Cargando…

Emotional distress in the early stages of the COVID-19 related lockdowns depending on the severity of the pandemic and emergency measures: a comparative online-survey in Germany, Austria and Italy

BACKGROUND: The first wave of the COVID-19-pandemic hit different countries with varying degrees of severity, so that differences in the type and level of emergency measures were also necessary. It can be assumed that the psychological burden was higher in countries subjected to a more severe course...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eichenberg, Christiane, Grossfurthner, Martin, Kietaibl, Sibylle, Riboli, Greta, Borlimi, Rosita, Holocher-Benetka, Stefana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34654389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03505-7
_version_ 1784584186280017920
author Eichenberg, Christiane
Grossfurthner, Martin
Kietaibl, Sibylle
Riboli, Greta
Borlimi, Rosita
Holocher-Benetka, Stefana
author_facet Eichenberg, Christiane
Grossfurthner, Martin
Kietaibl, Sibylle
Riboli, Greta
Borlimi, Rosita
Holocher-Benetka, Stefana
author_sort Eichenberg, Christiane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The first wave of the COVID-19-pandemic hit different countries with varying degrees of severity, so that differences in the type and level of emergency measures were also necessary. It can be assumed that the psychological burden was higher in countries subjected to a more severe course of the pandemic (Italy) than in countries subjected to a less severe one (Germany, Austria). OBJECTIVE: To investigate and contrast the wellbeing of the population in Italy, Austria, and Germany in the early phase of the first lockdown. METHOD: Online survey on N = 4289 individuals. The questionnaire comprised a self-administered section, exploring the dimensions: perceived severity of COVID-19, perceived risk of disease, concerns related to COVID-19, emergency measure acceptance and emotional distress due to emergency measures; and standardized scales to record emotional state and coping: Stress-Coping-Style Questionnaire, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory. RESULTS: The three countries displayed significant differences in all investigated dimensions (p < .001). Italian participants assessed the COVID-19 virus as much more dangerous (p < .001), but despite the prevalence of the virus, the subjective risk of disease was perceived to be lower in Italy (p < .001). This could be a positive effect of the restrictive curfews set by the government in Italy. The emergency measures were generally perceived to be very effective in all three countries, but due to the duration and the severity of the measures, the fear and stress-reaction were the strongest among Italian participants (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The stricter measures in Italy prevented an application of many positive stress processing strategies, which, in turn, fostered the perpetuation of stresses and fear. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-021-03505-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8518266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85182662021-10-15 Emotional distress in the early stages of the COVID-19 related lockdowns depending on the severity of the pandemic and emergency measures: a comparative online-survey in Germany, Austria and Italy Eichenberg, Christiane Grossfurthner, Martin Kietaibl, Sibylle Riboli, Greta Borlimi, Rosita Holocher-Benetka, Stefana BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: The first wave of the COVID-19-pandemic hit different countries with varying degrees of severity, so that differences in the type and level of emergency measures were also necessary. It can be assumed that the psychological burden was higher in countries subjected to a more severe course of the pandemic (Italy) than in countries subjected to a less severe one (Germany, Austria). OBJECTIVE: To investigate and contrast the wellbeing of the population in Italy, Austria, and Germany in the early phase of the first lockdown. METHOD: Online survey on N = 4289 individuals. The questionnaire comprised a self-administered section, exploring the dimensions: perceived severity of COVID-19, perceived risk of disease, concerns related to COVID-19, emergency measure acceptance and emotional distress due to emergency measures; and standardized scales to record emotional state and coping: Stress-Coping-Style Questionnaire, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory. RESULTS: The three countries displayed significant differences in all investigated dimensions (p < .001). Italian participants assessed the COVID-19 virus as much more dangerous (p < .001), but despite the prevalence of the virus, the subjective risk of disease was perceived to be lower in Italy (p < .001). This could be a positive effect of the restrictive curfews set by the government in Italy. The emergency measures were generally perceived to be very effective in all three countries, but due to the duration and the severity of the measures, the fear and stress-reaction were the strongest among Italian participants (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The stricter measures in Italy prevented an application of many positive stress processing strategies, which, in turn, fostered the perpetuation of stresses and fear. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-021-03505-7. BioMed Central 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8518266/ /pubmed/34654389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03505-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Eichenberg, Christiane
Grossfurthner, Martin
Kietaibl, Sibylle
Riboli, Greta
Borlimi, Rosita
Holocher-Benetka, Stefana
Emotional distress in the early stages of the COVID-19 related lockdowns depending on the severity of the pandemic and emergency measures: a comparative online-survey in Germany, Austria and Italy
title Emotional distress in the early stages of the COVID-19 related lockdowns depending on the severity of the pandemic and emergency measures: a comparative online-survey in Germany, Austria and Italy
title_full Emotional distress in the early stages of the COVID-19 related lockdowns depending on the severity of the pandemic and emergency measures: a comparative online-survey in Germany, Austria and Italy
title_fullStr Emotional distress in the early stages of the COVID-19 related lockdowns depending on the severity of the pandemic and emergency measures: a comparative online-survey in Germany, Austria and Italy
title_full_unstemmed Emotional distress in the early stages of the COVID-19 related lockdowns depending on the severity of the pandemic and emergency measures: a comparative online-survey in Germany, Austria and Italy
title_short Emotional distress in the early stages of the COVID-19 related lockdowns depending on the severity of the pandemic and emergency measures: a comparative online-survey in Germany, Austria and Italy
title_sort emotional distress in the early stages of the covid-19 related lockdowns depending on the severity of the pandemic and emergency measures: a comparative online-survey in germany, austria and italy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34654389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03505-7
work_keys_str_mv AT eichenbergchristiane emotionaldistressintheearlystagesofthecovid19relatedlockdownsdependingontheseverityofthepandemicandemergencymeasuresacomparativeonlinesurveyingermanyaustriaanditaly
AT grossfurthnermartin emotionaldistressintheearlystagesofthecovid19relatedlockdownsdependingontheseverityofthepandemicandemergencymeasuresacomparativeonlinesurveyingermanyaustriaanditaly
AT kietaiblsibylle emotionaldistressintheearlystagesofthecovid19relatedlockdownsdependingontheseverityofthepandemicandemergencymeasuresacomparativeonlinesurveyingermanyaustriaanditaly
AT riboligreta emotionaldistressintheearlystagesofthecovid19relatedlockdownsdependingontheseverityofthepandemicandemergencymeasuresacomparativeonlinesurveyingermanyaustriaanditaly
AT borlimirosita emotionaldistressintheearlystagesofthecovid19relatedlockdownsdependingontheseverityofthepandemicandemergencymeasuresacomparativeonlinesurveyingermanyaustriaanditaly
AT holocherbenetkastefana emotionaldistressintheearlystagesofthecovid19relatedlockdownsdependingontheseverityofthepandemicandemergencymeasuresacomparativeonlinesurveyingermanyaustriaanditaly