Cargando…
Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video endoscopy or conventional technique
PURPOSE: To compare the blood flow in the internal thoracic artery when dissected endoscopically in a conventional manner, in addition to develop a reliable experimental training model for the surgical team. METHODS: Paired experimental study. Ten pigs were operated and had both internal thoracic ar...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em
Cirurgia
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ACB360803 |
_version_ | 1784583805867130880 |
---|---|
author | Gib, Marcelo Curcio Zanirati, Thamyres Simas, Pauline Wender, Orlando Carlos Belmonte Cavazzola, Leandro Totti |
author_facet | Gib, Marcelo Curcio Zanirati, Thamyres Simas, Pauline Wender, Orlando Carlos Belmonte Cavazzola, Leandro Totti |
author_sort | Gib, Marcelo Curcio |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the blood flow in the internal thoracic artery when dissected endoscopically in a conventional manner, in addition to develop a reliable experimental training model for the surgical team. METHODS: Paired experimental study. Ten pigs were operated and had both internal thoracic arteries dissected, the right with a conventional technique and the left by video endoscopy. The main outcomes to be studied were flow, length, and time of dissection of each vessel. RESULTS: Blood flow measurements were performed with mean heart rate of 100 ± 16 bpm and mean arterial pressure of 89.7 ± 13 mm Hg. The mean blood flow of endoscopic dissection of the internal thoracic artery was 170.2 ± 66.3 mL/min and by direct view was 180.8 ± 70.5 (p = 0.26). Thus, there was no statistically significant difference between the flows, showing no inferiority between the methods. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive dissection of the internal thoracic artery was shown to be not inferior to the dissection by open technique in relation to the blood flow in the present experimental model. In addition, the model that we replicated was shown to be adequate for the development of the learning curve and improvement of the endoscopic abilities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8516423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em
Cirurgia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85164232021-10-26 Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video endoscopy or conventional technique Gib, Marcelo Curcio Zanirati, Thamyres Simas, Pauline Wender, Orlando Carlos Belmonte Cavazzola, Leandro Totti Acta Cir Bras Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the blood flow in the internal thoracic artery when dissected endoscopically in a conventional manner, in addition to develop a reliable experimental training model for the surgical team. METHODS: Paired experimental study. Ten pigs were operated and had both internal thoracic arteries dissected, the right with a conventional technique and the left by video endoscopy. The main outcomes to be studied were flow, length, and time of dissection of each vessel. RESULTS: Blood flow measurements were performed with mean heart rate of 100 ± 16 bpm and mean arterial pressure of 89.7 ± 13 mm Hg. The mean blood flow of endoscopic dissection of the internal thoracic artery was 170.2 ± 66.3 mL/min and by direct view was 180.8 ± 70.5 (p = 0.26). Thus, there was no statistically significant difference between the flows, showing no inferiority between the methods. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive dissection of the internal thoracic artery was shown to be not inferior to the dissection by open technique in relation to the blood flow in the present experimental model. In addition, the model that we replicated was shown to be adequate for the development of the learning curve and improvement of the endoscopic abilities. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8516423/ /pubmed/34644771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ACB360803 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gib, Marcelo Curcio Zanirati, Thamyres Simas, Pauline Wender, Orlando Carlos Belmonte Cavazzola, Leandro Totti Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video endoscopy or conventional technique |
title | Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video
endoscopy or conventional technique |
title_full | Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video
endoscopy or conventional technique |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video
endoscopy or conventional technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video
endoscopy or conventional technique |
title_short | Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video
endoscopy or conventional technique |
title_sort | comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video
endoscopy or conventional technique |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ACB360803 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gibmarcelocurcio comparisonoftheinternalthoracicarteryflowdissectedbyvideoendoscopyorconventionaltechnique AT zaniratithamyres comparisonoftheinternalthoracicarteryflowdissectedbyvideoendoscopyorconventionaltechnique AT simaspauline comparisonoftheinternalthoracicarteryflowdissectedbyvideoendoscopyorconventionaltechnique AT wenderorlandocarlosbelmonte comparisonoftheinternalthoracicarteryflowdissectedbyvideoendoscopyorconventionaltechnique AT cavazzolaleandrototti comparisonoftheinternalthoracicarteryflowdissectedbyvideoendoscopyorconventionaltechnique |