Cargando…

Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To study the performance of a proposed deep learning-based autocontouring system in delineating organs at risk (OARs) in breast radiotherapy with a group of experts. METHODS: Eleven experts from two institutions delineated nine OARs in 10 cases of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conservi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byun, Hwa Kyung, Chang, Jee Suk, Choi, Min Seo, Chun, Jaehee, Jung, Jinhong, Jeong, Chiyoung, Kim, Jin Sung, Chang, Yongjin, Chung, Seung Yeun, Lee, Seungryul, Kim, Yong Bae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34649569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01923-1
_version_ 1784584184503730176
author Byun, Hwa Kyung
Chang, Jee Suk
Choi, Min Seo
Chun, Jaehee
Jung, Jinhong
Jeong, Chiyoung
Kim, Jin Sung
Chang, Yongjin
Chung, Seung Yeun
Lee, Seungryul
Kim, Yong Bae
author_facet Byun, Hwa Kyung
Chang, Jee Suk
Choi, Min Seo
Chun, Jaehee
Jung, Jinhong
Jeong, Chiyoung
Kim, Jin Sung
Chang, Yongjin
Chung, Seung Yeun
Lee, Seungryul
Kim, Yong Bae
author_sort Byun, Hwa Kyung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To study the performance of a proposed deep learning-based autocontouring system in delineating organs at risk (OARs) in breast radiotherapy with a group of experts. METHODS: Eleven experts from two institutions delineated nine OARs in 10 cases of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. Autocontours were then provided to the experts for correction. Overall, 110 manual contours, 110 corrected autocontours, and 10 autocontours of each type of OAR were analyzed. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to compare the degree of agreement between the best manual contour (chosen by an independent expert committee) and each autocontour, corrected autocontour, and manual contour. Higher DSCs and lower HDs indicated a better geometric overlap. The amount of time reduction using the autocontouring system was examined. User satisfaction was evaluated using a survey. RESULTS: Manual contours, corrected autocontours, and autocontours had a similar accuracy in the average DSC value (0.88 vs. 0.90 vs. 0.90). The accuracy of autocontours ranked the second place, based on DSCs, and the first place, based on HDs among the manual contours. Interphysician variations among the experts were reduced in corrected autocontours, compared to variations in manual contours (DSC: 0.89–0.90 vs. 0.87–0.90; HD: 4.3–5.8 mm vs. 5.3–7.6 mm). Among the manual delineations, the breast contours had the largest variations, which improved most significantly with the autocontouring system. The total mean times for nine OARs were 37 min for manual contours and 6 min for corrected autocontours. The results of the survey revealed good user satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The autocontouring system had a similar performance in OARs as that of the experts’ manual contouring. This system can be valuable in improving the quality of breast radiotherapy and reducing interphysician variability in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01923-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8518257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85182572021-10-20 Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy Byun, Hwa Kyung Chang, Jee Suk Choi, Min Seo Chun, Jaehee Jung, Jinhong Jeong, Chiyoung Kim, Jin Sung Chang, Yongjin Chung, Seung Yeun Lee, Seungryul Kim, Yong Bae Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: To study the performance of a proposed deep learning-based autocontouring system in delineating organs at risk (OARs) in breast radiotherapy with a group of experts. METHODS: Eleven experts from two institutions delineated nine OARs in 10 cases of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. Autocontours were then provided to the experts for correction. Overall, 110 manual contours, 110 corrected autocontours, and 10 autocontours of each type of OAR were analyzed. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to compare the degree of agreement between the best manual contour (chosen by an independent expert committee) and each autocontour, corrected autocontour, and manual contour. Higher DSCs and lower HDs indicated a better geometric overlap. The amount of time reduction using the autocontouring system was examined. User satisfaction was evaluated using a survey. RESULTS: Manual contours, corrected autocontours, and autocontours had a similar accuracy in the average DSC value (0.88 vs. 0.90 vs. 0.90). The accuracy of autocontours ranked the second place, based on DSCs, and the first place, based on HDs among the manual contours. Interphysician variations among the experts were reduced in corrected autocontours, compared to variations in manual contours (DSC: 0.89–0.90 vs. 0.87–0.90; HD: 4.3–5.8 mm vs. 5.3–7.6 mm). Among the manual delineations, the breast contours had the largest variations, which improved most significantly with the autocontouring system. The total mean times for nine OARs were 37 min for manual contours and 6 min for corrected autocontours. The results of the survey revealed good user satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The autocontouring system had a similar performance in OARs as that of the experts’ manual contouring. This system can be valuable in improving the quality of breast radiotherapy and reducing interphysician variability in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01923-1. BioMed Central 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8518257/ /pubmed/34649569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01923-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Byun, Hwa Kyung
Chang, Jee Suk
Choi, Min Seo
Chun, Jaehee
Jung, Jinhong
Jeong, Chiyoung
Kim, Jin Sung
Chang, Yongjin
Chung, Seung Yeun
Lee, Seungryul
Kim, Yong Bae
Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy
title Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy
title_full Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy
title_short Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy
title_sort evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34649569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01923-1
work_keys_str_mv AT byunhwakyung evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT changjeesuk evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT choiminseo evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT chunjaehee evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT jungjinhong evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT jeongchiyoung evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT kimjinsung evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT changyongjin evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT chungseungyeun evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT leeseungryul evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy
AT kimyongbae evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy