Cargando…

Performance of a targeted cell‐free DNA prenatal test for 22q11.2 deletion in a large clinical cohort

OBJECTIVE: 22q11.2 deletion is more common than trisomies 18 and 13 combined, yet no routine approach to prenatal screening for this microdeletion has been established. This study evaluated the clinical sensitivity and specificity of a targeted cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) test to screen for fetal 22q11.2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bevilacqua, E., Jani, J. C., Chaoui, R., Suk, E.‐K. A., Palma‐Dias, R., Ko, T.‐M., Warsof, S., Stokowski, R., Jones, K. J., Grati, F. R., Schmid, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34090308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.23699
_version_ 1784584245115617280
author Bevilacqua, E.
Jani, J. C.
Chaoui, R.
Suk, E.‐K. A.
Palma‐Dias, R.
Ko, T.‐M.
Warsof, S.
Stokowski, R.
Jones, K. J.
Grati, F. R.
Schmid, M.
author_facet Bevilacqua, E.
Jani, J. C.
Chaoui, R.
Suk, E.‐K. A.
Palma‐Dias, R.
Ko, T.‐M.
Warsof, S.
Stokowski, R.
Jones, K. J.
Grati, F. R.
Schmid, M.
author_sort Bevilacqua, E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: 22q11.2 deletion is more common than trisomies 18 and 13 combined, yet no routine approach to prenatal screening for this microdeletion has been established. This study evaluated the clinical sensitivity and specificity of a targeted cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) test to screen for fetal 22q11.2 deletion in a large cohort, using blinded analysis of prospectively enrolled pregnancies and stored clinical samples. METHODS: In order to ensure that the analysis included a meaningful number of cases with fetal 22q11.2 deletion, maternal plasma samples were obtained by prospective, multicenter enrolment of pregnancies with a fetal cardiac abnormality and from stored clinical samples from a research sample bank. Fetal genetic status, as evaluated by microarray analysis, karyotyping with fluorescence in‐situ hybridization or a comparable test, was available for all cases. Samples were processed as described previously for the Harmony prenatal test, with the addition of DANSR (Digital Analysis of Selected Regions) assays targeting the 3.0‐Mb region of 22q11.2 associated with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Operators were blinded to fetal genetic status. Sensitivity and specificity of the cfDNA test for 22q11.2 deletion were calculated based on concordance between the cfDNA result and fetal genotype. RESULTS: The final study group consisted of 735 clinical samples, including 358 from prospectively enrolled pregnancies and 377 stored clinical samples. Of 46 maternal plasma samples from pregnancies with a 22q11.2 deletion, ranging in size from 1.25 to 3.25 Mb, 32 had a cfDNA result indicating a high probability of 22q11.2 deletion (sensitivity, 69.6% (95% CI, 55.2–80.9%)). All 689 maternal plasma samples without a 22q11.2 deletion were classified correctly by the cfDNA test as having no evidence of a 22q11.2 deletion (specificity, 100% (95% CI, 99.5–100%)). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large‐scale prospective clinical evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of a targeted cfDNA test for fetal 22q11.2 deletion demonstrate that this test can detect the common and smaller, nested 22q11.2 deletions with a low (0–0.5%) false‐positive rate. Although the positive predictive value (PPV) observed in this study population was 100%, the expected PPV in the general pregnant population is estimated to be 12.2% at 99.5% specificity and 41.1% at 99.9% specificity. The use of this cfDNA test to screen for 22q11.2 deletion could enhance identification of pregnancies at risk for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome without significantly increasing the likelihood of maternal anxiety and unnecessary invasive procedures related to a false‐positive result. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8518527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85185272021-10-21 Performance of a targeted cell‐free DNA prenatal test for 22q11.2 deletion in a large clinical cohort Bevilacqua, E. Jani, J. C. Chaoui, R. Suk, E.‐K. A. Palma‐Dias, R. Ko, T.‐M. Warsof, S. Stokowski, R. Jones, K. J. Grati, F. R. Schmid, M. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Original Papers OBJECTIVE: 22q11.2 deletion is more common than trisomies 18 and 13 combined, yet no routine approach to prenatal screening for this microdeletion has been established. This study evaluated the clinical sensitivity and specificity of a targeted cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) test to screen for fetal 22q11.2 deletion in a large cohort, using blinded analysis of prospectively enrolled pregnancies and stored clinical samples. METHODS: In order to ensure that the analysis included a meaningful number of cases with fetal 22q11.2 deletion, maternal plasma samples were obtained by prospective, multicenter enrolment of pregnancies with a fetal cardiac abnormality and from stored clinical samples from a research sample bank. Fetal genetic status, as evaluated by microarray analysis, karyotyping with fluorescence in‐situ hybridization or a comparable test, was available for all cases. Samples were processed as described previously for the Harmony prenatal test, with the addition of DANSR (Digital Analysis of Selected Regions) assays targeting the 3.0‐Mb region of 22q11.2 associated with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Operators were blinded to fetal genetic status. Sensitivity and specificity of the cfDNA test for 22q11.2 deletion were calculated based on concordance between the cfDNA result and fetal genotype. RESULTS: The final study group consisted of 735 clinical samples, including 358 from prospectively enrolled pregnancies and 377 stored clinical samples. Of 46 maternal plasma samples from pregnancies with a 22q11.2 deletion, ranging in size from 1.25 to 3.25 Mb, 32 had a cfDNA result indicating a high probability of 22q11.2 deletion (sensitivity, 69.6% (95% CI, 55.2–80.9%)). All 689 maternal plasma samples without a 22q11.2 deletion were classified correctly by the cfDNA test as having no evidence of a 22q11.2 deletion (specificity, 100% (95% CI, 99.5–100%)). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large‐scale prospective clinical evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of a targeted cfDNA test for fetal 22q11.2 deletion demonstrate that this test can detect the common and smaller, nested 22q11.2 deletions with a low (0–0.5%) false‐positive rate. Although the positive predictive value (PPV) observed in this study population was 100%, the expected PPV in the general pregnant population is estimated to be 12.2% at 99.5% specificity and 41.1% at 99.9% specificity. The use of this cfDNA test to screen for 22q11.2 deletion could enhance identification of pregnancies at risk for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome without significantly increasing the likelihood of maternal anxiety and unnecessary invasive procedures related to a false‐positive result. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2021-10-01 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8518527/ /pubmed/34090308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.23699 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Bevilacqua, E.
Jani, J. C.
Chaoui, R.
Suk, E.‐K. A.
Palma‐Dias, R.
Ko, T.‐M.
Warsof, S.
Stokowski, R.
Jones, K. J.
Grati, F. R.
Schmid, M.
Performance of a targeted cell‐free DNA prenatal test for 22q11.2 deletion in a large clinical cohort
title Performance of a targeted cell‐free DNA prenatal test for 22q11.2 deletion in a large clinical cohort
title_full Performance of a targeted cell‐free DNA prenatal test for 22q11.2 deletion in a large clinical cohort
title_fullStr Performance of a targeted cell‐free DNA prenatal test for 22q11.2 deletion in a large clinical cohort
title_full_unstemmed Performance of a targeted cell‐free DNA prenatal test for 22q11.2 deletion in a large clinical cohort
title_short Performance of a targeted cell‐free DNA prenatal test for 22q11.2 deletion in a large clinical cohort
title_sort performance of a targeted cell‐free dna prenatal test for 22q11.2 deletion in a large clinical cohort
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34090308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.23699
work_keys_str_mv AT bevilacquae performanceofatargetedcellfreednaprenataltestfor22q112deletioninalargeclinicalcohort
AT janijc performanceofatargetedcellfreednaprenataltestfor22q112deletioninalargeclinicalcohort
AT chaouir performanceofatargetedcellfreednaprenataltestfor22q112deletioninalargeclinicalcohort
AT sukeka performanceofatargetedcellfreednaprenataltestfor22q112deletioninalargeclinicalcohort
AT palmadiasr performanceofatargetedcellfreednaprenataltestfor22q112deletioninalargeclinicalcohort
AT kotm performanceofatargetedcellfreednaprenataltestfor22q112deletioninalargeclinicalcohort
AT warsofs performanceofatargetedcellfreednaprenataltestfor22q112deletioninalargeclinicalcohort
AT stokowskir performanceofatargetedcellfreednaprenataltestfor22q112deletioninalargeclinicalcohort
AT joneskj performanceofatargetedcellfreednaprenataltestfor22q112deletioninalargeclinicalcohort
AT gratifr performanceofatargetedcellfreednaprenataltestfor22q112deletioninalargeclinicalcohort
AT schmidm performanceofatargetedcellfreednaprenataltestfor22q112deletioninalargeclinicalcohort