Cargando…

Assessment of anti-factor Xa activity in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving three different anticoagulation regimens

INTRODUCTION: Critically ill COVID-19 patients are at increased risk of thrombosis with an enhanced risk of bleeding. We aimed to explore the role of anti-factor Xa levels in optimizing the high-intensity anticoagulation’s safety and efficacy and finding possible associations between D-dimer levels,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamad, Mohammed A, Dasuqi, Shereen A, Aleem, Aamer, Omran, Rasha A, AlQahtani, Rakan M, Alhammad, Fahad A, Alzeer, Abdulaziz H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34659762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121211049931
_version_ 1784583792684433408
author Hamad, Mohammed A
Dasuqi, Shereen A
Aleem, Aamer
Omran, Rasha A
AlQahtani, Rakan M
Alhammad, Fahad A
Alzeer, Abdulaziz H
author_facet Hamad, Mohammed A
Dasuqi, Shereen A
Aleem, Aamer
Omran, Rasha A
AlQahtani, Rakan M
Alhammad, Fahad A
Alzeer, Abdulaziz H
author_sort Hamad, Mohammed A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Critically ill COVID-19 patients are at increased risk of thrombosis with an enhanced risk of bleeding. We aimed to explore the role of anti-factor Xa levels in optimizing the high-intensity anticoagulation’s safety and efficacy and finding possible associations between D-dimer levels, cytokine storm markers, and COVID-19-induced coagulopathy or thrombophilia. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study conducted on 69 critically ill COVID-19 patients who received three regimens of higher intensity anticoagulation. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (24.6%) received high-dose enoxaparin prophylaxis, 29 patients (42%) received therapeutic doses of enoxaparin, and 23 patients (33.3%) were on therapeutic unfractionated heparin infusion. Fewer than one-third of the whole cohort (n = 22; 31.8%) achieved the target range of anti-factor Xa. The patients were divided into three subgroups based on anti-factor Xa target status within each anticoagulation regimen; when compared, the only association observed among them was for interleukin-6 levels, which were significantly higher in both the “above the expected range” and “below the expected range” groups compared with the “within the expected range” group (p = 0.009). Major bleeding episodes occurred in 14 (20.3%) patients and were non-significantly more frequent in the “below the expected anti-factor Xa range group” (p = 0.415). Seven patients (10.1%) developed thrombosis. The majority of patients had anti-factor Xa levels below the expected ranges (four patients, 57.1%). CONCLUSION: Conventional anti-factor Xa ranges may not be appropriate as a predictive surrogate for bleeding in critically ill COVID-19. The clinical decision to initiate therapeutic anticoagulation preemptively may be individualized according to thrombosis and bleeding risks. Cytokine storm markers, namely, interleukin-6, may play a role in COVID-19-induced coagulopathy or thrombophilia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8516376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85163762021-10-15 Assessment of anti-factor Xa activity in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving three different anticoagulation regimens Hamad, Mohammed A Dasuqi, Shereen A Aleem, Aamer Omran, Rasha A AlQahtani, Rakan M Alhammad, Fahad A Alzeer, Abdulaziz H SAGE Open Med Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Critically ill COVID-19 patients are at increased risk of thrombosis with an enhanced risk of bleeding. We aimed to explore the role of anti-factor Xa levels in optimizing the high-intensity anticoagulation’s safety and efficacy and finding possible associations between D-dimer levels, cytokine storm markers, and COVID-19-induced coagulopathy or thrombophilia. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study conducted on 69 critically ill COVID-19 patients who received three regimens of higher intensity anticoagulation. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (24.6%) received high-dose enoxaparin prophylaxis, 29 patients (42%) received therapeutic doses of enoxaparin, and 23 patients (33.3%) were on therapeutic unfractionated heparin infusion. Fewer than one-third of the whole cohort (n = 22; 31.8%) achieved the target range of anti-factor Xa. The patients were divided into three subgroups based on anti-factor Xa target status within each anticoagulation regimen; when compared, the only association observed among them was for interleukin-6 levels, which were significantly higher in both the “above the expected range” and “below the expected range” groups compared with the “within the expected range” group (p = 0.009). Major bleeding episodes occurred in 14 (20.3%) patients and were non-significantly more frequent in the “below the expected anti-factor Xa range group” (p = 0.415). Seven patients (10.1%) developed thrombosis. The majority of patients had anti-factor Xa levels below the expected ranges (four patients, 57.1%). CONCLUSION: Conventional anti-factor Xa ranges may not be appropriate as a predictive surrogate for bleeding in critically ill COVID-19. The clinical decision to initiate therapeutic anticoagulation preemptively may be individualized according to thrombosis and bleeding risks. Cytokine storm markers, namely, interleukin-6, may play a role in COVID-19-induced coagulopathy or thrombophilia. SAGE Publications 2021-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8516376/ /pubmed/34659762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121211049931 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Hamad, Mohammed A
Dasuqi, Shereen A
Aleem, Aamer
Omran, Rasha A
AlQahtani, Rakan M
Alhammad, Fahad A
Alzeer, Abdulaziz H
Assessment of anti-factor Xa activity in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving three different anticoagulation regimens
title Assessment of anti-factor Xa activity in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving three different anticoagulation regimens
title_full Assessment of anti-factor Xa activity in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving three different anticoagulation regimens
title_fullStr Assessment of anti-factor Xa activity in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving three different anticoagulation regimens
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of anti-factor Xa activity in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving three different anticoagulation regimens
title_short Assessment of anti-factor Xa activity in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving three different anticoagulation regimens
title_sort assessment of anti-factor xa activity in critically ill covid-19 patients receiving three different anticoagulation regimens
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34659762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121211049931
work_keys_str_mv AT hamadmohammeda assessmentofantifactorxaactivityincriticallyillcovid19patientsreceivingthreedifferentanticoagulationregimens
AT dasuqishereena assessmentofantifactorxaactivityincriticallyillcovid19patientsreceivingthreedifferentanticoagulationregimens
AT aleemaamer assessmentofantifactorxaactivityincriticallyillcovid19patientsreceivingthreedifferentanticoagulationregimens
AT omranrashaa assessmentofantifactorxaactivityincriticallyillcovid19patientsreceivingthreedifferentanticoagulationregimens
AT alqahtanirakanm assessmentofantifactorxaactivityincriticallyillcovid19patientsreceivingthreedifferentanticoagulationregimens
AT alhammadfahada assessmentofantifactorxaactivityincriticallyillcovid19patientsreceivingthreedifferentanticoagulationregimens
AT alzeerabdulazizh assessmentofantifactorxaactivityincriticallyillcovid19patientsreceivingthreedifferentanticoagulationregimens