Cargando…

Postoperative Management Strategy of Surgical Site Infection following Lumbar Dynesys Dynamic Internal Fixation

AIM: To research the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) following lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation and its management strategy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all cases of lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation performed from January 2010 to December 2019, and the data from p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Liehua, Luo, Lei, Zhao, Chen, Zhou, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34659599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2262837
_version_ 1784583822580383744
author Liu, Liehua
Luo, Lei
Zhao, Chen
Zhou, Qiang
author_facet Liu, Liehua
Luo, Lei
Zhao, Chen
Zhou, Qiang
author_sort Liu, Liehua
collection PubMed
description AIM: To research the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) following lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation and its management strategy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all cases of lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation performed from January 2010 to December 2019, and the data from patients with SSI were collected. The observational indicators included the incidence of SSI, general information of the patients, surgical details, inflammatory indicators, pathogenic bacteria, and treatment. SSI was defined as both early infection and delayed infection, and the cases were divided into Groups A and B, respectively. The relevant indicators and treatment were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 1125 cases of lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation were followed up. Twenty-five cases of SSI occurred, and the incidence of SSI was 2.22% (25/1125). There were 14 cases of early infection (1.24%) and 11 cases of delayed infection (0.98%). Fourteen cases of early infection occurred 12.3 ± 8.3 days postoperatively (3–30), and 11 cases of delayed infection occurred 33.3 ± 18.9 months postoperatively (3–62). The inflammatory indicators of Group A were significantly higher than those of Group B (all P < 0.05), except for procalcitonin. The main infection site in Group A was located on the skin and subcutaneous tissue and around the internal instrument, while the main infection site in Group B was around the internal instrument. The main treatment for Group A was debridement and implant replacement, and the main treatment for Group B was implant removal. Summary. The incidence of SSI following lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation was 2.22%, the incidence of early SSI was 1.24%, and the incidence of delayed SSI was 0.98%. If the main infection site of early infection is in the incision, debridement should be the main treatment method; if the infection site is around the internal fixation, implant replacement is recommended on the basis of debridement. Once delayed infection is diagnosed, implant removal is suggested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8516528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85165282021-10-15 Postoperative Management Strategy of Surgical Site Infection following Lumbar Dynesys Dynamic Internal Fixation Liu, Liehua Luo, Lei Zhao, Chen Zhou, Qiang Pain Res Manag Research Article AIM: To research the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) following lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation and its management strategy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all cases of lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation performed from January 2010 to December 2019, and the data from patients with SSI were collected. The observational indicators included the incidence of SSI, general information of the patients, surgical details, inflammatory indicators, pathogenic bacteria, and treatment. SSI was defined as both early infection and delayed infection, and the cases were divided into Groups A and B, respectively. The relevant indicators and treatment were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 1125 cases of lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation were followed up. Twenty-five cases of SSI occurred, and the incidence of SSI was 2.22% (25/1125). There were 14 cases of early infection (1.24%) and 11 cases of delayed infection (0.98%). Fourteen cases of early infection occurred 12.3 ± 8.3 days postoperatively (3–30), and 11 cases of delayed infection occurred 33.3 ± 18.9 months postoperatively (3–62). The inflammatory indicators of Group A were significantly higher than those of Group B (all P < 0.05), except for procalcitonin. The main infection site in Group A was located on the skin and subcutaneous tissue and around the internal instrument, while the main infection site in Group B was around the internal instrument. The main treatment for Group A was debridement and implant replacement, and the main treatment for Group B was implant removal. Summary. The incidence of SSI following lumbar Dynesys dynamic internal fixation was 2.22%, the incidence of early SSI was 1.24%, and the incidence of delayed SSI was 0.98%. If the main infection site of early infection is in the incision, debridement should be the main treatment method; if the infection site is around the internal fixation, implant replacement is recommended on the basis of debridement. Once delayed infection is diagnosed, implant removal is suggested. Hindawi 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8516528/ /pubmed/34659599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2262837 Text en Copyright © 2021 Liehua Liu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Liehua
Luo, Lei
Zhao, Chen
Zhou, Qiang
Postoperative Management Strategy of Surgical Site Infection following Lumbar Dynesys Dynamic Internal Fixation
title Postoperative Management Strategy of Surgical Site Infection following Lumbar Dynesys Dynamic Internal Fixation
title_full Postoperative Management Strategy of Surgical Site Infection following Lumbar Dynesys Dynamic Internal Fixation
title_fullStr Postoperative Management Strategy of Surgical Site Infection following Lumbar Dynesys Dynamic Internal Fixation
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative Management Strategy of Surgical Site Infection following Lumbar Dynesys Dynamic Internal Fixation
title_short Postoperative Management Strategy of Surgical Site Infection following Lumbar Dynesys Dynamic Internal Fixation
title_sort postoperative management strategy of surgical site infection following lumbar dynesys dynamic internal fixation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34659599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2262837
work_keys_str_mv AT liuliehua postoperativemanagementstrategyofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinglumbardynesysdynamicinternalfixation
AT luolei postoperativemanagementstrategyofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinglumbardynesysdynamicinternalfixation
AT zhaochen postoperativemanagementstrategyofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinglumbardynesysdynamicinternalfixation
AT zhouqiang postoperativemanagementstrategyofsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinglumbardynesysdynamicinternalfixation