Cargando…

Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial)

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is among the top three most common diseases worldwide, resulting in a life with pain-related disability. To date, no study has assessed the efficacy of metamizole (dipyrone), a non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic prodrug compared with the conventional non-steroidal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wertli, Maria M, Flury, Julian S, Streit, Sven, Limacher, Andreas, Schuler, Vanessa, Ferrante, Asha-Naima, Rimensberger, Caroline, Haschke, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048531
_version_ 1784583613190242304
author Wertli, Maria M
Flury, Julian S
Streit, Sven
Limacher, Andreas
Schuler, Vanessa
Ferrante, Asha-Naima
Rimensberger, Caroline
Haschke, Manuel
author_facet Wertli, Maria M
Flury, Julian S
Streit, Sven
Limacher, Andreas
Schuler, Vanessa
Ferrante, Asha-Naima
Rimensberger, Caroline
Haschke, Manuel
author_sort Wertli, Maria M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is among the top three most common diseases worldwide, resulting in a life with pain-related disability. To date, no study has assessed the efficacy of metamizole (dipyrone), a non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic prodrug compared with the conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen, in patients with an acute LBP episode. Further, it is unclear, whether a short educational intervention is superior to usual care alone. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess first, whether metamizole is non-inferior to ibuprofen in a new episode of acute or subacute LBP. Second, we aim to assess whether a short educational intervention including evidence-based patient information on the nature of LBP is superior to usual care alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An investigator-initiated multicentre, randomised, double blind trial using a factorial design will be performed. A total of 120 participants with a new episode of LBP will be recruited from GP practices, outpatient clinics and from emergency departments, and randomised into four different treatment groups: ibuprofen alone, ibuprofen and short intervention, metamizole alone, metamizole and short intervention. The primary endpoint for the medical treatment will be change in pain assessed on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale after 14 days. The primary outcome for the short intervention will be change in the Core Outcome Measures Index assessed after 42 days. ETHICS, DISSEMINATION AND FUNDING: This study has been approved by the responsible Ethics Board (Ethikkommission Bern/2018-01986) and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic/2019DR4002). Results will be published in open access policy peer-reviewed journals. The study is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 32 003B-179346). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04111315
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8515449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85154492021-10-27 Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial) Wertli, Maria M Flury, Julian S Streit, Sven Limacher, Andreas Schuler, Vanessa Ferrante, Asha-Naima Rimensberger, Caroline Haschke, Manuel BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is among the top three most common diseases worldwide, resulting in a life with pain-related disability. To date, no study has assessed the efficacy of metamizole (dipyrone), a non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic prodrug compared with the conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen, in patients with an acute LBP episode. Further, it is unclear, whether a short educational intervention is superior to usual care alone. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess first, whether metamizole is non-inferior to ibuprofen in a new episode of acute or subacute LBP. Second, we aim to assess whether a short educational intervention including evidence-based patient information on the nature of LBP is superior to usual care alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An investigator-initiated multicentre, randomised, double blind trial using a factorial design will be performed. A total of 120 participants with a new episode of LBP will be recruited from GP practices, outpatient clinics and from emergency departments, and randomised into four different treatment groups: ibuprofen alone, ibuprofen and short intervention, metamizole alone, metamizole and short intervention. The primary endpoint for the medical treatment will be change in pain assessed on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale after 14 days. The primary outcome for the short intervention will be change in the Core Outcome Measures Index assessed after 42 days. ETHICS, DISSEMINATION AND FUNDING: This study has been approved by the responsible Ethics Board (Ethikkommission Bern/2018-01986) and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic/2019DR4002). Results will be published in open access policy peer-reviewed journals. The study is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 32 003B-179346). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04111315 BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8515449/ /pubmed/34645660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048531 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Wertli, Maria M
Flury, Julian S
Streit, Sven
Limacher, Andreas
Schuler, Vanessa
Ferrante, Asha-Naima
Rimensberger, Caroline
Haschke, Manuel
Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial)
title Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial)
title_full Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial)
title_fullStr Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial)
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial)
title_short Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial)
title_sort efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (emisi trial)
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048531
work_keys_str_mv AT wertlimariam efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial
AT fluryjulians efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial
AT streitsven efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial
AT limacherandreas efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial
AT schulervanessa efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial
AT ferranteashanaima efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial
AT rimensbergercaroline efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial
AT haschkemanuel efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial