Cargando…

Adherence to the ABCDE approach in relation to the method of instruction: a randomized controlled simulation study

BACKGROUND: The Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, and Exposure (ABCDE) approach is widely recommended and taught in many resuscitation courses. This study assessed the adherence to the ABCDE algorithm and whether this was affected by the instruction method used to teach this approach. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linders, Marjolein, Binkhorst, Mathijs, Draaisma, Jos M. T., van Heijst, Arno F. J., Hogeveen, Marije
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34654364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00509-0
_version_ 1784583984770973696
author Linders, Marjolein
Binkhorst, Mathijs
Draaisma, Jos M. T.
van Heijst, Arno F. J.
Hogeveen, Marije
author_facet Linders, Marjolein
Binkhorst, Mathijs
Draaisma, Jos M. T.
van Heijst, Arno F. J.
Hogeveen, Marije
author_sort Linders, Marjolein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, and Exposure (ABCDE) approach is widely recommended and taught in many resuscitation courses. This study assessed the adherence to the ABCDE algorithm and whether this was affected by the instruction method used to teach this approach. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial in which simulation was used as investigational method. Between June 2017 and January 2018, neonatal healthcare providers routinely participated in simulated neonatal advanced life support (NALS) scenarios, using a high-fidelity manikin. They were randomly assigned to a video-based instruction (intervention group) or a conventional lecture (control group) as the method of instruction. One blinded researcher evaluated the adherence to the ABCDE approach on video with an assessment tool specifically designed and tested for this study. The primary outcomes were: 1) the overall adherence and 2) the between-group difference in individual adherence to the ABCDE approach, both expressed as a percentage score. Secondary outcomes were: 1) the scores of each profession category (nurses, neonatal ward clinicians, fellows/neonatologists) and 2) the scores for the separate domains (A, B, C, D, and E) of the algorithm. RESULTS: Seventy-two participants were assessed. Overall mean (SD) percentage score (i.e. overall adherence) was 31.5% (19.0). The video-based instruction group (28 participants) adhered better to the ABCDE approach than the lecture group (44 participants), with mean (SD) scores of 38.8% (18.7) and 27.8% (18.2), respectively (p = 0.026). The difference in adherence between both groups could mainly be attributed to differences in the adherence to domain B (p = 0.023) and C (p = 0.007). Neonatal ward clinicians (39.9% (18.2)) showed better adherence than nurses (25.0% (15.2)), independent of the study group (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Overall adherence to the ABCDE algorithm was rather low. Video-based instruction resulted in better adherence to the ABCDE approach during NALS training than lecturing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry, trial ID ISRCTN95998973, retrospectively registered on October 13th, 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00509-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8517297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85172972021-10-15 Adherence to the ABCDE approach in relation to the method of instruction: a randomized controlled simulation study Linders, Marjolein Binkhorst, Mathijs Draaisma, Jos M. T. van Heijst, Arno F. J. Hogeveen, Marije BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, and Exposure (ABCDE) approach is widely recommended and taught in many resuscitation courses. This study assessed the adherence to the ABCDE algorithm and whether this was affected by the instruction method used to teach this approach. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial in which simulation was used as investigational method. Between June 2017 and January 2018, neonatal healthcare providers routinely participated in simulated neonatal advanced life support (NALS) scenarios, using a high-fidelity manikin. They were randomly assigned to a video-based instruction (intervention group) or a conventional lecture (control group) as the method of instruction. One blinded researcher evaluated the adherence to the ABCDE approach on video with an assessment tool specifically designed and tested for this study. The primary outcomes were: 1) the overall adherence and 2) the between-group difference in individual adherence to the ABCDE approach, both expressed as a percentage score. Secondary outcomes were: 1) the scores of each profession category (nurses, neonatal ward clinicians, fellows/neonatologists) and 2) the scores for the separate domains (A, B, C, D, and E) of the algorithm. RESULTS: Seventy-two participants were assessed. Overall mean (SD) percentage score (i.e. overall adherence) was 31.5% (19.0). The video-based instruction group (28 participants) adhered better to the ABCDE approach than the lecture group (44 participants), with mean (SD) scores of 38.8% (18.7) and 27.8% (18.2), respectively (p = 0.026). The difference in adherence between both groups could mainly be attributed to differences in the adherence to domain B (p = 0.023) and C (p = 0.007). Neonatal ward clinicians (39.9% (18.2)) showed better adherence than nurses (25.0% (15.2)), independent of the study group (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Overall adherence to the ABCDE algorithm was rather low. Video-based instruction resulted in better adherence to the ABCDE approach during NALS training than lecturing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry, trial ID ISRCTN95998973, retrospectively registered on October 13th, 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00509-0. BioMed Central 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8517297/ /pubmed/34654364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00509-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Linders, Marjolein
Binkhorst, Mathijs
Draaisma, Jos M. T.
van Heijst, Arno F. J.
Hogeveen, Marije
Adherence to the ABCDE approach in relation to the method of instruction: a randomized controlled simulation study
title Adherence to the ABCDE approach in relation to the method of instruction: a randomized controlled simulation study
title_full Adherence to the ABCDE approach in relation to the method of instruction: a randomized controlled simulation study
title_fullStr Adherence to the ABCDE approach in relation to the method of instruction: a randomized controlled simulation study
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to the ABCDE approach in relation to the method of instruction: a randomized controlled simulation study
title_short Adherence to the ABCDE approach in relation to the method of instruction: a randomized controlled simulation study
title_sort adherence to the abcde approach in relation to the method of instruction: a randomized controlled simulation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34654364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00509-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lindersmarjolein adherencetotheabcdeapproachinrelationtothemethodofinstructionarandomizedcontrolledsimulationstudy
AT binkhorstmathijs adherencetotheabcdeapproachinrelationtothemethodofinstructionarandomizedcontrolledsimulationstudy
AT draaismajosmt adherencetotheabcdeapproachinrelationtothemethodofinstructionarandomizedcontrolledsimulationstudy
AT vanheijstarnofj adherencetotheabcdeapproachinrelationtothemethodofinstructionarandomizedcontrolledsimulationstudy
AT hogeveenmarije adherencetotheabcdeapproachinrelationtothemethodofinstructionarandomizedcontrolledsimulationstudy