Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/non-contrast CT compared with those of ultrasound (US)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for axillary lymph node (ALN) staging in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assi, Hazem I., Alameh, Ibrahim A., Khoury, Jessica, Bou Zerdan, Maroun, Akiki, Vanessa, Charafeddine, Maya, El Saheb, Ghida I., Sukhon, Fares, Sbaity, Eman, Baydoun, Serine, Shabb, Nina, Berjawi, Ghina, Haidar, Mohamad B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660301
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.740336
_version_ 1784584251171143680
author Assi, Hazem I.
Alameh, Ibrahim A.
Khoury, Jessica
Bou Zerdan, Maroun
Akiki, Vanessa
Charafeddine, Maya
El Saheb, Ghida I.
Sukhon, Fares
Sbaity, Eman
Baydoun, Serine
Shabb, Nina
Berjawi, Ghina
Haidar, Mohamad B.
author_facet Assi, Hazem I.
Alameh, Ibrahim A.
Khoury, Jessica
Bou Zerdan, Maroun
Akiki, Vanessa
Charafeddine, Maya
El Saheb, Ghida I.
Sukhon, Fares
Sbaity, Eman
Baydoun, Serine
Shabb, Nina
Berjawi, Ghina
Haidar, Mohamad B.
author_sort Assi, Hazem I.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/non-contrast CT compared with those of ultrasound (US)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for axillary lymph node (ALN) staging in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/non-contrast CT was performed in 268 women with breast cancer, as well as ALN dissection or sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. One hundred sixty-four patients underwent US-guided FNA in combination with (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The diagnostic performance of each modality was evaluated using histopathologic assessments as the reference standard. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were compared to evaluate the diagnostic ability of several imaging modalities. RESULTS: Axillary (18)F-FDG uptake was positive in 180 patients, and 125 patients had axillary metastases according to the final pathology obtained by ALN dissection and/or SLN dissection. Of the patients with positive (18)F-FDG uptake in the axilla, 21% had false-positive results, whereas 79% were truly positive. Eighty-eight patients had negative (18)F-FDG uptake in the axilla, among which 25% were false-negative. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 86.59% and a specificity of 63.46% in the assessment of ALN metastasis; on the other hand, US-guided FNA had a sensitivity of 91.67% and a specificity of 87.50%. The mean primary cancer size (p = 0.04) and tumor grade (p = 0.04) in combination were the only factors associated with the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detecting metastatic ALNs. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients was not significantly different from that of US-guided FNA. Combining (18)F-FDG PET/CT with US-guided FNA or SLN biopsy could improve the diagnostic performance compared to (18)F-FDG PET/CT alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8518554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85185542021-10-16 Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients Assi, Hazem I. Alameh, Ibrahim A. Khoury, Jessica Bou Zerdan, Maroun Akiki, Vanessa Charafeddine, Maya El Saheb, Ghida I. Sukhon, Fares Sbaity, Eman Baydoun, Serine Shabb, Nina Berjawi, Ghina Haidar, Mohamad B. Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/non-contrast CT compared with those of ultrasound (US)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for axillary lymph node (ALN) staging in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/non-contrast CT was performed in 268 women with breast cancer, as well as ALN dissection or sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. One hundred sixty-four patients underwent US-guided FNA in combination with (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The diagnostic performance of each modality was evaluated using histopathologic assessments as the reference standard. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were compared to evaluate the diagnostic ability of several imaging modalities. RESULTS: Axillary (18)F-FDG uptake was positive in 180 patients, and 125 patients had axillary metastases according to the final pathology obtained by ALN dissection and/or SLN dissection. Of the patients with positive (18)F-FDG uptake in the axilla, 21% had false-positive results, whereas 79% were truly positive. Eighty-eight patients had negative (18)F-FDG uptake in the axilla, among which 25% were false-negative. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 86.59% and a specificity of 63.46% in the assessment of ALN metastasis; on the other hand, US-guided FNA had a sensitivity of 91.67% and a specificity of 87.50%. The mean primary cancer size (p = 0.04) and tumor grade (p = 0.04) in combination were the only factors associated with the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detecting metastatic ALNs. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients was not significantly different from that of US-guided FNA. Combining (18)F-FDG PET/CT with US-guided FNA or SLN biopsy could improve the diagnostic performance compared to (18)F-FDG PET/CT alone. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8518554/ /pubmed/34660301 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.740336 Text en Copyright © 2021 Assi, Alameh, Khoury, Bou Zerdan, Akiki, Charafeddine, El Saheb, Sukhon, Sbaity, Baydoun, Shabb, Berjawi and Haidar https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Assi, Hazem I.
Alameh, Ibrahim A.
Khoury, Jessica
Bou Zerdan, Maroun
Akiki, Vanessa
Charafeddine, Maya
El Saheb, Ghida I.
Sukhon, Fares
Sbaity, Eman
Baydoun, Serine
Shabb, Nina
Berjawi, Ghina
Haidar, Mohamad B.
Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients
title Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients
title_full Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients
title_short Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients
title_sort diagnostic performance of fdg-pet/ct scan as compared to us-guided fna in prediction of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660301
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.740336
work_keys_str_mv AT assihazemi diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients
AT alamehibrahima diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients
AT khouryjessica diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients
AT bouzerdanmaroun diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients
AT akikivanessa diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients
AT charafeddinemaya diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients
AT elsahebghidai diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients
AT sukhonfares diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients
AT sbaityeman diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients
AT baydounserine diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients
AT shabbnina diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients
AT berjawighina diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients
AT haidarmohamadb diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients