Cargando…

Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study

BACKGROUND: Childbirth could negatively affect the woman’s health through adverse events. To prevent adverse events and increase patient safety it is important to detect and learn from them. The aim of the study was to describe adverse events, including the preventability and severity of harm during...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skoogh, Annika, Hall-Lord, Marie Louise, Bååth, Carina, Bojö, Ann-Kristin Sandin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34649538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07109-5
_version_ 1784584184756436992
author Skoogh, Annika
Hall-Lord, Marie Louise
Bååth, Carina
Bojö, Ann-Kristin Sandin
author_facet Skoogh, Annika
Hall-Lord, Marie Louise
Bååth, Carina
Bojö, Ann-Kristin Sandin
author_sort Skoogh, Annika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Childbirth could negatively affect the woman’s health through adverse events. To prevent adverse events and increase patient safety it is important to detect and learn from them. The aim of the study was to describe adverse events, including the preventability and severity of harm during planned vaginal births, in women giving birth in the labor ward. METHODS: The study had a descriptive design with a retrospective birth record review to assess the preventability of adverse events using the Swedish version of the Global Trigger Tool. The setting was a labor ward in Sweden with low-risk and risk childbirths. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s Chi-square test and Student’s t-test were used. RESULTS: A total of 38 adverse events (12.2%) were identified in 311 reviewed birth records. Of these, 28 (73.7%) were assessed as preventable. Third- or fourth-degree lacerations and distended urinary bladder were most prevalent together with anesthesia-related adverse events. The majority of the adverse events were classified into the harm categories of ‘prolonged hospital care’ (63.2%) and ‘temporary harm’ (31.6%). No permanent harm were identified, but over two-thirds of the adverse events were assessed as preventable. CONCLUSIONS: This first study using Global Trigger Tool in a labor ward in Sweden identified a higher incidence of adverse events than previous studies in obstetric care. No permanent patient harm was found, but over two-thirds of the adverse events were assessed as preventable. The results draw particular attention to 3(rd)-or 4(th)-degree lacerations, distended urinary bladder and anesthesia-related adverse events. The feedback on identified adverse events should be used for systematic quality improvement and clinical recommendations how to prevent adverse events must be implemented. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07109-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8518258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85182582021-10-20 Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study Skoogh, Annika Hall-Lord, Marie Louise Bååth, Carina Bojö, Ann-Kristin Sandin BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Childbirth could negatively affect the woman’s health through adverse events. To prevent adverse events and increase patient safety it is important to detect and learn from them. The aim of the study was to describe adverse events, including the preventability and severity of harm during planned vaginal births, in women giving birth in the labor ward. METHODS: The study had a descriptive design with a retrospective birth record review to assess the preventability of adverse events using the Swedish version of the Global Trigger Tool. The setting was a labor ward in Sweden with low-risk and risk childbirths. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s Chi-square test and Student’s t-test were used. RESULTS: A total of 38 adverse events (12.2%) were identified in 311 reviewed birth records. Of these, 28 (73.7%) were assessed as preventable. Third- or fourth-degree lacerations and distended urinary bladder were most prevalent together with anesthesia-related adverse events. The majority of the adverse events were classified into the harm categories of ‘prolonged hospital care’ (63.2%) and ‘temporary harm’ (31.6%). No permanent harm were identified, but over two-thirds of the adverse events were assessed as preventable. CONCLUSIONS: This first study using Global Trigger Tool in a labor ward in Sweden identified a higher incidence of adverse events than previous studies in obstetric care. No permanent patient harm was found, but over two-thirds of the adverse events were assessed as preventable. The results draw particular attention to 3(rd)-or 4(th)-degree lacerations, distended urinary bladder and anesthesia-related adverse events. The feedback on identified adverse events should be used for systematic quality improvement and clinical recommendations how to prevent adverse events must be implemented. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07109-5. BioMed Central 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8518258/ /pubmed/34649538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07109-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Skoogh, Annika
Hall-Lord, Marie Louise
Bååth, Carina
Bojö, Ann-Kristin Sandin
Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study
title Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study
title_full Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study
title_fullStr Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study
title_full_unstemmed Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study
title_short Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study
title_sort adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34649538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07109-5
work_keys_str_mv AT skooghannika adverseeventsinwomengivingbirthinalaborwardaretrospectiverecordreviewstudy
AT halllordmarielouise adverseeventsinwomengivingbirthinalaborwardaretrospectiverecordreviewstudy
AT baathcarina adverseeventsinwomengivingbirthinalaborwardaretrospectiverecordreviewstudy
AT bojoannkristinsandin adverseeventsinwomengivingbirthinalaborwardaretrospectiverecordreviewstudy