Cargando…

External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities

Background: Learning disabilities (LDs) are a major public health issue, affecting cognitive functions and academic performance for 8% of children. If LDs are not detected early and addressed through appropriate interventions, they have a heavy impact on these children in the social, educational, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Billard, Catherine, Jung, Camille, Munnich, Arnold, Gassama, Sahawanatou, Touzin, Monique, Mirassou, Anne, Willig, Thiébaut-Noël
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660490
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.733713
_version_ 1784584033386102784
author Billard, Catherine
Jung, Camille
Munnich, Arnold
Gassama, Sahawanatou
Touzin, Monique
Mirassou, Anne
Willig, Thiébaut-Noël
author_facet Billard, Catherine
Jung, Camille
Munnich, Arnold
Gassama, Sahawanatou
Touzin, Monique
Mirassou, Anne
Willig, Thiébaut-Noël
author_sort Billard, Catherine
collection PubMed
description Background: Learning disabilities (LDs) are a major public health issue, affecting cognitive functions and academic performance for 8% of children. If LDs are not detected early and addressed through appropriate interventions, they have a heavy impact on these children in the social, educational, and professional spheres, at great cost to society. The BMT-i (Batterie Modulable de Tests informatisée, or “computerized Adaptable Test Battery”) enables fast, easy, reliable assessments for each cognitive domain. It has previously been validated in children ages 4–13 who had no prior complaints. The present study demonstrates the sensitivity of the BMT-i, relative to reference test batteries, for 191 children with cognitive difficulties. Materials and Methods: These 191 subjects were included in the study by the 14 pediatricians treating them for complaints in five cognitive domains: written language [60 (cases)]; mathematical cognition (40); oral language (60); handwriting, drawing, and visuospatial construction (45); and attention and executive functioning (45). In accordance with a predefined protocol, the children were administered BMT-i tests first, by their pediatricians, and reference tests later, by specialists to whom the BMT-i test results were not disclosed. Comparison of BMT-i and reference test results made it possible to evaluate sensitivity and agreement between tests. Results: For each of the five domains, the BMT-i was very sensitive (0.91–1), and normal BMT-i results were highly predictive of normal results for specialized reference tests [negative likelihood ratio (LR–): 0–0.16]. There was close agreement between BMT-i and reference tests in all domains except attention and executive functioning, for which only moderate agreement was observed. Conclusion: The BMT-i offers rapid, reliable, simple computerized assessments whose sensitivity and agreement with reference test batteries make it a suitable first-line instrument for LD screening in children 4–13 years old.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8517505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85175052021-10-16 External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities Billard, Catherine Jung, Camille Munnich, Arnold Gassama, Sahawanatou Touzin, Monique Mirassou, Anne Willig, Thiébaut-Noël Front Pediatr Pediatrics Background: Learning disabilities (LDs) are a major public health issue, affecting cognitive functions and academic performance for 8% of children. If LDs are not detected early and addressed through appropriate interventions, they have a heavy impact on these children in the social, educational, and professional spheres, at great cost to society. The BMT-i (Batterie Modulable de Tests informatisée, or “computerized Adaptable Test Battery”) enables fast, easy, reliable assessments for each cognitive domain. It has previously been validated in children ages 4–13 who had no prior complaints. The present study demonstrates the sensitivity of the BMT-i, relative to reference test batteries, for 191 children with cognitive difficulties. Materials and Methods: These 191 subjects were included in the study by the 14 pediatricians treating them for complaints in five cognitive domains: written language [60 (cases)]; mathematical cognition (40); oral language (60); handwriting, drawing, and visuospatial construction (45); and attention and executive functioning (45). In accordance with a predefined protocol, the children were administered BMT-i tests first, by their pediatricians, and reference tests later, by specialists to whom the BMT-i test results were not disclosed. Comparison of BMT-i and reference test results made it possible to evaluate sensitivity and agreement between tests. Results: For each of the five domains, the BMT-i was very sensitive (0.91–1), and normal BMT-i results were highly predictive of normal results for specialized reference tests [negative likelihood ratio (LR–): 0–0.16]. There was close agreement between BMT-i and reference tests in all domains except attention and executive functioning, for which only moderate agreement was observed. Conclusion: The BMT-i offers rapid, reliable, simple computerized assessments whose sensitivity and agreement with reference test batteries make it a suitable first-line instrument for LD screening in children 4–13 years old. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8517505/ /pubmed/34660490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.733713 Text en Copyright © 2021 Billard, Jung, Munnich, Gassama, Touzin, Mirassou and Willig. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Billard, Catherine
Jung, Camille
Munnich, Arnold
Gassama, Sahawanatou
Touzin, Monique
Mirassou, Anne
Willig, Thiébaut-Noël
External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities
title External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities
title_full External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities
title_fullStr External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities
title_full_unstemmed External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities
title_short External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities
title_sort external validation of bmt-i computerized test battery for diagnosis of learning disabilities
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660490
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.733713
work_keys_str_mv AT billardcatherine externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities
AT jungcamille externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities
AT munnicharnold externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities
AT gassamasahawanatou externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities
AT touzinmonique externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities
AT mirassouanne externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities
AT willigthiebautnoel externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities