Cargando…

Biaxial Flexural Strength of High-Translucence Monolithic Ceramics upon Various Thicknesses

INTRODUCTION: High-translucence ceramics have been used increasingly. This study evaluated the biaxial flexural strength of different ceramics as a result of varying thicknesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Circular discs with varied thickness of 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, and 2.0 mm were pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juntavee, Niwut, Juntavee, Apa, Phetpanompond, Sirintana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4323914
_version_ 1784583515633876992
author Juntavee, Niwut
Juntavee, Apa
Phetpanompond, Sirintana
author_facet Juntavee, Niwut
Juntavee, Apa
Phetpanompond, Sirintana
author_sort Juntavee, Niwut
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: High-translucence ceramics have been used increasingly. This study evaluated the biaxial flexural strength of different ceramics as a result of varying thicknesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Circular discs with varied thickness of 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, and 2.0 mm were prepared from high-translucence yttria-partially stabilized zirconia (HTY-PSZ); Bruxzir(®) Anterior (Bc), and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) including Celtra(®) DUO (Cc) and VITA Suprinity(®) (Vc) (n = 15 discs/group). Biaxial flexural strength (σ) was evaluated utilizing piston-on-three-balls in a testing machine at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to determine the microscopic structure. ANOVA and multiple comparisons were analyzed for significant differences (a = 0.05). RESULTS: The mean ± sd value of σ (MPa) for thickness 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, and 2.0 mm was 672.66 ± 107.54, 655.93 ± 93.98, 589.01 ± 63.63, 624.89 ± 87.08, 618.82 ± 83.36, 672.64 ± 84.61, 659.81 ± 122.89, 632.79 ± 92.54, and 657.86 ± 73.17, for Bc; 477.64 ± 88.23, 496.39 ± 86.36, 461.56 ± 57.00, 450.26 ± 86.60, 468.28 ± 83.65, 472.45 ± 53.63, 453.05 ± 72.50, 462.67 ± 47.57, and 535.28 ± 84.33, for Cc; and 500.97 ± 76.36, 506.70 ± 87.76, 557.82 ± 62.78, 543.76 ± 87.29, 507.53 ± 86.09, 502.46 ± 64.75, 557.70 ± 80.91, 527.04 ± 80.78, and 499.88 ± 57.35, for Vc. A significant difference in flexural strength was indicated among groups (p < 0.05). Bc was significantly stronger than Cc and Vc (p < 0.05). Varying thickness did not have a significant influence on strength (p > 0.05). SEM revealed a tight arrangement of crystals for Bc and needle-like crystals diffusing in glass for Vc and Cc. CONCLUSION: Flexural strength of ceramics varied among types, but each retained strength equitably with varying thickness. HTY-PSZ was stronger than ZLS, but each was equally strong for thickness in the range of 0.4–2.0 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8514975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85149752021-10-15 Biaxial Flexural Strength of High-Translucence Monolithic Ceramics upon Various Thicknesses Juntavee, Niwut Juntavee, Apa Phetpanompond, Sirintana ScientificWorldJournal Research Article INTRODUCTION: High-translucence ceramics have been used increasingly. This study evaluated the biaxial flexural strength of different ceramics as a result of varying thicknesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Circular discs with varied thickness of 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, and 2.0 mm were prepared from high-translucence yttria-partially stabilized zirconia (HTY-PSZ); Bruxzir(®) Anterior (Bc), and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) including Celtra(®) DUO (Cc) and VITA Suprinity(®) (Vc) (n = 15 discs/group). Biaxial flexural strength (σ) was evaluated utilizing piston-on-three-balls in a testing machine at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to determine the microscopic structure. ANOVA and multiple comparisons were analyzed for significant differences (a = 0.05). RESULTS: The mean ± sd value of σ (MPa) for thickness 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, and 2.0 mm was 672.66 ± 107.54, 655.93 ± 93.98, 589.01 ± 63.63, 624.89 ± 87.08, 618.82 ± 83.36, 672.64 ± 84.61, 659.81 ± 122.89, 632.79 ± 92.54, and 657.86 ± 73.17, for Bc; 477.64 ± 88.23, 496.39 ± 86.36, 461.56 ± 57.00, 450.26 ± 86.60, 468.28 ± 83.65, 472.45 ± 53.63, 453.05 ± 72.50, 462.67 ± 47.57, and 535.28 ± 84.33, for Cc; and 500.97 ± 76.36, 506.70 ± 87.76, 557.82 ± 62.78, 543.76 ± 87.29, 507.53 ± 86.09, 502.46 ± 64.75, 557.70 ± 80.91, 527.04 ± 80.78, and 499.88 ± 57.35, for Vc. A significant difference in flexural strength was indicated among groups (p < 0.05). Bc was significantly stronger than Cc and Vc (p < 0.05). Varying thickness did not have a significant influence on strength (p > 0.05). SEM revealed a tight arrangement of crystals for Bc and needle-like crystals diffusing in glass for Vc and Cc. CONCLUSION: Flexural strength of ceramics varied among types, but each retained strength equitably with varying thickness. HTY-PSZ was stronger than ZLS, but each was equally strong for thickness in the range of 0.4–2.0 mm. Hindawi 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8514975/ /pubmed/34658676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4323914 Text en Copyright © 2021 Niwut Juntavee et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Juntavee, Niwut
Juntavee, Apa
Phetpanompond, Sirintana
Biaxial Flexural Strength of High-Translucence Monolithic Ceramics upon Various Thicknesses
title Biaxial Flexural Strength of High-Translucence Monolithic Ceramics upon Various Thicknesses
title_full Biaxial Flexural Strength of High-Translucence Monolithic Ceramics upon Various Thicknesses
title_fullStr Biaxial Flexural Strength of High-Translucence Monolithic Ceramics upon Various Thicknesses
title_full_unstemmed Biaxial Flexural Strength of High-Translucence Monolithic Ceramics upon Various Thicknesses
title_short Biaxial Flexural Strength of High-Translucence Monolithic Ceramics upon Various Thicknesses
title_sort biaxial flexural strength of high-translucence monolithic ceramics upon various thicknesses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8514975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34658676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4323914
work_keys_str_mv AT juntaveeniwut biaxialflexuralstrengthofhightranslucencemonolithicceramicsuponvariousthicknesses
AT juntaveeapa biaxialflexuralstrengthofhightranslucencemonolithicceramicsuponvariousthicknesses
AT phetpanompondsirintana biaxialflexuralstrengthofhightranslucencemonolithicceramicsuponvariousthicknesses