Cargando…
Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus
Routine testing for SARS-CoV-2 is rare for institutes of higher education due to prohibitive costs and supply chain delays. During spring 2021, we routinely tested all residential students 1 to 2 times per week using pooled, RNA-extraction-free, reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) testi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.01089-21 |
_version_ | 1784583712685424640 |
---|---|
author | Vander Schaaf, Nicole A. Fund, Anthony J. Munnich, Brianna V. Zastrow, Alexi L. Fund, Erin E. Senti, Tanner L. Lynn, Abigail F. Kane, Jonathon J. Love, Jennifer L. Long, Gregory J. Troendle, Nicholas J. Sharda, Daniel R. |
author_facet | Vander Schaaf, Nicole A. Fund, Anthony J. Munnich, Brianna V. Zastrow, Alexi L. Fund, Erin E. Senti, Tanner L. Lynn, Abigail F. Kane, Jonathon J. Love, Jennifer L. Long, Gregory J. Troendle, Nicholas J. Sharda, Daniel R. |
author_sort | Vander Schaaf, Nicole A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Routine testing for SARS-CoV-2 is rare for institutes of higher education due to prohibitive costs and supply chain delays. During spring 2021, we routinely tested all residential students 1 to 2 times per week using pooled, RNA-extraction-free, reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) testing of saliva at a cost of $0.43/sample with same-day results. The limit of detection was 500 copies/ml on individual samples, and analysis indicates 1,000 and 2,500 copies/ml in pools of 5 and 10, respectively, which is orders of magnitude more sensitive than rapid antigen tests. Importantly, saliva testing flagged 83% of semester positives (43,884 tests administered) and was 95.6% concordant with nasopharyngeal diagnostic results (69.0% concordant on the first test when the nucleocapsid gene (N1) cycle threshold (C(T)) value was >30). Moreover, testing reduced weekly cases by 59.9% in the spring despite far looser restrictions, allowing for more normalcy while eliminating outbreaks. We also coupled our testing with a survey to clarify symptoms and transmissibility among college-age students. While only 8.5% remained asymptomatic throughout, symptoms were disparate and often cold-like (e.g., only 37.3% developed a fever), highlighting the difficulty with relying on symptom monitoring among this demographic. Based on reported symptom progression, we estimate that we removed 348 days of infectious individuals by routine testing. Interestingly, viral load (C(T) value) at the time of testing did not affect transmissibility (R(2) = 0.0085), though those experiencing noticeable symptoms at the time of testing were more likely to spread the virus to close contacts (31.6% versus 14.3%). Together, our findings support routine testing for reducing the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Implementation of cost- and resource-efficient approaches should receive strong consideration in communities that lack herd immunity. IMPORTANCE This study highlights the utility of routine testing for SARS-CoV-2 using pooled saliva while maintaining high sensitivity of detection (under 2,500 copies/ml) and rapid turnaround of high volume (up to 930 samples in 8 h by two technicians and one quantitative PCR [qPCR] machine). This pooled approach allowed us to test all residential students 1 to 2 times per week on our college campus during the spring of 2021 and flagged 83% of our semester positives. Most students were asymptomatic or presented with symptoms mirroring common colds at the time of testing, allowing for removal of infectious individuals before they otherwise would have sought testing. To our knowledge, the total per-sample consumable cost of $0.43 is the lowest to date. With many communities still lagging in vaccination rates, routine testing that is cost-efficient highlights the capacity of the laboratory’s role in controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8515933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85159332021-11-08 Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus Vander Schaaf, Nicole A. Fund, Anthony J. Munnich, Brianna V. Zastrow, Alexi L. Fund, Erin E. Senti, Tanner L. Lynn, Abigail F. Kane, Jonathon J. Love, Jennifer L. Long, Gregory J. Troendle, Nicholas J. Sharda, Daniel R. Microbiol Spectr Research Article Routine testing for SARS-CoV-2 is rare for institutes of higher education due to prohibitive costs and supply chain delays. During spring 2021, we routinely tested all residential students 1 to 2 times per week using pooled, RNA-extraction-free, reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) testing of saliva at a cost of $0.43/sample with same-day results. The limit of detection was 500 copies/ml on individual samples, and analysis indicates 1,000 and 2,500 copies/ml in pools of 5 and 10, respectively, which is orders of magnitude more sensitive than rapid antigen tests. Importantly, saliva testing flagged 83% of semester positives (43,884 tests administered) and was 95.6% concordant with nasopharyngeal diagnostic results (69.0% concordant on the first test when the nucleocapsid gene (N1) cycle threshold (C(T)) value was >30). Moreover, testing reduced weekly cases by 59.9% in the spring despite far looser restrictions, allowing for more normalcy while eliminating outbreaks. We also coupled our testing with a survey to clarify symptoms and transmissibility among college-age students. While only 8.5% remained asymptomatic throughout, symptoms were disparate and often cold-like (e.g., only 37.3% developed a fever), highlighting the difficulty with relying on symptom monitoring among this demographic. Based on reported symptom progression, we estimate that we removed 348 days of infectious individuals by routine testing. Interestingly, viral load (C(T) value) at the time of testing did not affect transmissibility (R(2) = 0.0085), though those experiencing noticeable symptoms at the time of testing were more likely to spread the virus to close contacts (31.6% versus 14.3%). Together, our findings support routine testing for reducing the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Implementation of cost- and resource-efficient approaches should receive strong consideration in communities that lack herd immunity. IMPORTANCE This study highlights the utility of routine testing for SARS-CoV-2 using pooled saliva while maintaining high sensitivity of detection (under 2,500 copies/ml) and rapid turnaround of high volume (up to 930 samples in 8 h by two technicians and one quantitative PCR [qPCR] machine). This pooled approach allowed us to test all residential students 1 to 2 times per week on our college campus during the spring of 2021 and flagged 83% of our semester positives. Most students were asymptomatic or presented with symptoms mirroring common colds at the time of testing, allowing for removal of infectious individuals before they otherwise would have sought testing. To our knowledge, the total per-sample consumable cost of $0.43 is the lowest to date. With many communities still lagging in vaccination rates, routine testing that is cost-efficient highlights the capacity of the laboratory’s role in controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2. American Society for Microbiology 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8515933/ /pubmed/34643445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.01089-21 Text en Copyright © 2021 Vander Schaaf et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vander Schaaf, Nicole A. Fund, Anthony J. Munnich, Brianna V. Zastrow, Alexi L. Fund, Erin E. Senti, Tanner L. Lynn, Abigail F. Kane, Jonathon J. Love, Jennifer L. Long, Gregory J. Troendle, Nicholas J. Sharda, Daniel R. Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus |
title | Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus |
title_full | Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus |
title_fullStr | Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus |
title_full_unstemmed | Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus |
title_short | Routine, Cost-Effective SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance Testing Using Pooled Saliva Limits Viral Spread on a Residential College Campus |
title_sort | routine, cost-effective sars-cov-2 surveillance testing using pooled saliva limits viral spread on a residential college campus |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8515933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.01089-21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderschaafnicolea routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus AT fundanthonyj routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus AT munnichbriannav routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus AT zastrowalexil routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus AT funderine routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus AT sentitannerl routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus AT lynnabigailf routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus AT kanejonathonj routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus AT lovejenniferl routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus AT longgregoryj routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus AT troendlenicholasj routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus AT shardadanielr routinecosteffectivesarscov2surveillancetestingusingpooledsalivalimitsviralspreadonaresidentialcollegecampus |