Cargando…

A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa

BACKGROUND: The most common major surgical procedure performed worldwide is the caesarean section (CS). Effective pain management is a priority for women undergoing this procedure, to reduce the incidence of persistent pain (a risk factor for postpartum depression), as well as optimise maternal-neon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munsaka, Effraim F., van Dyk, Dominique, Parker, Romy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636591
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5320
_version_ 1784584079408103424
author Munsaka, Effraim F.
van Dyk, Dominique
Parker, Romy
author_facet Munsaka, Effraim F.
van Dyk, Dominique
Parker, Romy
author_sort Munsaka, Effraim F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most common major surgical procedure performed worldwide is the caesarean section (CS). Effective pain management is a priority for women undergoing this procedure, to reduce the incidence of persistent pain (a risk factor for postpartum depression), as well as optimise maternal-neonatal bonding and the successful establishment of breastfeeding. Multimodal analgesia is the gold standard for post-CS analgesia. At present, no perioperative pain management protocols could be identified for the management of patients presenting for CS at regional hospitals in South Africa. This audit aimed to review the folders of patients who underwent CS, with particular reference to perioperative pain management guidelines for CS. METHODS: A descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional audit was conducted. Three hundred folders (10% of the annual number of caesarean procedures performed) from New Somerset Hospital, a regional hospital in Cape Town, South Africa were reviewed. RESULTS: The women were a mean age of 30 years (standard deviation [s.d.]: 6.2). Median gravidity was 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2–3) and parity was 1 (IQR: 1–2); 52% had previously undergone a CS. In 93.3% cases, spinal anaesthesia was employed for CS. Pain assessment was poor, with only 55 (18%) patients having their pain assessed on the day of the operation. Analgesia was prescribed in over 98% of the patients, however, medication was only administered as prescribed in 32.6%. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were prescribed in < 5% of cases. None of the patients received a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, or wound infusion catheter as supplementary strategies. CONCLUSION: Pain management for post-CS patient at this hospital is lacking. There is the need for the implementation of a structured assessment tool to improve administration of analgesics in these patients. In addition, the reasons for the omission of NSAIDs from the analgesia regimen requires investigation. Hospital requires post-CS pain protocols to guide management especially in resource-limited settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8517764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85177642021-10-21 A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa Munsaka, Effraim F. van Dyk, Dominique Parker, Romy S Afr Fam Pract (2004) Original Research BACKGROUND: The most common major surgical procedure performed worldwide is the caesarean section (CS). Effective pain management is a priority for women undergoing this procedure, to reduce the incidence of persistent pain (a risk factor for postpartum depression), as well as optimise maternal-neonatal bonding and the successful establishment of breastfeeding. Multimodal analgesia is the gold standard for post-CS analgesia. At present, no perioperative pain management protocols could be identified for the management of patients presenting for CS at regional hospitals in South Africa. This audit aimed to review the folders of patients who underwent CS, with particular reference to perioperative pain management guidelines for CS. METHODS: A descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional audit was conducted. Three hundred folders (10% of the annual number of caesarean procedures performed) from New Somerset Hospital, a regional hospital in Cape Town, South Africa were reviewed. RESULTS: The women were a mean age of 30 years (standard deviation [s.d.]: 6.2). Median gravidity was 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2–3) and parity was 1 (IQR: 1–2); 52% had previously undergone a CS. In 93.3% cases, spinal anaesthesia was employed for CS. Pain assessment was poor, with only 55 (18%) patients having their pain assessed on the day of the operation. Analgesia was prescribed in over 98% of the patients, however, medication was only administered as prescribed in 32.6%. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were prescribed in < 5% of cases. None of the patients received a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, or wound infusion catheter as supplementary strategies. CONCLUSION: Pain management for post-CS patient at this hospital is lacking. There is the need for the implementation of a structured assessment tool to improve administration of analgesics in these patients. In addition, the reasons for the omission of NSAIDs from the analgesia regimen requires investigation. Hospital requires post-CS pain protocols to guide management especially in resource-limited settings. AOSIS 2021-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8517764/ /pubmed/34636591 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5320 Text en © 2021. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Munsaka, Effraim F.
van Dyk, Dominique
Parker, Romy
A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa
title A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa
title_full A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa
title_fullStr A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa
title_short A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa
title_sort retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post-caesarean section at new somerset hospital in cape town, south africa
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636591
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5320
work_keys_str_mv AT munsakaeffraimf aretrospectiveauditofpainassessmentandmanagementpostcaesareansectionatnewsomersethospitalincapetownsouthafrica
AT vandykdominique aretrospectiveauditofpainassessmentandmanagementpostcaesareansectionatnewsomersethospitalincapetownsouthafrica
AT parkerromy aretrospectiveauditofpainassessmentandmanagementpostcaesareansectionatnewsomersethospitalincapetownsouthafrica
AT munsakaeffraimf retrospectiveauditofpainassessmentandmanagementpostcaesareansectionatnewsomersethospitalincapetownsouthafrica
AT vandykdominique retrospectiveauditofpainassessmentandmanagementpostcaesareansectionatnewsomersethospitalincapetownsouthafrica
AT parkerromy retrospectiveauditofpainassessmentandmanagementpostcaesareansectionatnewsomersethospitalincapetownsouthafrica