Cargando…
Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial)
INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is among the top three most common diseases worldwide, resulting in a life with pain-related disability. To date, no study has assessed the efficacy of metamizole (dipyrone), a non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic prodrug compared with the conventional non-steroidal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048531 |
_version_ | 1784583613190242304 |
---|---|
author | Wertli, Maria M Flury, Julian S Streit, Sven Limacher, Andreas Schuler, Vanessa Ferrante, Asha-Naima Rimensberger, Caroline Haschke, Manuel |
author_facet | Wertli, Maria M Flury, Julian S Streit, Sven Limacher, Andreas Schuler, Vanessa Ferrante, Asha-Naima Rimensberger, Caroline Haschke, Manuel |
author_sort | Wertli, Maria M |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is among the top three most common diseases worldwide, resulting in a life with pain-related disability. To date, no study has assessed the efficacy of metamizole (dipyrone), a non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic prodrug compared with the conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen, in patients with an acute LBP episode. Further, it is unclear, whether a short educational intervention is superior to usual care alone. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess first, whether metamizole is non-inferior to ibuprofen in a new episode of acute or subacute LBP. Second, we aim to assess whether a short educational intervention including evidence-based patient information on the nature of LBP is superior to usual care alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An investigator-initiated multicentre, randomised, double blind trial using a factorial design will be performed. A total of 120 participants with a new episode of LBP will be recruited from GP practices, outpatient clinics and from emergency departments, and randomised into four different treatment groups: ibuprofen alone, ibuprofen and short intervention, metamizole alone, metamizole and short intervention. The primary endpoint for the medical treatment will be change in pain assessed on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale after 14 days. The primary outcome for the short intervention will be change in the Core Outcome Measures Index assessed after 42 days. ETHICS, DISSEMINATION AND FUNDING: This study has been approved by the responsible Ethics Board (Ethikkommission Bern/2018-01986) and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic/2019DR4002). Results will be published in open access policy peer-reviewed journals. The study is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 32 003B-179346). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04111315 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8515449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85154492021-10-27 Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial) Wertli, Maria M Flury, Julian S Streit, Sven Limacher, Andreas Schuler, Vanessa Ferrante, Asha-Naima Rimensberger, Caroline Haschke, Manuel BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is among the top three most common diseases worldwide, resulting in a life with pain-related disability. To date, no study has assessed the efficacy of metamizole (dipyrone), a non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic prodrug compared with the conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen, in patients with an acute LBP episode. Further, it is unclear, whether a short educational intervention is superior to usual care alone. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess first, whether metamizole is non-inferior to ibuprofen in a new episode of acute or subacute LBP. Second, we aim to assess whether a short educational intervention including evidence-based patient information on the nature of LBP is superior to usual care alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An investigator-initiated multicentre, randomised, double blind trial using a factorial design will be performed. A total of 120 participants with a new episode of LBP will be recruited from GP practices, outpatient clinics and from emergency departments, and randomised into four different treatment groups: ibuprofen alone, ibuprofen and short intervention, metamizole alone, metamizole and short intervention. The primary endpoint for the medical treatment will be change in pain assessed on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale after 14 days. The primary outcome for the short intervention will be change in the Core Outcome Measures Index assessed after 42 days. ETHICS, DISSEMINATION AND FUNDING: This study has been approved by the responsible Ethics Board (Ethikkommission Bern/2018-01986) and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic/2019DR4002). Results will be published in open access policy peer-reviewed journals. The study is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 32 003B-179346). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04111315 BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8515449/ /pubmed/34645660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048531 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Wertli, Maria M Flury, Julian S Streit, Sven Limacher, Andreas Schuler, Vanessa Ferrante, Asha-Naima Rimensberger, Caroline Haschke, Manuel Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial) |
title | Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial) |
title_full | Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial) |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial) |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial) |
title_short | Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial) |
title_sort | efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (emisi trial) |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048531 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wertlimariam efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial AT fluryjulians efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial AT streitsven efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial AT limacherandreas efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial AT schulervanessa efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial AT ferranteashanaima efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial AT rimensbergercaroline efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial AT haschkemanuel efficacyofmetamizoleversusibuprofenandashorteducationalinterventionversusstandardcareinacuteandsubacutelowbackpainastudyprotocolofarandomisedmulticentrefactorialtrialemisitrial |