Cargando…

Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video endoscopy or conventional technique

PURPOSE: To compare the blood flow in the internal thoracic artery when dissected endoscopically in a conventional manner, in addition to develop a reliable experimental training model for the surgical team. METHODS: Paired experimental study. Ten pigs were operated and had both internal thoracic ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gib, Marcelo Curcio, Zanirati, Thamyres, Simas, Pauline, Wender, Orlando Carlos Belmonte, Cavazzola, Leandro Totti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ACB360803
_version_ 1784583805867130880
author Gib, Marcelo Curcio
Zanirati, Thamyres
Simas, Pauline
Wender, Orlando Carlos Belmonte
Cavazzola, Leandro Totti
author_facet Gib, Marcelo Curcio
Zanirati, Thamyres
Simas, Pauline
Wender, Orlando Carlos Belmonte
Cavazzola, Leandro Totti
author_sort Gib, Marcelo Curcio
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the blood flow in the internal thoracic artery when dissected endoscopically in a conventional manner, in addition to develop a reliable experimental training model for the surgical team. METHODS: Paired experimental study. Ten pigs were operated and had both internal thoracic arteries dissected, the right with a conventional technique and the left by video endoscopy. The main outcomes to be studied were flow, length, and time of dissection of each vessel. RESULTS: Blood flow measurements were performed with mean heart rate of 100 ± 16 bpm and mean arterial pressure of 89.7 ± 13 mm Hg. The mean blood flow of endoscopic dissection of the internal thoracic artery was 170.2 ± 66.3 mL/min and by direct view was 180.8 ± 70.5 (p = 0.26). Thus, there was no statistically significant difference between the flows, showing no inferiority between the methods. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive dissection of the internal thoracic artery was shown to be not inferior to the dissection by open technique in relation to the blood flow in the present experimental model. In addition, the model that we replicated was shown to be adequate for the development of the learning curve and improvement of the endoscopic abilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8516423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85164232021-10-26 Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video endoscopy or conventional technique Gib, Marcelo Curcio Zanirati, Thamyres Simas, Pauline Wender, Orlando Carlos Belmonte Cavazzola, Leandro Totti Acta Cir Bras Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the blood flow in the internal thoracic artery when dissected endoscopically in a conventional manner, in addition to develop a reliable experimental training model for the surgical team. METHODS: Paired experimental study. Ten pigs were operated and had both internal thoracic arteries dissected, the right with a conventional technique and the left by video endoscopy. The main outcomes to be studied were flow, length, and time of dissection of each vessel. RESULTS: Blood flow measurements were performed with mean heart rate of 100 ± 16 bpm and mean arterial pressure of 89.7 ± 13 mm Hg. The mean blood flow of endoscopic dissection of the internal thoracic artery was 170.2 ± 66.3 mL/min and by direct view was 180.8 ± 70.5 (p = 0.26). Thus, there was no statistically significant difference between the flows, showing no inferiority between the methods. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive dissection of the internal thoracic artery was shown to be not inferior to the dissection by open technique in relation to the blood flow in the present experimental model. In addition, the model that we replicated was shown to be adequate for the development of the learning curve and improvement of the endoscopic abilities. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8516423/ /pubmed/34644771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ACB360803 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gib, Marcelo Curcio
Zanirati, Thamyres
Simas, Pauline
Wender, Orlando Carlos Belmonte
Cavazzola, Leandro Totti
Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video endoscopy or conventional technique
title Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video endoscopy or conventional technique
title_full Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video endoscopy or conventional technique
title_fullStr Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video endoscopy or conventional technique
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video endoscopy or conventional technique
title_short Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video endoscopy or conventional technique
title_sort comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video endoscopy or conventional technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ACB360803
work_keys_str_mv AT gibmarcelocurcio comparisonoftheinternalthoracicarteryflowdissectedbyvideoendoscopyorconventionaltechnique
AT zaniratithamyres comparisonoftheinternalthoracicarteryflowdissectedbyvideoendoscopyorconventionaltechnique
AT simaspauline comparisonoftheinternalthoracicarteryflowdissectedbyvideoendoscopyorconventionaltechnique
AT wenderorlandocarlosbelmonte comparisonoftheinternalthoracicarteryflowdissectedbyvideoendoscopyorconventionaltechnique
AT cavazzolaleandrototti comparisonoftheinternalthoracicarteryflowdissectedbyvideoendoscopyorconventionaltechnique