Cargando…
Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporal trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) utilisation and outcomes in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 289 patients from seven hospitals who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for locally...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33484231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15346 |
_version_ | 1784584244090109952 |
---|---|
author | Hamaya, Tomoko Hatakeyama, Shingo Tanaka, Toshikazu Kubota, Yuka Togashi, Kyo Hosogoe, Shogo Fujita, Naoki Kusaka, Ayumu Tokui, Noriko Okamoto, Teppei Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Tohru Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara |
author_facet | Hamaya, Tomoko Hatakeyama, Shingo Tanaka, Toshikazu Kubota, Yuka Togashi, Kyo Hosogoe, Shogo Fujita, Naoki Kusaka, Ayumu Tokui, Noriko Okamoto, Teppei Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Tohru Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara |
author_sort | Hamaya, Tomoko |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporal trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) utilisation and outcomes in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 289 patients from seven hospitals who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for locally advanced UTUC (≥cT3 or cN+) between 2000 and 2020. These patients received RNU alone or two to four courses of NAC with either a cisplatin‐ or carboplatin‐based regimen. We evaluated the temporal changes in NAC use and compared the visceral recurrence‐free, cancer‐specific, and overall survival rates. The effect of NAC on oncological outcomes was examined using multivariate Cox regression analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) models. RESULTS: Of 289 patients, 144 underwent NAC followed by RNU (NAC group) and 145 underwent RNU alone (Control [Ctrl] group). NAC use increased significantly from 19% (2006–2010), 58% (2011–2015), to 79% (2016–2020). Pathological downstaging was significantly higher in the NAC group than in the Ctrl group. The IPTW‐adjusted multivariable analyses showed that NAC significantly improved the oncological outcomes in the NAC group compared with the Ctrl group. Moreover, carboplatin‐based NAC significantly improved the oncological outcomes in the NAC group compared with the Ctrl group among patients with chronic kidney disease Stage ≥3. There were no significant differences in oncological outcomes between the cisplatin‐ and carboplatin‐based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NAC for high‐risk UTUC increased significantly after 2010. Platinum‐based short‐term NAC followed by immediate RNU may not impede and potentially improves oncological outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8518523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85185232021-10-21 Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study Hamaya, Tomoko Hatakeyama, Shingo Tanaka, Toshikazu Kubota, Yuka Togashi, Kyo Hosogoe, Shogo Fujita, Naoki Kusaka, Ayumu Tokui, Noriko Okamoto, Teppei Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Tohru Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara BJU Int Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporal trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) utilisation and outcomes in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 289 patients from seven hospitals who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for locally advanced UTUC (≥cT3 or cN+) between 2000 and 2020. These patients received RNU alone or two to four courses of NAC with either a cisplatin‐ or carboplatin‐based regimen. We evaluated the temporal changes in NAC use and compared the visceral recurrence‐free, cancer‐specific, and overall survival rates. The effect of NAC on oncological outcomes was examined using multivariate Cox regression analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) models. RESULTS: Of 289 patients, 144 underwent NAC followed by RNU (NAC group) and 145 underwent RNU alone (Control [Ctrl] group). NAC use increased significantly from 19% (2006–2010), 58% (2011–2015), to 79% (2016–2020). Pathological downstaging was significantly higher in the NAC group than in the Ctrl group. The IPTW‐adjusted multivariable analyses showed that NAC significantly improved the oncological outcomes in the NAC group compared with the Ctrl group. Moreover, carboplatin‐based NAC significantly improved the oncological outcomes in the NAC group compared with the Ctrl group among patients with chronic kidney disease Stage ≥3. There were no significant differences in oncological outcomes between the cisplatin‐ and carboplatin‐based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NAC for high‐risk UTUC increased significantly after 2010. Platinum‐based short‐term NAC followed by immediate RNU may not impede and potentially improves oncological outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-15 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8518523/ /pubmed/33484231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15346 Text en © 2021 The Authors BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hamaya, Tomoko Hatakeyama, Shingo Tanaka, Toshikazu Kubota, Yuka Togashi, Kyo Hosogoe, Shogo Fujita, Naoki Kusaka, Ayumu Tokui, Noriko Okamoto, Teppei Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Tohru Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study |
title | Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study |
title_full | Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study |
title_short | Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study |
title_sort | trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes for high‐risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33484231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15346 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamayatomoko trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT hatakeyamashingo trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT tanakatoshikazu trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT kubotayuka trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT togashikyo trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT hosogoeshogo trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT fujitanaoki trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT kusakaayumu trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT tokuinoriko trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT okamototeppei trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT yamamotohayato trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT yoneyamatohru trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT yoneyamatakahiro trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT hashimotoyasuhiro trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy AT ohyamachikara trendsintheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapyandoncologicaloutcomesforhighriskuppertracturothelialcarcinomaamulticentreretrospectivestudy |