Cargando…
External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities
Background: Learning disabilities (LDs) are a major public health issue, affecting cognitive functions and academic performance for 8% of children. If LDs are not detected early and addressed through appropriate interventions, they have a heavy impact on these children in the social, educational, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.733713 |
_version_ | 1784584033386102784 |
---|---|
author | Billard, Catherine Jung, Camille Munnich, Arnold Gassama, Sahawanatou Touzin, Monique Mirassou, Anne Willig, Thiébaut-Noël |
author_facet | Billard, Catherine Jung, Camille Munnich, Arnold Gassama, Sahawanatou Touzin, Monique Mirassou, Anne Willig, Thiébaut-Noël |
author_sort | Billard, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Learning disabilities (LDs) are a major public health issue, affecting cognitive functions and academic performance for 8% of children. If LDs are not detected early and addressed through appropriate interventions, they have a heavy impact on these children in the social, educational, and professional spheres, at great cost to society. The BMT-i (Batterie Modulable de Tests informatisée, or “computerized Adaptable Test Battery”) enables fast, easy, reliable assessments for each cognitive domain. It has previously been validated in children ages 4–13 who had no prior complaints. The present study demonstrates the sensitivity of the BMT-i, relative to reference test batteries, for 191 children with cognitive difficulties. Materials and Methods: These 191 subjects were included in the study by the 14 pediatricians treating them for complaints in five cognitive domains: written language [60 (cases)]; mathematical cognition (40); oral language (60); handwriting, drawing, and visuospatial construction (45); and attention and executive functioning (45). In accordance with a predefined protocol, the children were administered BMT-i tests first, by their pediatricians, and reference tests later, by specialists to whom the BMT-i test results were not disclosed. Comparison of BMT-i and reference test results made it possible to evaluate sensitivity and agreement between tests. Results: For each of the five domains, the BMT-i was very sensitive (0.91–1), and normal BMT-i results were highly predictive of normal results for specialized reference tests [negative likelihood ratio (LR–): 0–0.16]. There was close agreement between BMT-i and reference tests in all domains except attention and executive functioning, for which only moderate agreement was observed. Conclusion: The BMT-i offers rapid, reliable, simple computerized assessments whose sensitivity and agreement with reference test batteries make it a suitable first-line instrument for LD screening in children 4–13 years old. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8517505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85175052021-10-16 External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities Billard, Catherine Jung, Camille Munnich, Arnold Gassama, Sahawanatou Touzin, Monique Mirassou, Anne Willig, Thiébaut-Noël Front Pediatr Pediatrics Background: Learning disabilities (LDs) are a major public health issue, affecting cognitive functions and academic performance for 8% of children. If LDs are not detected early and addressed through appropriate interventions, they have a heavy impact on these children in the social, educational, and professional spheres, at great cost to society. The BMT-i (Batterie Modulable de Tests informatisée, or “computerized Adaptable Test Battery”) enables fast, easy, reliable assessments for each cognitive domain. It has previously been validated in children ages 4–13 who had no prior complaints. The present study demonstrates the sensitivity of the BMT-i, relative to reference test batteries, for 191 children with cognitive difficulties. Materials and Methods: These 191 subjects were included in the study by the 14 pediatricians treating them for complaints in five cognitive domains: written language [60 (cases)]; mathematical cognition (40); oral language (60); handwriting, drawing, and visuospatial construction (45); and attention and executive functioning (45). In accordance with a predefined protocol, the children were administered BMT-i tests first, by their pediatricians, and reference tests later, by specialists to whom the BMT-i test results were not disclosed. Comparison of BMT-i and reference test results made it possible to evaluate sensitivity and agreement between tests. Results: For each of the five domains, the BMT-i was very sensitive (0.91–1), and normal BMT-i results were highly predictive of normal results for specialized reference tests [negative likelihood ratio (LR–): 0–0.16]. There was close agreement between BMT-i and reference tests in all domains except attention and executive functioning, for which only moderate agreement was observed. Conclusion: The BMT-i offers rapid, reliable, simple computerized assessments whose sensitivity and agreement with reference test batteries make it a suitable first-line instrument for LD screening in children 4–13 years old. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8517505/ /pubmed/34660490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.733713 Text en Copyright © 2021 Billard, Jung, Munnich, Gassama, Touzin, Mirassou and Willig. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pediatrics Billard, Catherine Jung, Camille Munnich, Arnold Gassama, Sahawanatou Touzin, Monique Mirassou, Anne Willig, Thiébaut-Noël External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities |
title | External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities |
title_full | External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities |
title_fullStr | External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities |
title_full_unstemmed | External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities |
title_short | External Validation of BMT-i Computerized Test Battery for Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities |
title_sort | external validation of bmt-i computerized test battery for diagnosis of learning disabilities |
topic | Pediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.733713 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT billardcatherine externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities AT jungcamille externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities AT munnicharnold externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities AT gassamasahawanatou externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities AT touzinmonique externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities AT mirassouanne externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities AT willigthiebautnoel externalvalidationofbmticomputerizedtestbatteryfordiagnosisoflearningdisabilities |