: Nine studies reported the use of 10 mg olanzapine to prevent CINV; three studies reported the use of 5 mg olanzapine to prevent CINV. When olanzapine was administered at 10 mg for HEC patients, the six endpoints were statistically and clinically better than the control group. For MEC patients, four out of six endpoints were better than the control group. When olanzapine is administered at 5 mg for MEC patients, four endpoints have statistical and clinical advantages. The sedative effects of 10 and 5 mg olanzapine were statistically more significant than those of the control group. The sedative effect of the 10-mg olanzapine group was more significant than that of the 5-mg olanzapine group, both statistically and clinically. CONCLUSION: 5 mg olanzapine may be as effective as 10 mg olanzapine for patients with HEC and MEC, and its sedative effect is lower than 10 mg olanzapine. Fewer studies on 5 mg olanzapine have led to uncertain data. In the future, more randomized controlled trials of 5 mg olanzapine are needed to study the balance between the effectiveness and safety of olanzapine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8514875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85148752021-10-15 The Balance Between the Effectiveness and Safety for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting of Different Doses of Olanzapine (10 mg Versus 5 mg): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wang, Dong-Yang Chen, Yi Zhang, You Shen, Ying-Qiang Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to rigorously review the efficacy and safety of olanzapine in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) settings including (1) at 5- and 10-mg doses, and (2) the setting of highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). METHODS: Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library were searched from the establishment of the database through April 18, 2021. The primary efficacy endpoints were the rate of complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue), in the acute (0–24 h post-chemotherapy), delayed (24–120 h post-chemotherapy), and overall (0–120 h post-chemotherapy) phases. The secondary efficacy endpoints were the rates of complete control (CC, no nausea, and no emesis), for each phase. Safety endpoints were the rate of somnolence, as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria. The Mantel–Haenszel, random, or fixed-effect analysis model was used to compute risk ratios and accompanying 95% confidence intervals for each endpoint. For endpoints that statistically favored one arm, absolute risk differences were computed to assess whether there is a 10% or greater difference, used as the threshold for clinical significance by MASCC/ESMO. RESULT: Nine studies reported the use of 10 mg olanzapine to prevent CINV; three studies reported the use of 5 mg olanzapine to prevent CINV. When olanzapine was administered at 10 mg for HEC patients, the six endpoints were statistically and clinically better than the control group. For MEC patients, four out of six endpoints were better than the control group. When olanzapine is administered at 5 mg for MEC patients, four endpoints have statistical and clinical advantages. The sedative effects of 10 and 5 mg olanzapine were statistically more significant than those of the control group. The sedative effect of the 10-mg olanzapine group was more significant than that of the 5-mg olanzapine group, both statistically and clinically. CONCLUSION: 5 mg olanzapine may be as effective as 10 mg olanzapine for patients with HEC and MEC, and its sedative effect is lower than 10 mg olanzapine. Fewer studies on 5 mg olanzapine have led to uncertain data. In the future, more randomized controlled trials of 5 mg olanzapine are needed to study the balance between the effectiveness and safety of olanzapine. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8514875/ /pubmed/34660273 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.705866 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Chen, Zhang and Shen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wang, Dong-Yang
Chen, Yi
Zhang, You
Shen, Ying-Qiang
The Balance Between the Effectiveness and Safety for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting of Different Doses of Olanzapine (10 mg Versus 5 mg): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Balance Between the Effectiveness and Safety for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting of Different Doses of Olanzapine (10 mg Versus 5 mg): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Balance Between the Effectiveness and Safety for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting of Different Doses of Olanzapine (10 mg Versus 5 mg): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Balance Between the Effectiveness and Safety for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting of Different Doses of Olanzapine (10 mg Versus 5 mg): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Balance Between the Effectiveness and Safety for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting of Different Doses of Olanzapine (10 mg Versus 5 mg): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Balance Between the Effectiveness and Safety for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting of Different Doses of Olanzapine (10 mg Versus 5 mg): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort balance between the effectiveness and safety for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting of different doses of olanzapine (10 mg versus 5 mg): a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660273
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.705866
work_keys_str_mv AT wangdongyang thebalancebetweentheeffectivenessandsafetyforchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingofdifferentdosesofolanzapine10mgversus5mgasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenyi thebalancebetweentheeffectivenessandsafetyforchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingofdifferentdosesofolanzapine10mgversus5mgasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyou thebalancebetweentheeffectivenessandsafetyforchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingofdifferentdosesofolanzapine10mgversus5mgasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenyingqiang thebalancebetweentheeffectivenessandsafetyforchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingofdifferentdosesofolanzapine10mgversus5mgasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangdongyang balancebetweentheeffectivenessandsafetyforchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingofdifferentdosesofolanzapine10mgversus5mgasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenyi balancebetweentheeffectivenessandsafetyforchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingofdifferentdosesofolanzapine10mgversus5mgasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyou balancebetweentheeffectivenessandsafetyforchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingofdifferentdosesofolanzapine10mgversus5mgasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenyingqiang balancebetweentheeffectivenessandsafetyforchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingofdifferentdosesofolanzapine10mgversus5mgasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis