Cargando…
Determination of gluten immunogenic peptides for the management of the treatment adherence of celiac disease: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Gluten is a complex mixture of proteins with immunogenic peptide sequences triggering the autoimmune activity in patients with celiac disease (CeD). Gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP) are resistant to gastrointestinal digestion and are then excreted via the stool and urine. Most common de...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i37.6306 |
_version_ | 1784583684173594624 |
---|---|
author | Coto, Laura Mendia, Irati Sousa, Carolina Bai, Julio César Cebolla, Angel |
author_facet | Coto, Laura Mendia, Irati Sousa, Carolina Bai, Julio César Cebolla, Angel |
author_sort | Coto, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gluten is a complex mixture of proteins with immunogenic peptide sequences triggering the autoimmune activity in patients with celiac disease (CeD). Gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP) are resistant to gastrointestinal digestion and are then excreted via the stool and urine. Most common detection methods applied in the follow-up visits for CeD patients such as serology tests, dietetic interviews, questionnaires, and duodenal biopsy have been proved to be inefficient, invasive, or inaccurate for evaluating gluten-free diet (GFD) compliance. Determination of excreted GIP in stool and urine has been developed as a non-invasive, direct, and specific test for GFD monitoring. AIM: To summarize published literature about the clinical utility of GIP determination in comparison to the tools employed for GFD monitoring. METHODS: PubMed and Web of Science searches were performed using the keywords “gluten immunogenic peptides” or “gluten immunogenic peptide” and a combination of the previous terms with “feces”, “stools”, “urine”, “celiac disease”, “gluten-free diet”, and “adherence” to identify relevant clinical studies published in English and Spanish between 2012 to January 2021. Reference lists from the articles were reviewed to identify additional pertinent articles. Published articles and abstracts reporting the clinical use of GIP determination in stool and/or urine for the follow-up of patients with CeD in comparison with other tools in use were included. Case reports, commentaries, reviews, conference papers, letters, and publications that did not focus on the aims of this review were excluded. RESULTS: Total of 15 publications were found that involved the use of GIP determination in stool and/or urine to monitor the adherence to the GFD in comparison to other tools. Studies included both children and adults diagnosed with CeD and healthy volunteers. Overall, these preliminary studies indicated that this novel technique was highly sensitive for the detection of GFD transgressions and therefore could facilitate the follow-up of patients with CeD. Tools identified in this work included the CeD-specific serology, dietetic questionnaires, symptomatology, and the duodenal biopsy. Review of the literature revealed that the rates of GFD adherence may vary between 30%-93% using either stool or urine GIP determination, 49%-96% by the serology, 59%-94% using the dietetic questionnaires, 56%-95% by the reported symptoms and 44%-76% with the duodenal biopsy. In addition, the association between the different methods and histological abnormalities (Marsh II-III) was found to be 33%-100% for GIP determination (stool and urine), 25%-39% for CeD-specific serology, 3%-50% for dietetic questionnaires, and 22%-28% for the symptomatology. CONCLUSION: Excreted GIP detection is the precise approach for determining voluntary or involuntary gluten consumption in CeD patients preventing future complications arising from gluten exposure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8515793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85157932021-10-27 Determination of gluten immunogenic peptides for the management of the treatment adherence of celiac disease: A systematic review Coto, Laura Mendia, Irati Sousa, Carolina Bai, Julio César Cebolla, Angel World J Gastroenterol Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Gluten is a complex mixture of proteins with immunogenic peptide sequences triggering the autoimmune activity in patients with celiac disease (CeD). Gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP) are resistant to gastrointestinal digestion and are then excreted via the stool and urine. Most common detection methods applied in the follow-up visits for CeD patients such as serology tests, dietetic interviews, questionnaires, and duodenal biopsy have been proved to be inefficient, invasive, or inaccurate for evaluating gluten-free diet (GFD) compliance. Determination of excreted GIP in stool and urine has been developed as a non-invasive, direct, and specific test for GFD monitoring. AIM: To summarize published literature about the clinical utility of GIP determination in comparison to the tools employed for GFD monitoring. METHODS: PubMed and Web of Science searches were performed using the keywords “gluten immunogenic peptides” or “gluten immunogenic peptide” and a combination of the previous terms with “feces”, “stools”, “urine”, “celiac disease”, “gluten-free diet”, and “adherence” to identify relevant clinical studies published in English and Spanish between 2012 to January 2021. Reference lists from the articles were reviewed to identify additional pertinent articles. Published articles and abstracts reporting the clinical use of GIP determination in stool and/or urine for the follow-up of patients with CeD in comparison with other tools in use were included. Case reports, commentaries, reviews, conference papers, letters, and publications that did not focus on the aims of this review were excluded. RESULTS: Total of 15 publications were found that involved the use of GIP determination in stool and/or urine to monitor the adherence to the GFD in comparison to other tools. Studies included both children and adults diagnosed with CeD and healthy volunteers. Overall, these preliminary studies indicated that this novel technique was highly sensitive for the detection of GFD transgressions and therefore could facilitate the follow-up of patients with CeD. Tools identified in this work included the CeD-specific serology, dietetic questionnaires, symptomatology, and the duodenal biopsy. Review of the literature revealed that the rates of GFD adherence may vary between 30%-93% using either stool or urine GIP determination, 49%-96% by the serology, 59%-94% using the dietetic questionnaires, 56%-95% by the reported symptoms and 44%-76% with the duodenal biopsy. In addition, the association between the different methods and histological abnormalities (Marsh II-III) was found to be 33%-100% for GIP determination (stool and urine), 25%-39% for CeD-specific serology, 3%-50% for dietetic questionnaires, and 22%-28% for the symptomatology. CONCLUSION: Excreted GIP detection is the precise approach for determining voluntary or involuntary gluten consumption in CeD patients preventing future complications arising from gluten exposure. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-10-07 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8515793/ /pubmed/34712034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i37.6306 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Coto, Laura Mendia, Irati Sousa, Carolina Bai, Julio César Cebolla, Angel Determination of gluten immunogenic peptides for the management of the treatment adherence of celiac disease: A systematic review |
title | Determination of gluten immunogenic peptides for the management of the treatment adherence of celiac disease: A systematic review |
title_full | Determination of gluten immunogenic peptides for the management of the treatment adherence of celiac disease: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Determination of gluten immunogenic peptides for the management of the treatment adherence of celiac disease: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Determination of gluten immunogenic peptides for the management of the treatment adherence of celiac disease: A systematic review |
title_short | Determination of gluten immunogenic peptides for the management of the treatment adherence of celiac disease: A systematic review |
title_sort | determination of gluten immunogenic peptides for the management of the treatment adherence of celiac disease: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i37.6306 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cotolaura determinationofglutenimmunogenicpeptidesforthemanagementofthetreatmentadherenceofceliacdiseaseasystematicreview AT mendiairati determinationofglutenimmunogenicpeptidesforthemanagementofthetreatmentadherenceofceliacdiseaseasystematicreview AT sousacarolina determinationofglutenimmunogenicpeptidesforthemanagementofthetreatmentadherenceofceliacdiseaseasystematicreview AT baijuliocesar determinationofglutenimmunogenicpeptidesforthemanagementofthetreatmentadherenceofceliacdiseaseasystematicreview AT cebollaangel determinationofglutenimmunogenicpeptidesforthemanagementofthetreatmentadherenceofceliacdiseaseasystematicreview |