Cargando…
Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy
PURPOSE: To study the performance of a proposed deep learning-based autocontouring system in delineating organs at risk (OARs) in breast radiotherapy with a group of experts. METHODS: Eleven experts from two institutions delineated nine OARs in 10 cases of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conservi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34649569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01923-1 |
_version_ | 1784584184503730176 |
---|---|
author | Byun, Hwa Kyung Chang, Jee Suk Choi, Min Seo Chun, Jaehee Jung, Jinhong Jeong, Chiyoung Kim, Jin Sung Chang, Yongjin Chung, Seung Yeun Lee, Seungryul Kim, Yong Bae |
author_facet | Byun, Hwa Kyung Chang, Jee Suk Choi, Min Seo Chun, Jaehee Jung, Jinhong Jeong, Chiyoung Kim, Jin Sung Chang, Yongjin Chung, Seung Yeun Lee, Seungryul Kim, Yong Bae |
author_sort | Byun, Hwa Kyung |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To study the performance of a proposed deep learning-based autocontouring system in delineating organs at risk (OARs) in breast radiotherapy with a group of experts. METHODS: Eleven experts from two institutions delineated nine OARs in 10 cases of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. Autocontours were then provided to the experts for correction. Overall, 110 manual contours, 110 corrected autocontours, and 10 autocontours of each type of OAR were analyzed. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to compare the degree of agreement between the best manual contour (chosen by an independent expert committee) and each autocontour, corrected autocontour, and manual contour. Higher DSCs and lower HDs indicated a better geometric overlap. The amount of time reduction using the autocontouring system was examined. User satisfaction was evaluated using a survey. RESULTS: Manual contours, corrected autocontours, and autocontours had a similar accuracy in the average DSC value (0.88 vs. 0.90 vs. 0.90). The accuracy of autocontours ranked the second place, based on DSCs, and the first place, based on HDs among the manual contours. Interphysician variations among the experts were reduced in corrected autocontours, compared to variations in manual contours (DSC: 0.89–0.90 vs. 0.87–0.90; HD: 4.3–5.8 mm vs. 5.3–7.6 mm). Among the manual delineations, the breast contours had the largest variations, which improved most significantly with the autocontouring system. The total mean times for nine OARs were 37 min for manual contours and 6 min for corrected autocontours. The results of the survey revealed good user satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The autocontouring system had a similar performance in OARs as that of the experts’ manual contouring. This system can be valuable in improving the quality of breast radiotherapy and reducing interphysician variability in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01923-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8518257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85182572021-10-20 Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy Byun, Hwa Kyung Chang, Jee Suk Choi, Min Seo Chun, Jaehee Jung, Jinhong Jeong, Chiyoung Kim, Jin Sung Chang, Yongjin Chung, Seung Yeun Lee, Seungryul Kim, Yong Bae Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: To study the performance of a proposed deep learning-based autocontouring system in delineating organs at risk (OARs) in breast radiotherapy with a group of experts. METHODS: Eleven experts from two institutions delineated nine OARs in 10 cases of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. Autocontours were then provided to the experts for correction. Overall, 110 manual contours, 110 corrected autocontours, and 10 autocontours of each type of OAR were analyzed. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to compare the degree of agreement between the best manual contour (chosen by an independent expert committee) and each autocontour, corrected autocontour, and manual contour. Higher DSCs and lower HDs indicated a better geometric overlap. The amount of time reduction using the autocontouring system was examined. User satisfaction was evaluated using a survey. RESULTS: Manual contours, corrected autocontours, and autocontours had a similar accuracy in the average DSC value (0.88 vs. 0.90 vs. 0.90). The accuracy of autocontours ranked the second place, based on DSCs, and the first place, based on HDs among the manual contours. Interphysician variations among the experts were reduced in corrected autocontours, compared to variations in manual contours (DSC: 0.89–0.90 vs. 0.87–0.90; HD: 4.3–5.8 mm vs. 5.3–7.6 mm). Among the manual delineations, the breast contours had the largest variations, which improved most significantly with the autocontouring system. The total mean times for nine OARs were 37 min for manual contours and 6 min for corrected autocontours. The results of the survey revealed good user satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The autocontouring system had a similar performance in OARs as that of the experts’ manual contouring. This system can be valuable in improving the quality of breast radiotherapy and reducing interphysician variability in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01923-1. BioMed Central 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8518257/ /pubmed/34649569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01923-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Byun, Hwa Kyung Chang, Jee Suk Choi, Min Seo Chun, Jaehee Jung, Jinhong Jeong, Chiyoung Kim, Jin Sung Chang, Yongjin Chung, Seung Yeun Lee, Seungryul Kim, Yong Bae Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy |
title | Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_full | Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_short | Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy |
title_sort | evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34649569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01923-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT byunhwakyung evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy AT changjeesuk evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy AT choiminseo evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy AT chunjaehee evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy AT jungjinhong evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy AT jeongchiyoung evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy AT kimjinsung evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy AT changyongjin evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy AT chungseungyeun evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy AT leeseungryul evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy AT kimyongbae evaluationofdeeplearningbasedautosegmentationinbreastcancerradiotherapy |