Cargando…

Do We Need Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in All Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Adenoma Surgery Cases? A Retrospective Study

There are previous reports investigating effectiveness of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (IO-MRI) in pituitary adenoma surgery but there is no clear data in the literature recommending when there is no need of intraoperative scan. This retrospective analysis was based on determining which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Celtikci, Emrah, Sahin, Muammer Melih, Sahin, Mustafa Caglar, Cindil, Emetullah, Demirtaş, Zuhal, Emmez, Hakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660296
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.733838
_version_ 1784584015756394496
author Celtikci, Emrah
Sahin, Muammer Melih
Sahin, Mustafa Caglar
Cindil, Emetullah
Demirtaş, Zuhal
Emmez, Hakan
author_facet Celtikci, Emrah
Sahin, Muammer Melih
Sahin, Mustafa Caglar
Cindil, Emetullah
Demirtaş, Zuhal
Emmez, Hakan
author_sort Celtikci, Emrah
collection PubMed
description There are previous reports investigating effectiveness of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (IO-MRI) in pituitary adenoma surgery but there is no clear data in the literature recommending when there is no need of intraoperative scan. This retrospective analysis was based on determining which patients does not need any IO-MRI scan following endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma surgery. Patients with functional or non-functional pituitary adenomas that were operated via endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) between June 2017 and May 2019 were enrolled. Patients younger than 18 years old, patients who did not underwent IO-MRI procedure or not operated via EEA were excluded from the study. Hence, this study is designed to clarify if IO-MRI is useful in both functional and non-functional pituitary adenomas, functional adenomas did not split into subgroups. A total of 200 patients treated with pituitary adenoma were included. In Knosp Grade 0 – 2 group, primary surgeon’s opinion and IO-MRI findings were compatible in 150 patients (98.6%). In Knosp Grade 3 – 4 correct prediction were performed in 32 (66.6%) patients. When incorrectly predicted Knosp Grade 3 – 4 patients (n = 16) was analyzed, in 13 patients there were still residual tumor in cavernous sinus and in 3 patients there were no residual tumor. Fisher’s exact test showed there is a statistically significant difference of correct prediction between two different Knosp Grade groups (two-tailed P < 0.0001). Eighteen patients had a residual tumor extending to the suprasellar and parasellar regions which second most common site for residual tumor. Our findings demonstrate that there is no need of IO-MRI scan while operating adenomas limited in the sellae and not invading the cavernous sinus. However, we strongly recommend IO-MRI if there is any suprasellar and parasellar extension and/or cavernous sinus invasion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8517430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85174302021-10-16 Do We Need Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in All Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Adenoma Surgery Cases? A Retrospective Study Celtikci, Emrah Sahin, Muammer Melih Sahin, Mustafa Caglar Cindil, Emetullah Demirtaş, Zuhal Emmez, Hakan Front Oncol Oncology There are previous reports investigating effectiveness of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (IO-MRI) in pituitary adenoma surgery but there is no clear data in the literature recommending when there is no need of intraoperative scan. This retrospective analysis was based on determining which patients does not need any IO-MRI scan following endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma surgery. Patients with functional or non-functional pituitary adenomas that were operated via endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) between June 2017 and May 2019 were enrolled. Patients younger than 18 years old, patients who did not underwent IO-MRI procedure or not operated via EEA were excluded from the study. Hence, this study is designed to clarify if IO-MRI is useful in both functional and non-functional pituitary adenomas, functional adenomas did not split into subgroups. A total of 200 patients treated with pituitary adenoma were included. In Knosp Grade 0 – 2 group, primary surgeon’s opinion and IO-MRI findings were compatible in 150 patients (98.6%). In Knosp Grade 3 – 4 correct prediction were performed in 32 (66.6%) patients. When incorrectly predicted Knosp Grade 3 – 4 patients (n = 16) was analyzed, in 13 patients there were still residual tumor in cavernous sinus and in 3 patients there were no residual tumor. Fisher’s exact test showed there is a statistically significant difference of correct prediction between two different Knosp Grade groups (two-tailed P < 0.0001). Eighteen patients had a residual tumor extending to the suprasellar and parasellar regions which second most common site for residual tumor. Our findings demonstrate that there is no need of IO-MRI scan while operating adenomas limited in the sellae and not invading the cavernous sinus. However, we strongly recommend IO-MRI if there is any suprasellar and parasellar extension and/or cavernous sinus invasion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8517430/ /pubmed/34660296 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.733838 Text en Copyright © 2021 Celtikci, Sahin, Sahin, Cindil, Demirtaş and Emmez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Celtikci, Emrah
Sahin, Muammer Melih
Sahin, Mustafa Caglar
Cindil, Emetullah
Demirtaş, Zuhal
Emmez, Hakan
Do We Need Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in All Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Adenoma Surgery Cases? A Retrospective Study
title Do We Need Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in All Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Adenoma Surgery Cases? A Retrospective Study
title_full Do We Need Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in All Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Adenoma Surgery Cases? A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Do We Need Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in All Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Adenoma Surgery Cases? A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Do We Need Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in All Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Adenoma Surgery Cases? A Retrospective Study
title_short Do We Need Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in All Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Adenoma Surgery Cases? A Retrospective Study
title_sort do we need intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in all endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma surgery cases? a retrospective study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660296
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.733838
work_keys_str_mv AT celtikciemrah doweneedintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginallendoscopicendonasalpituitaryadenomasurgerycasesaretrospectivestudy
AT sahinmuammermelih doweneedintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginallendoscopicendonasalpituitaryadenomasurgerycasesaretrospectivestudy
AT sahinmustafacaglar doweneedintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginallendoscopicendonasalpituitaryadenomasurgerycasesaretrospectivestudy
AT cindilemetullah doweneedintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginallendoscopicendonasalpituitaryadenomasurgerycasesaretrospectivestudy
AT demirtaszuhal doweneedintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginallendoscopicendonasalpituitaryadenomasurgerycasesaretrospectivestudy
AT emmezhakan doweneedintraoperativemagneticresonanceimaginginallendoscopicendonasalpituitaryadenomasurgerycasesaretrospectivestudy