Cargando…

Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporal trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) utilisation and outcomes in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 289 patients from seven hospitals who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for locally...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamaya, Tomoko, Hatakeyama, Shingo, Tanaka, Toshikazu, Kubota, Yuka, Togashi, Kyo, Hosogoe, Shogo, Fujita, Naoki, Kusaka, Ayumu, Tokui, Noriko, Okamoto, Teppei, Yamamoto, Hayato, Yoneyama, Tohru, Yoneyama, Takahiro, Hashimoto, Yasuhiro, Ohyama, Chikara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33484231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15346
_version_ 1784584244090109952
author Hamaya, Tomoko
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Tanaka, Toshikazu
Kubota, Yuka
Togashi, Kyo
Hosogoe, Shogo
Fujita, Naoki
Kusaka, Ayumu
Tokui, Noriko
Okamoto, Teppei
Yamamoto, Hayato
Yoneyama, Tohru
Yoneyama, Takahiro
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
Ohyama, Chikara
author_facet Hamaya, Tomoko
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Tanaka, Toshikazu
Kubota, Yuka
Togashi, Kyo
Hosogoe, Shogo
Fujita, Naoki
Kusaka, Ayumu
Tokui, Noriko
Okamoto, Teppei
Yamamoto, Hayato
Yoneyama, Tohru
Yoneyama, Takahiro
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
Ohyama, Chikara
author_sort Hamaya, Tomoko
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporal trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) utilisation and outcomes in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 289 patients from seven hospitals who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for locally advanced UTUC (≥cT3 or cN+) between 2000 and 2020. These patients received RNU alone or two to four courses of NAC with either a cisplatin‐ or carboplatin‐based regimen. We evaluated the temporal changes in NAC use and compared the visceral recurrence‐free, cancer‐specific, and overall survival rates. The effect of NAC on oncological outcomes was examined using multivariate Cox regression analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) models. RESULTS: Of 289 patients, 144 underwent NAC followed by RNU (NAC group) and 145 underwent RNU alone (Control [Ctrl] group). NAC use increased significantly from 19% (2006–2010), 58% (2011–2015), to 79% (2016–2020). Pathological downstaging was significantly higher in the NAC group than in the Ctrl group. The IPTW‐adjusted multivariable analyses showed that NAC significantly improved the oncological outcomes in the NAC group compared with the Ctrl group. Moreover, carboplatin‐based NAC significantly improved the oncological outcomes in the NAC group compared with the Ctrl group among patients with chronic kidney disease Stage ≥3. There were no significant differences in oncological outcomes between the cisplatin‐ and carboplatin‐based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NAC for high‐risk UTUC increased significantly after 2010. Platinum‐based short‐term NAC followed by immediate RNU may not impede and potentially improves oncological outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8518523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85185232021-10-21 Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study Hamaya, Tomoko Hatakeyama, Shingo Tanaka, Toshikazu Kubota, Yuka Togashi, Kyo Hosogoe, Shogo Fujita, Naoki Kusaka, Ayumu Tokui, Noriko Okamoto, Teppei Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Tohru Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara BJU Int Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporal trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) utilisation and outcomes in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 289 patients from seven hospitals who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for locally advanced UTUC (≥cT3 or cN+) between 2000 and 2020. These patients received RNU alone or two to four courses of NAC with either a cisplatin‐ or carboplatin‐based regimen. We evaluated the temporal changes in NAC use and compared the visceral recurrence‐free, cancer‐specific, and overall survival rates. The effect of NAC on oncological outcomes was examined using multivariate Cox regression analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) models. RESULTS: Of 289 patients, 144 underwent NAC followed by RNU (NAC group) and 145 underwent RNU alone (Control [Ctrl] group). NAC use increased significantly from 19% (2006–2010), 58% (2011–2015), to 79% (2016–2020). Pathological downstaging was significantly higher in the NAC group than in the Ctrl group. The IPTW‐adjusted multivariable analyses showed that NAC significantly improved the oncological outcomes in the NAC group compared with the Ctrl group. Moreover, carboplatin‐based NAC significantly improved the oncological outcomes in the NAC group compared with the Ctrl group among patients with chronic kidney disease Stage ≥3. There were no significant differences in oncological outcomes between the cisplatin‐ and carboplatin‐based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NAC for high‐risk UTUC increased significantly after 2010. Platinum‐based short‐term NAC followed by immediate RNU may not impede and potentially improves oncological outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-15 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8518523/ /pubmed/33484231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15346 Text en © 2021 The Authors BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hamaya, Tomoko
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Tanaka, Toshikazu
Kubota, Yuka
Togashi, Kyo
Hosogoe, Shogo
Fujita, Naoki
Kusaka, Ayumu
Tokui, Noriko
Okamoto, Teppei
Yamamoto, Hayato
Yoneyama, Tohru
Yoneyama, Takahiro
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
Ohyama, Chikara
Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study
title Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study
title_full Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study
title_fullStr Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study
title_short Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study
title_sort trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33484231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15346
work_keys_str_mv AT hamayatomoko trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT hatakeyamashingo trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT tanakatoshikazu trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT kubotayuka trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT togashikyo trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT hosogoeshogo trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT fujitanaoki trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT kusakaayumu trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT tokuinoriko trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT okamototeppei trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT yamamotohayato trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT yoneyamatohru trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT yoneyamatakahiro trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT hashimotoyasuhiro trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT ohyamachikara trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy