Cargando…

A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prostate Cancer Patients With or Without 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Prior to Salvage Radiotherapy of the Prostatic Fossa

INTRODUCTION: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is associated with unprecedented sensitivity for localization of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer at low PSA levels prior to radiotherapy. Aim of the present analysis is to examine whether patients undergoing postoperative, salvage radiotherapy (sRT) of the pros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmidt-Hegemann, Nina-Sophie, Zamboglou, Constantinos, Thamm, Reinhard, Eze, Chukwuka, Kirste, Simon, Spohn, Simon, Li, Minglun, Stief, Christian, Bolenz, Christian, Schultze-Seemann, Wolfgang, Bartenstein, Peter, Prasad, Vikas, Ganswindt, Ute, Grosu, Anca-Ligia, Belka, Claus, Mayer, Benjamin, Wiegel, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660290
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.723536
_version_ 1784584027209990144
author Schmidt-Hegemann, Nina-Sophie
Zamboglou, Constantinos
Thamm, Reinhard
Eze, Chukwuka
Kirste, Simon
Spohn, Simon
Li, Minglun
Stief, Christian
Bolenz, Christian
Schultze-Seemann, Wolfgang
Bartenstein, Peter
Prasad, Vikas
Ganswindt, Ute
Grosu, Anca-Ligia
Belka, Claus
Mayer, Benjamin
Wiegel, Thomas
author_facet Schmidt-Hegemann, Nina-Sophie
Zamboglou, Constantinos
Thamm, Reinhard
Eze, Chukwuka
Kirste, Simon
Spohn, Simon
Li, Minglun
Stief, Christian
Bolenz, Christian
Schultze-Seemann, Wolfgang
Bartenstein, Peter
Prasad, Vikas
Ganswindt, Ute
Grosu, Anca-Ligia
Belka, Claus
Mayer, Benjamin
Wiegel, Thomas
author_sort Schmidt-Hegemann, Nina-Sophie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is associated with unprecedented sensitivity for localization of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer at low PSA levels prior to radiotherapy. Aim of the present analysis is to examine whether patients undergoing postoperative, salvage radiotherapy (sRT) of the prostatic fossa with no known nodal or distant metastases on conventional imaging (CT and/or MRI) and on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) will have an improved biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) compared to patients with no known nodal or distant metastases on conventional imaging only. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis is based on 459 patients (95 with and 364 without 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT). BRFS (PSA < post-sRT Nadir + 0.2 ng/ml) was the primary study endpoint. This was first analysed by Kaplan-Meier and uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis for the entire cohort and then again after matched-pair analysis using tumor stage, Gleason score, PSA at time of sRT and radiation dose as matching parameters. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 77.5 months for patients without and 33 months for patients with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. For the entire cohort, tumor stage (pT2 vs. pT3-4; p= <0.001), Gleason score (GS ≤ 7 vs. GS8-10; p=0.003), pre-sRT PSA (<0.5 vs. ≥0.5ng/ml; p<0.001) and sRT dose (<70 vs. ≥70Gy; p<0.001) were the only factors significantly associated with improved BRFS. This was not seen for the use of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT prior to sRT (p=0.789). Matched-pair analysis consisted of 95 pairs of PCa patients with or without PET/CT and no significant difference in BRFS based on the use of PET/CT was evident (p=0.884). CONCLUSION: This analysis did not show an improvement in BRFS using 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT prior to sRT neither for the entire cohort nor after matched-pair analysis after excluding patients with PET-positive lymph node or distant metastases a priori. As no improved BRFS resulted with implementation of 68Ga-PSMA PET in sRT planning, sRT should not be deferred until the best “diagnostic window” for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8517476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85174762021-10-16 A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prostate Cancer Patients With or Without 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Prior to Salvage Radiotherapy of the Prostatic Fossa Schmidt-Hegemann, Nina-Sophie Zamboglou, Constantinos Thamm, Reinhard Eze, Chukwuka Kirste, Simon Spohn, Simon Li, Minglun Stief, Christian Bolenz, Christian Schultze-Seemann, Wolfgang Bartenstein, Peter Prasad, Vikas Ganswindt, Ute Grosu, Anca-Ligia Belka, Claus Mayer, Benjamin Wiegel, Thomas Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is associated with unprecedented sensitivity for localization of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer at low PSA levels prior to radiotherapy. Aim of the present analysis is to examine whether patients undergoing postoperative, salvage radiotherapy (sRT) of the prostatic fossa with no known nodal or distant metastases on conventional imaging (CT and/or MRI) and on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) will have an improved biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) compared to patients with no known nodal or distant metastases on conventional imaging only. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis is based on 459 patients (95 with and 364 without 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT). BRFS (PSA < post-sRT Nadir + 0.2 ng/ml) was the primary study endpoint. This was first analysed by Kaplan-Meier and uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis for the entire cohort and then again after matched-pair analysis using tumor stage, Gleason score, PSA at time of sRT and radiation dose as matching parameters. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 77.5 months for patients without and 33 months for patients with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. For the entire cohort, tumor stage (pT2 vs. pT3-4; p= <0.001), Gleason score (GS ≤ 7 vs. GS8-10; p=0.003), pre-sRT PSA (<0.5 vs. ≥0.5ng/ml; p<0.001) and sRT dose (<70 vs. ≥70Gy; p<0.001) were the only factors significantly associated with improved BRFS. This was not seen for the use of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT prior to sRT (p=0.789). Matched-pair analysis consisted of 95 pairs of PCa patients with or without PET/CT and no significant difference in BRFS based on the use of PET/CT was evident (p=0.884). CONCLUSION: This analysis did not show an improvement in BRFS using 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT prior to sRT neither for the entire cohort nor after matched-pair analysis after excluding patients with PET-positive lymph node or distant metastases a priori. As no improved BRFS resulted with implementation of 68Ga-PSMA PET in sRT planning, sRT should not be deferred until the best “diagnostic window” for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8517476/ /pubmed/34660290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.723536 Text en Copyright © 2021 Schmidt-Hegemann, Zamboglou, Thamm, Eze, Kirste, Spohn, Li, Stief, Bolenz, Schultze-Seemann, Bartenstein, Prasad, Ganswindt, Grosu, Belka, Mayer and Wiegel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Schmidt-Hegemann, Nina-Sophie
Zamboglou, Constantinos
Thamm, Reinhard
Eze, Chukwuka
Kirste, Simon
Spohn, Simon
Li, Minglun
Stief, Christian
Bolenz, Christian
Schultze-Seemann, Wolfgang
Bartenstein, Peter
Prasad, Vikas
Ganswindt, Ute
Grosu, Anca-Ligia
Belka, Claus
Mayer, Benjamin
Wiegel, Thomas
A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prostate Cancer Patients With or Without 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Prior to Salvage Radiotherapy of the Prostatic Fossa
title A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prostate Cancer Patients With or Without 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Prior to Salvage Radiotherapy of the Prostatic Fossa
title_full A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prostate Cancer Patients With or Without 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Prior to Salvage Radiotherapy of the Prostatic Fossa
title_fullStr A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prostate Cancer Patients With or Without 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Prior to Salvage Radiotherapy of the Prostatic Fossa
title_full_unstemmed A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prostate Cancer Patients With or Without 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Prior to Salvage Radiotherapy of the Prostatic Fossa
title_short A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Prostate Cancer Patients With or Without 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Prior to Salvage Radiotherapy of the Prostatic Fossa
title_sort multi-institutional analysis of prostate cancer patients with or without 68ga-psma pet/ct prior to salvage radiotherapy of the prostatic fossa
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660290
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.723536
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidthegemannninasophie amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT zamboglouconstantinos amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT thammreinhard amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT ezechukwuka amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT kirstesimon amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT spohnsimon amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT liminglun amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT stiefchristian amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT bolenzchristian amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT schultzeseemannwolfgang amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT bartensteinpeter amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT prasadvikas amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT ganswindtute amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT grosuancaligia amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT belkaclaus amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT mayerbenjamin amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT wiegelthomas amultiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT schmidthegemannninasophie multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT zamboglouconstantinos multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT thammreinhard multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT ezechukwuka multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT kirstesimon multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT spohnsimon multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT liminglun multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT stiefchristian multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT bolenzchristian multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT schultzeseemannwolfgang multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT bartensteinpeter multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT prasadvikas multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT ganswindtute multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT grosuancaligia multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT belkaclaus multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT mayerbenjamin multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa
AT wiegelthomas multiinstitutionalanalysisofprostatecancerpatientswithorwithout68gapsmapetctpriortosalvageradiotherapyoftheprostaticfossa