Cargando…

Artificial intelligence assists identifying malignant versus benign liver lesions using contrast‐enhanced ultrasound

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study aims to construct a strategy that uses assistance from artificial intelligence (AI) to assist radiologists in the identification of malignant versus benign focal liver lesions (FLLs) using contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS: A training set (patients = 363) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Hang‐Tong, Wang, Wei, Chen, Li‐Da, Ruan, Si‐Min, Chen, Shu‐Ling, Li, Xin, Lu, Ming‐De, Xie, Xiao‐Yan, Kuang, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33880797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15522
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study aims to construct a strategy that uses assistance from artificial intelligence (AI) to assist radiologists in the identification of malignant versus benign focal liver lesions (FLLs) using contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS: A training set (patients = 363) and a testing set (patients = 211) were collected from our institute. On four‐phase CEUS images in the training set, a composite deep learning architecture was trained and tuned for differentiating malignant and benign FLLs. In the test dataset, AI performance was evaluated by comparison with radiologists with varied levels of experience. Based on the comparison, an AI assistance strategy was constructed, and its usefulness in reducing CEUS interobserver heterogeneity was further tested. RESULTS: In the test set, to identify malignant versus benign FLLs, AI achieved an area under the curve of 0.934 (95% CI 0.890–0.978) with an accuracy of 91.0%. Comparing with radiologists reviewing videos along with complementary patient information, AI outperformed residents (82.9–84.4%, P = 0.038) and matched the performance of experts (87.2–88.2%, P = 0.438). Due to the higher positive predictive value (PPV) (AI: 95.6% vs residents: 88.6–89.7%, P = 0.056), an AI strategy was defined to improve the malignant diagnosis. With the assistance of AI, radiologists exhibited a sensitivity improvement of 97.0–99.4% (P < 0.05) and an accuracy of 91.0–92.9% (P = 0.008–0.189), which was comparable with that of the experts (P = 0.904). CONCLUSIONS: The CEUS‐based AI strategy improved the performance of residents and reduced CEUS's interobserver heterogeneity in the differentiation of benign and malignant FLLs.