Cargando…

Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus

Routine testing for SARS-CoV-2 is rare for institutes of higher education due to prohibitive costs and supply chain delays. During spring 2021, we routinely tested all residential students 1 to 2 times per week using pooled, RNA-extraction-free, reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) testi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vander Schaaf, Nicole A., Fund, Anthony J., Munnich, Brianna V., Zastrow, Alexi L., Fund, Erin E., Senti, Tanner L., Lynn, Abigail F., Kane, Jonathon J., Love, Jennifer L., Long, Gregory J., Troendle, Nicholas J., Sharda, Daniel R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.01089-21
_version_ 1784583712685424640
author Vander Schaaf, Nicole A.
Fund, Anthony J.
Munnich, Brianna V.
Zastrow, Alexi L.
Fund, Erin E.
Senti, Tanner L.
Lynn, Abigail F.
Kane, Jonathon J.
Love, Jennifer L.
Long, Gregory J.
Troendle, Nicholas J.
Sharda, Daniel R.
author_facet Vander Schaaf, Nicole A.
Fund, Anthony J.
Munnich, Brianna V.
Zastrow, Alexi L.
Fund, Erin E.
Senti, Tanner L.
Lynn, Abigail F.
Kane, Jonathon J.
Love, Jennifer L.
Long, Gregory J.
Troendle, Nicholas J.
Sharda, Daniel R.
author_sort Vander Schaaf, Nicole A.
collection PubMed
description Routine testing for SARS-CoV-2 is rare for institutes of higher education due to prohibitive costs and supply chain delays. During spring 2021, we routinely tested all residential students 1 to 2 times per week using pooled, RNA-extraction-free, reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) testing of saliva at a cost of $0.43/sample with same-day results. The limit of detection was 500 copies/ml on individual samples, and analysis indicates 1,000 and 2,500 copies/ml in pools of 5 and 10, respectively, which is orders of magnitude more sensitive than rapid antigen tests. Importantly, saliva testing flagged 83% of semester positives (43,884 tests administered) and was 95.6% concordant with nasopharyngeal diagnostic results (69.0% concordant on the first test when the nucleocapsid gene (N1) cycle threshold (C(T)) value was >30). Moreover, testing reduced weekly cases by 59.9% in the spring despite far looser restrictions, allowing for more normalcy while eliminating outbreaks. We also coupled our testing with a survey to clarify symptoms and transmissibility among college-age students. While only 8.5% remained asymptomatic throughout, symptoms were disparate and often cold-like (e.g., only 37.3% developed a fever), highlighting the difficulty with relying on symptom monitoring among this demographic. Based on reported symptom progression, we estimate that we removed 348 days of infectious individuals by routine testing. Interestingly, viral load (C(T) value) at the time of testing did not affect transmissibility (R(2) = 0.0085), though those experiencing noticeable symptoms at the time of testing were more likely to spread the virus to close contacts (31.6% versus 14.3%). Together, our findings support routine testing for reducing the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Implementation of cost- and resource-efficient approaches should receive strong consideration in communities that lack herd immunity. IMPORTANCE This study highlights the utility of routine testing for SARS-CoV-2 using pooled saliva while maintaining high sensitivity of detection (under 2,500 copies/ml) and rapid turnaround of high volume (up to 930 samples in 8 h by two technicians and one quantitative PCR [qPCR] machine). This pooled approach allowed us to test all residential students 1 to 2 times per week on our college campus during the spring of 2021 and flagged 83% of our semester positives. Most students were asymptomatic or presented with symptoms mirroring common colds at the time of testing, allowing for removal of infectious individuals before they otherwise would have sought testing. To our knowledge, the total per-sample consumable cost of $0.43 is the lowest to date. With many communities still lagging in vaccination rates, routine testing that is cost-efficient highlights the capacity of the laboratory’s role in controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8515933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85159332021-11-08 Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus Vander Schaaf, Nicole A. Fund, Anthony J. Munnich, Brianna V. Zastrow, Alexi L. Fund, Erin E. Senti, Tanner L. Lynn, Abigail F. Kane, Jonathon J. Love, Jennifer L. Long, Gregory J. Troendle, Nicholas J. Sharda, Daniel R. Microbiol Spectr Research Article Routine testing for SARS-CoV-2 is rare for institutes of higher education due to prohibitive costs and supply chain delays. During spring 2021, we routinely tested all residential students 1 to 2 times per week using pooled, RNA-extraction-free, reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) testing of saliva at a cost of $0.43/sample with same-day results. The limit of detection was 500 copies/ml on individual samples, and analysis indicates 1,000 and 2,500 copies/ml in pools of 5 and 10, respectively, which is orders of magnitude more sensitive than rapid antigen tests. Importantly, saliva testing flagged 83% of semester positives (43,884 tests administered) and was 95.6% concordant with nasopharyngeal diagnostic results (69.0% concordant on the first test when the nucleocapsid gene (N1) cycle threshold (C(T)) value was >30). Moreover, testing reduced weekly cases by 59.9% in the spring despite far looser restrictions, allowing for more normalcy while eliminating outbreaks. We also coupled our testing with a survey to clarify symptoms and transmissibility among college-age students. While only 8.5% remained asymptomatic throughout, symptoms were disparate and often cold-like (e.g., only 37.3% developed a fever), highlighting the difficulty with relying on symptom monitoring among this demographic. Based on reported symptom progression, we estimate that we removed 348 days of infectious individuals by routine testing. Interestingly, viral load (C(T) value) at the time of testing did not affect transmissibility (R(2) = 0.0085), though those experiencing noticeable symptoms at the time of testing were more likely to spread the virus to close contacts (31.6% versus 14.3%). Together, our findings support routine testing for reducing the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Implementation of cost- and resource-efficient approaches should receive strong consideration in communities that lack herd immunity. IMPORTANCE This study highlights the utility of routine testing for SARS-CoV-2 using pooled saliva while maintaining high sensitivity of detection (under 2,500 copies/ml) and rapid turnaround of high volume (up to 930 samples in 8 h by two technicians and one quantitative PCR [qPCR] machine). This pooled approach allowed us to test all residential students 1 to 2 times per week on our college campus during the spring of 2021 and flagged 83% of our semester positives. Most students were asymptomatic or presented with symptoms mirroring common colds at the time of testing, allowing for removal of infectious individuals before they otherwise would have sought testing. To our knowledge, the total per-sample consumable cost of $0.43 is the lowest to date. With many communities still lagging in vaccination rates, routine testing that is cost-efficient highlights the capacity of the laboratory’s role in controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2. American Society for Microbiology 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8515933/ /pubmed/34643445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.01089-21 Text en Copyright © 2021 Vander Schaaf et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Vander Schaaf, Nicole A.
Fund, Anthony J.
Munnich, Brianna V.
Zastrow, Alexi L.
Fund, Erin E.
Senti, Tanner L.
Lynn, Abigail F.
Kane, Jonathon J.
Love, Jennifer L.
Long, Gregory J.
Troendle, Nicholas J.
Sharda, Daniel R.
Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus
title Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus
title_full Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus
title_fullStr Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus
title_full_unstemmed Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus
title_short Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus
title_sort routine, cost-effective sars-cov-2 surveillance testing using pooled saliva limits viral spread on a residential college campus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.01089-21
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderschaafnicolea routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus
AT fundanthonyj routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus
AT munnichbriannav routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus
AT zastrowalexil routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus
AT funderine routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus
AT sentitannerl routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus
AT lynnabigailf routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus
AT kanejonathonj routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus
AT lovejenniferl routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus
AT longgregoryj routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus
AT troendlenicholasj routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus
AT shardadanielr routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus