Cargando…
A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa
BACKGROUND: The most common major surgical procedure performed worldwide is the caesarean section (CS). Effective pain management is a priority for women undergoing this procedure, to reduce the incidence of persistent pain (a risk factor for postpartum depression), as well as optimise maternal-neon...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636591 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5320 |
_version_ | 1784584079408103424 |
---|---|
author | Munsaka, Effraim F. van Dyk, Dominique Parker, Romy |
author_facet | Munsaka, Effraim F. van Dyk, Dominique Parker, Romy |
author_sort | Munsaka, Effraim F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The most common major surgical procedure performed worldwide is the caesarean section (CS). Effective pain management is a priority for women undergoing this procedure, to reduce the incidence of persistent pain (a risk factor for postpartum depression), as well as optimise maternal-neonatal bonding and the successful establishment of breastfeeding. Multimodal analgesia is the gold standard for post-CS analgesia. At present, no perioperative pain management protocols could be identified for the management of patients presenting for CS at regional hospitals in South Africa. This audit aimed to review the folders of patients who underwent CS, with particular reference to perioperative pain management guidelines for CS. METHODS: A descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional audit was conducted. Three hundred folders (10% of the annual number of caesarean procedures performed) from New Somerset Hospital, a regional hospital in Cape Town, South Africa were reviewed. RESULTS: The women were a mean age of 30 years (standard deviation [s.d.]: 6.2). Median gravidity was 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2–3) and parity was 1 (IQR: 1–2); 52% had previously undergone a CS. In 93.3% cases, spinal anaesthesia was employed for CS. Pain assessment was poor, with only 55 (18%) patients having their pain assessed on the day of the operation. Analgesia was prescribed in over 98% of the patients, however, medication was only administered as prescribed in 32.6%. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were prescribed in < 5% of cases. None of the patients received a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, or wound infusion catheter as supplementary strategies. CONCLUSION: Pain management for post-CS patient at this hospital is lacking. There is the need for the implementation of a structured assessment tool to improve administration of analgesics in these patients. In addition, the reasons for the omission of NSAIDs from the analgesia regimen requires investigation. Hospital requires post-CS pain protocols to guide management especially in resource-limited settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8517764 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AOSIS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85177642021-10-21 A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa Munsaka, Effraim F. van Dyk, Dominique Parker, Romy S Afr Fam Pract (2004) Original Research BACKGROUND: The most common major surgical procedure performed worldwide is the caesarean section (CS). Effective pain management is a priority for women undergoing this procedure, to reduce the incidence of persistent pain (a risk factor for postpartum depression), as well as optimise maternal-neonatal bonding and the successful establishment of breastfeeding. Multimodal analgesia is the gold standard for post-CS analgesia. At present, no perioperative pain management protocols could be identified for the management of patients presenting for CS at regional hospitals in South Africa. This audit aimed to review the folders of patients who underwent CS, with particular reference to perioperative pain management guidelines for CS. METHODS: A descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional audit was conducted. Three hundred folders (10% of the annual number of caesarean procedures performed) from New Somerset Hospital, a regional hospital in Cape Town, South Africa were reviewed. RESULTS: The women were a mean age of 30 years (standard deviation [s.d.]: 6.2). Median gravidity was 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2–3) and parity was 1 (IQR: 1–2); 52% had previously undergone a CS. In 93.3% cases, spinal anaesthesia was employed for CS. Pain assessment was poor, with only 55 (18%) patients having their pain assessed on the day of the operation. Analgesia was prescribed in over 98% of the patients, however, medication was only administered as prescribed in 32.6%. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were prescribed in < 5% of cases. None of the patients received a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, or wound infusion catheter as supplementary strategies. CONCLUSION: Pain management for post-CS patient at this hospital is lacking. There is the need for the implementation of a structured assessment tool to improve administration of analgesics in these patients. In addition, the reasons for the omission of NSAIDs from the analgesia regimen requires investigation. Hospital requires post-CS pain protocols to guide management especially in resource-limited settings. AOSIS 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8517764/ /pubmed/34636591 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5320 Text en © 2021. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Munsaka, Effraim F. van Dyk, Dominique Parker, Romy A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa |
title | A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa |
title_full | A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa |
title_fullStr | A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa |
title_short | A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa |
title_sort | retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at new somerset hospital in cape town, south africa |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636591 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5320 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munsakaeffraimf aretrospectiveauditofpainassessmentandmanagementpostcaesareansectionatnewsomersethospitalincapetownsouthafrica AT vandykdominique aretrospectiveauditofpainassessmentandmanagementpostcaesareansectionatnewsomersethospitalincapetownsouthafrica AT parkerromy aretrospectiveauditofpainassessmentandmanagementpostcaesareansectionatnewsomersethospitalincapetownsouthafrica AT munsakaeffraimf retrospectiveauditofpainassessmentandmanagementpostcaesareansectionatnewsomersethospitalincapetownsouthafrica AT vandykdominique retrospectiveauditofpainassessmentandmanagementpostcaesareansectionatnewsomersethospitalincapetownsouthafrica AT parkerromy retrospectiveauditofpainassessmentandmanagementpostcaesareansectionatnewsomersethospitalincapetownsouthafrica |