Cargando…

Immunogenicity and Safety of the COVID-19 Vaccines Compared With Control in Healthy Adults: A Qualitative and Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES: Emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections and the resultant disease, COVID-19 led the world into 238 million cases and 4.8 million deaths over the first 22 months of the pandemic. While numerous vaccines have been developed to combat this pandemic, limited l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lau, Oscar, Vadlamudi, Nirma Khatri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35500945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.09.003
_version_ 1784583810727280640
author Lau, Oscar
Vadlamudi, Nirma Khatri
author_facet Lau, Oscar
Vadlamudi, Nirma Khatri
author_sort Lau, Oscar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections and the resultant disease, COVID-19 led the world into 238 million cases and 4.8 million deaths over the first 22 months of the pandemic. While numerous vaccines have been developed to combat this pandemic, limited literature is available regarding the comparison of these vaccines. This study aims to systematically review and evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines compared with control arms in the healthy adult population. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane up to July 4, 2021. Randomized controlled trials assessing the immunogenicity of any dose of COVID-19 vaccine in adults by anti–severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 immunoglobulin G antibodies geometric mean titers (GMTs) and neutralizing antibodies GMT response at 28 days postimmunization compared with the control groups in the healthy adults were considered for inclusion. Groups at day 28 with the highest GMT were further examined for their adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 341 citations retrieved, 19 were included. This covered a total of 16 vaccines involving 8342 subjects aged between 30.8 and 69.7 years, comprising 52.13% females. All studies reported GMT at or close to 28 days postvaccination compared with placebo and comparator, and 13 of 19 studies reported seroconversion rates. While 15 of 16 vaccines reported adverse events that ranged from mild to severe, 1 of 16 (AD26.COV2.S) noted 1 case of a vaccine-related serious adverse event—high fever 6 hours after vaccination. Local reactions (such as redness, pain, and swelling) and systematic reactions (such as fatigue, fever, and headache) were commonly noted. Safety between vaccines was similar; however, higher rates of severe adverse events were noted in Ad5-vectored COVID-19, AD26.COV2.S, ChAdOx nCoV-19, and mRNA-1273. No all-cause mortality was documented in any vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: All 16 vaccines elicited an immune response substantially higher than the control groups while maintaining tolerable safety profiles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8516444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85164442021-10-15 Immunogenicity and Safety of the COVID-19 Vaccines Compared With Control in Healthy Adults: A Qualitative and Systematic Review Lau, Oscar Vadlamudi, Nirma Khatri Value Health Themed Section: COVID-19 OBJECTIVES: Emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections and the resultant disease, COVID-19 led the world into 238 million cases and 4.8 million deaths over the first 22 months of the pandemic. While numerous vaccines have been developed to combat this pandemic, limited literature is available regarding the comparison of these vaccines. This study aims to systematically review and evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines compared with control arms in the healthy adult population. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane up to July 4, 2021. Randomized controlled trials assessing the immunogenicity of any dose of COVID-19 vaccine in adults by anti–severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 immunoglobulin G antibodies geometric mean titers (GMTs) and neutralizing antibodies GMT response at 28 days postimmunization compared with the control groups in the healthy adults were considered for inclusion. Groups at day 28 with the highest GMT were further examined for their adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 341 citations retrieved, 19 were included. This covered a total of 16 vaccines involving 8342 subjects aged between 30.8 and 69.7 years, comprising 52.13% females. All studies reported GMT at or close to 28 days postvaccination compared with placebo and comparator, and 13 of 19 studies reported seroconversion rates. While 15 of 16 vaccines reported adverse events that ranged from mild to severe, 1 of 16 (AD26.COV2.S) noted 1 case of a vaccine-related serious adverse event—high fever 6 hours after vaccination. Local reactions (such as redness, pain, and swelling) and systematic reactions (such as fatigue, fever, and headache) were commonly noted. Safety between vaccines was similar; however, higher rates of severe adverse events were noted in Ad5-vectored COVID-19, AD26.COV2.S, ChAdOx nCoV-19, and mRNA-1273. No all-cause mortality was documented in any vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: All 16 vaccines elicited an immune response substantially higher than the control groups while maintaining tolerable safety profiles. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 2022-05 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8516444/ /pubmed/35500945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.09.003 Text en © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Themed Section: COVID-19
Lau, Oscar
Vadlamudi, Nirma Khatri
Immunogenicity and Safety of the COVID-19 Vaccines Compared With Control in Healthy Adults: A Qualitative and Systematic Review
title Immunogenicity and Safety of the COVID-19 Vaccines Compared With Control in Healthy Adults: A Qualitative and Systematic Review
title_full Immunogenicity and Safety of the COVID-19 Vaccines Compared With Control in Healthy Adults: A Qualitative and Systematic Review
title_fullStr Immunogenicity and Safety of the COVID-19 Vaccines Compared With Control in Healthy Adults: A Qualitative and Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Immunogenicity and Safety of the COVID-19 Vaccines Compared With Control in Healthy Adults: A Qualitative and Systematic Review
title_short Immunogenicity and Safety of the COVID-19 Vaccines Compared With Control in Healthy Adults: A Qualitative and Systematic Review
title_sort immunogenicity and safety of the covid-19 vaccines compared with control in healthy adults: a qualitative and systematic review
topic Themed Section: COVID-19
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35500945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.09.003
work_keys_str_mv AT lauoscar immunogenicityandsafetyofthecovid19vaccinescomparedwithcontrolinhealthyadultsaqualitativeandsystematicreview
AT vadlamudinirmakhatri immunogenicityandsafetyofthecovid19vaccinescomparedwithcontrolinhealthyadultsaqualitativeandsystematicreview