Cargando…

Comparative study of immunohematological tests with canine blood samples submitted for a direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test

BACKGROUND: A 2019 ACVIM consensus statement on diagnostics for immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) in dogs made testing recommendations. As data on the performance of immunohematological tests was lacking, we undertook a comparative analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anticoagulated blood samples f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Idalan, Nadine, Zeitz, Johanna O., Weber, Corinna N., Müller, Elisabeth, Giger, Urs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40575-021-00107-0
_version_ 1784583675425325056
author Idalan, Nadine
Zeitz, Johanna O.
Weber, Corinna N.
Müller, Elisabeth
Giger, Urs
author_facet Idalan, Nadine
Zeitz, Johanna O.
Weber, Corinna N.
Müller, Elisabeth
Giger, Urs
author_sort Idalan, Nadine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A 2019 ACVIM consensus statement on diagnostics for immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) in dogs made testing recommendations. As data on the performance of immunohematological tests was lacking, we undertook a comparative analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anticoagulated blood samples from 126 dogs suspected of having IMHA submitted to a diagnostic veterinary laboratory for a routine direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and from 28 healthy control dogs were evaluated for spherocytosis and autoagglutination before and after three saline washes. Samples were also subjected to different DATs: a gel minitube and an immunochromatographic strip kit used in clinics; neutral gel column cards, microtiter plates (at 4°, 22°, and 37°C), capillary tubes, and flow cytometry used in laboratories. RESULTS: Samples from healthy dogs yielded negative results with all immunodiagnostic tests. Among the 126 samples submitted for DAT 67 were positive by a DAT utilizing microtiter plates with goat anti-dog antiglobulin DAT at 22°C. Notably, DAT results were comparable and consistent across all evaluated methods regardless of antiglobulin and temperature used. DAT+ dogs were more severely anemic and more likely to have erythroid regeneration compared to DAT- dogs. Macroscopic agglutination in tubes or on slides was observed in 48 samples after 1:1 and 1:4 blood to saline dilution, but only persisted in four samples after washing. Among the DAT+ samples, 57% had agglutination, 87% had spherocytosis, and 45% had both. There was good correlation between spherocytosis and DAT results from the six DAT techniques, but the correlation with autoagglutination was only fair. Clinical follow-up was available for 42 dogs. Of the sample from 12 DAT+ dogs collected during treatment, 10 remained DAT+ when tested 1–24 weeks after initial assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon this comparative prospective survey, all in-clinic and laboratory DAT techniques produced similar results when performed by trained personnel and can therefore be recommended for detection of antibody-coated erythrocytes and immunohematological diagnosis. In addition, use of these tests for monitoring response of IMHA dogs to treatment might be valuable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40575-021-00107-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8515749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85157492021-10-20 Comparative study of immunohematological tests with canine blood samples submitted for a direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test Idalan, Nadine Zeitz, Johanna O. Weber, Corinna N. Müller, Elisabeth Giger, Urs Canine Med Genet Research BACKGROUND: A 2019 ACVIM consensus statement on diagnostics for immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) in dogs made testing recommendations. As data on the performance of immunohematological tests was lacking, we undertook a comparative analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anticoagulated blood samples from 126 dogs suspected of having IMHA submitted to a diagnostic veterinary laboratory for a routine direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and from 28 healthy control dogs were evaluated for spherocytosis and autoagglutination before and after three saline washes. Samples were also subjected to different DATs: a gel minitube and an immunochromatographic strip kit used in clinics; neutral gel column cards, microtiter plates (at 4°, 22°, and 37°C), capillary tubes, and flow cytometry used in laboratories. RESULTS: Samples from healthy dogs yielded negative results with all immunodiagnostic tests. Among the 126 samples submitted for DAT 67 were positive by a DAT utilizing microtiter plates with goat anti-dog antiglobulin DAT at 22°C. Notably, DAT results were comparable and consistent across all evaluated methods regardless of antiglobulin and temperature used. DAT+ dogs were more severely anemic and more likely to have erythroid regeneration compared to DAT- dogs. Macroscopic agglutination in tubes or on slides was observed in 48 samples after 1:1 and 1:4 blood to saline dilution, but only persisted in four samples after washing. Among the DAT+ samples, 57% had agglutination, 87% had spherocytosis, and 45% had both. There was good correlation between spherocytosis and DAT results from the six DAT techniques, but the correlation with autoagglutination was only fair. Clinical follow-up was available for 42 dogs. Of the sample from 12 DAT+ dogs collected during treatment, 10 remained DAT+ when tested 1–24 weeks after initial assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon this comparative prospective survey, all in-clinic and laboratory DAT techniques produced similar results when performed by trained personnel and can therefore be recommended for detection of antibody-coated erythrocytes and immunohematological diagnosis. In addition, use of these tests for monitoring response of IMHA dogs to treatment might be valuable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40575-021-00107-0. BioMed Central 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8515749/ /pubmed/34645506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40575-021-00107-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Idalan, Nadine
Zeitz, Johanna O.
Weber, Corinna N.
Müller, Elisabeth
Giger, Urs
Comparative study of immunohematological tests with canine blood samples submitted for a direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test
title Comparative study of immunohematological tests with canine blood samples submitted for a direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test
title_full Comparative study of immunohematological tests with canine blood samples submitted for a direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test
title_fullStr Comparative study of immunohematological tests with canine blood samples submitted for a direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of immunohematological tests with canine blood samples submitted for a direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test
title_short Comparative study of immunohematological tests with canine blood samples submitted for a direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test
title_sort comparative study of immunohematological tests with canine blood samples submitted for a direct antiglobulin (coombs’) test
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40575-021-00107-0
work_keys_str_mv AT idalannadine comparativestudyofimmunohematologicaltestswithcaninebloodsamplessubmittedforadirectantiglobulincoombstest
AT zeitzjohannao comparativestudyofimmunohematologicaltestswithcaninebloodsamplessubmittedforadirectantiglobulincoombstest
AT webercorinnan comparativestudyofimmunohematologicaltestswithcaninebloodsamplessubmittedforadirectantiglobulincoombstest
AT mullerelisabeth comparativestudyofimmunohematologicaltestswithcaninebloodsamplessubmittedforadirectantiglobulincoombstest
AT gigerurs comparativestudyofimmunohematologicaltestswithcaninebloodsamplessubmittedforadirectantiglobulincoombstest