Cargando…

Monolithic metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide separation

Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) is both a primary contributor to global warming and a major industrial impurity. Traditional approaches to carbon capture involve corrosive and energy-intensive processes such as liquid amine absorption. Although adsorptive separation has long been a promising alternative to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madden, David G., Babu, Robin, Çamur, Ceren, Rampal, Nakul, Silvestre-Albero, Joaquin, Curtin, Teresa, Fairen-Jimenez, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1fd00017a
_version_ 1784584120300470272
author Madden, David G.
Babu, Robin
Çamur, Ceren
Rampal, Nakul
Silvestre-Albero, Joaquin
Curtin, Teresa
Fairen-Jimenez, David
author_facet Madden, David G.
Babu, Robin
Çamur, Ceren
Rampal, Nakul
Silvestre-Albero, Joaquin
Curtin, Teresa
Fairen-Jimenez, David
author_sort Madden, David G.
collection PubMed
description Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) is both a primary contributor to global warming and a major industrial impurity. Traditional approaches to carbon capture involve corrosive and energy-intensive processes such as liquid amine absorption. Although adsorptive separation has long been a promising alternative to traditional processes, up to this point there has been a lack of appropriate adsorbents capable of capturing CO(2) whilst maintaining low regeneration energies. In the context of CO(2) capture, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have gained much attention in the past two decades as potential materials. Their tuneable nature allows for precise control over the pore size and chemistry, which allows for the tailoring of their properties for the selective adsorption of CO(2). While many candidate materials exist, the amount of research into material shaping for use in industrial processes has been limited. Traditional shaping strategies such as pelletisation involve the use of binders and/or mechanical processes, which can have a detrimental impact on the adsorption properties of the resulting materials or can result in low-density structures with low volumetric adsorption capacities. Herein, we demonstrate the use of a series of monolithic MOFs ((mono)UiO-66, (mono)UiO-66-NH(2) & (mono)HKUST-1) for use in gas separation processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8517963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85179632021-11-04 Monolithic metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide separation Madden, David G. Babu, Robin Çamur, Ceren Rampal, Nakul Silvestre-Albero, Joaquin Curtin, Teresa Fairen-Jimenez, David Faraday Discuss Chemistry Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) is both a primary contributor to global warming and a major industrial impurity. Traditional approaches to carbon capture involve corrosive and energy-intensive processes such as liquid amine absorption. Although adsorptive separation has long been a promising alternative to traditional processes, up to this point there has been a lack of appropriate adsorbents capable of capturing CO(2) whilst maintaining low regeneration energies. In the context of CO(2) capture, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have gained much attention in the past two decades as potential materials. Their tuneable nature allows for precise control over the pore size and chemistry, which allows for the tailoring of their properties for the selective adsorption of CO(2). While many candidate materials exist, the amount of research into material shaping for use in industrial processes has been limited. Traditional shaping strategies such as pelletisation involve the use of binders and/or mechanical processes, which can have a detrimental impact on the adsorption properties of the resulting materials or can result in low-density structures with low volumetric adsorption capacities. Herein, we demonstrate the use of a series of monolithic MOFs ((mono)UiO-66, (mono)UiO-66-NH(2) & (mono)HKUST-1) for use in gas separation processes. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8517963/ /pubmed/34235530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1fd00017a Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Madden, David G.
Babu, Robin
Çamur, Ceren
Rampal, Nakul
Silvestre-Albero, Joaquin
Curtin, Teresa
Fairen-Jimenez, David
Monolithic metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide separation
title Monolithic metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide separation
title_full Monolithic metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide separation
title_fullStr Monolithic metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide separation
title_full_unstemmed Monolithic metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide separation
title_short Monolithic metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide separation
title_sort monolithic metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide separation
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1fd00017a
work_keys_str_mv AT maddendavidg monolithicmetalorganicframeworksforcarbondioxideseparation
AT baburobin monolithicmetalorganicframeworksforcarbondioxideseparation
AT camurceren monolithicmetalorganicframeworksforcarbondioxideseparation
AT rampalnakul monolithicmetalorganicframeworksforcarbondioxideseparation
AT silvestrealberojoaquin monolithicmetalorganicframeworksforcarbondioxideseparation
AT curtinteresa monolithicmetalorganicframeworksforcarbondioxideseparation
AT fairenjimenezdavid monolithicmetalorganicframeworksforcarbondioxideseparation