Cargando…
Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/non-contrast CT compared with those of ultrasound (US)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for axillary lymph node (ALN) staging in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND ME...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660301 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.740336 |
_version_ | 1784584251171143680 |
---|---|
author | Assi, Hazem I. Alameh, Ibrahim A. Khoury, Jessica Bou Zerdan, Maroun Akiki, Vanessa Charafeddine, Maya El Saheb, Ghida I. Sukhon, Fares Sbaity, Eman Baydoun, Serine Shabb, Nina Berjawi, Ghina Haidar, Mohamad B. |
author_facet | Assi, Hazem I. Alameh, Ibrahim A. Khoury, Jessica Bou Zerdan, Maroun Akiki, Vanessa Charafeddine, Maya El Saheb, Ghida I. Sukhon, Fares Sbaity, Eman Baydoun, Serine Shabb, Nina Berjawi, Ghina Haidar, Mohamad B. |
author_sort | Assi, Hazem I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/non-contrast CT compared with those of ultrasound (US)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for axillary lymph node (ALN) staging in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/non-contrast CT was performed in 268 women with breast cancer, as well as ALN dissection or sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. One hundred sixty-four patients underwent US-guided FNA in combination with (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The diagnostic performance of each modality was evaluated using histopathologic assessments as the reference standard. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were compared to evaluate the diagnostic ability of several imaging modalities. RESULTS: Axillary (18)F-FDG uptake was positive in 180 patients, and 125 patients had axillary metastases according to the final pathology obtained by ALN dissection and/or SLN dissection. Of the patients with positive (18)F-FDG uptake in the axilla, 21% had false-positive results, whereas 79% were truly positive. Eighty-eight patients had negative (18)F-FDG uptake in the axilla, among which 25% were false-negative. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 86.59% and a specificity of 63.46% in the assessment of ALN metastasis; on the other hand, US-guided FNA had a sensitivity of 91.67% and a specificity of 87.50%. The mean primary cancer size (p = 0.04) and tumor grade (p = 0.04) in combination were the only factors associated with the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detecting metastatic ALNs. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients was not significantly different from that of US-guided FNA. Combining (18)F-FDG PET/CT with US-guided FNA or SLN biopsy could improve the diagnostic performance compared to (18)F-FDG PET/CT alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8518554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85185542021-10-16 Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients Assi, Hazem I. Alameh, Ibrahim A. Khoury, Jessica Bou Zerdan, Maroun Akiki, Vanessa Charafeddine, Maya El Saheb, Ghida I. Sukhon, Fares Sbaity, Eman Baydoun, Serine Shabb, Nina Berjawi, Ghina Haidar, Mohamad B. Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/non-contrast CT compared with those of ultrasound (US)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for axillary lymph node (ALN) staging in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/non-contrast CT was performed in 268 women with breast cancer, as well as ALN dissection or sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. One hundred sixty-four patients underwent US-guided FNA in combination with (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The diagnostic performance of each modality was evaluated using histopathologic assessments as the reference standard. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were compared to evaluate the diagnostic ability of several imaging modalities. RESULTS: Axillary (18)F-FDG uptake was positive in 180 patients, and 125 patients had axillary metastases according to the final pathology obtained by ALN dissection and/or SLN dissection. Of the patients with positive (18)F-FDG uptake in the axilla, 21% had false-positive results, whereas 79% were truly positive. Eighty-eight patients had negative (18)F-FDG uptake in the axilla, among which 25% were false-negative. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 86.59% and a specificity of 63.46% in the assessment of ALN metastasis; on the other hand, US-guided FNA had a sensitivity of 91.67% and a specificity of 87.50%. The mean primary cancer size (p = 0.04) and tumor grade (p = 0.04) in combination were the only factors associated with the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detecting metastatic ALNs. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients was not significantly different from that of US-guided FNA. Combining (18)F-FDG PET/CT with US-guided FNA or SLN biopsy could improve the diagnostic performance compared to (18)F-FDG PET/CT alone. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8518554/ /pubmed/34660301 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.740336 Text en Copyright © 2021 Assi, Alameh, Khoury, Bou Zerdan, Akiki, Charafeddine, El Saheb, Sukhon, Sbaity, Baydoun, Shabb, Berjawi and Haidar https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Assi, Hazem I. Alameh, Ibrahim A. Khoury, Jessica Bou Zerdan, Maroun Akiki, Vanessa Charafeddine, Maya El Saheb, Ghida I. Sukhon, Fares Sbaity, Eman Baydoun, Serine Shabb, Nina Berjawi, Ghina Haidar, Mohamad B. Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients |
title | Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients |
title_full | Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients |
title_short | Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of fdg-pet/ct scan as compared to us-guided fna in prediction of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34660301 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.740336 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assihazemi diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients AT alamehibrahima diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients AT khouryjessica diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients AT bouzerdanmaroun diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients AT akikivanessa diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients AT charafeddinemaya diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients AT elsahebghidai diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients AT sukhonfares diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients AT sbaityeman diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients AT baydounserine diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients AT shabbnina diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients AT berjawighina diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients AT haidarmohamadb diagnosticperformanceoffdgpetctscanascomparedtousguidedfnainpredictionofaxillarylymphnodeinvolvementinbreastcancerpatients |