Cargando…
The perils of flawed science in wildlife trade literature
Despite broad scientific consensus that sustainable use of wildlife can enhance conservation efforts, ethical concerns have led some community groups to oppose use of wild animals. Voicing those concerns is legitimate, but underlying philosophical bias should not influence science‐based analysis and...
Autores principales: | Natusch, Daniel J. D., Aust, Patrick W., Shine, Richard |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13716 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Trump administration’s flawed decision on coronavirus vaccine injury compensation: recommendations for changes
por: Meyers, Peter H
Publicado: (2020) -
Pitfalls and perils of survival analysis under incorrect assumptions: the case of COVID-19 data
por: Piovani, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Integrating and updating wildlife conservation in China
por: Gong, Shiping, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Rethinking the study of human–wildlife coexistence
por: Pooley, Simon, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Why do we need a wildlife consumption ban in China?
por: Xiao, Lingyun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)