Cargando…
Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species
Many questions relevant to conservation decision‐making are characterized by extreme uncertainty due to lack of empirical data and complexity of the underlying ecologic processes, leading to a rapid increase in the use of structured protocols to elicit expert knowledge. Published ecologic applicatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13694 |
_version_ | 1784584281403686912 |
---|---|
author | Fitzgerald, Daniel B. Smith, David R. Culver, David C. Feller, Daniel Fong, Daniel W. Hajenga, Jeff Niemiller, Matthew L. Nolfi, Daniel C. Orndorff, Wil D. Douglas, Barbara Maloney, Kelly O. Young, John A. |
author_facet | Fitzgerald, Daniel B. Smith, David R. Culver, David C. Feller, Daniel Fong, Daniel W. Hajenga, Jeff Niemiller, Matthew L. Nolfi, Daniel C. Orndorff, Wil D. Douglas, Barbara Maloney, Kelly O. Young, John A. |
author_sort | Fitzgerald, Daniel B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many questions relevant to conservation decision‐making are characterized by extreme uncertainty due to lack of empirical data and complexity of the underlying ecologic processes, leading to a rapid increase in the use of structured protocols to elicit expert knowledge. Published ecologic applications often employ a modified Delphi method, where experts provide judgments anonymously and mathematical aggregation techniques are used to combine judgments. The Sheffield elicitation framework (SHELF) differs in its behavioral approach to synthesizing individual judgments into a fully specified probability distribution for an unknown quantity. We used the SHELF protocol remotely to assess extinction risk of three subterranean aquatic species that are being considered for listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. We provided experts an empirical threat assessment for each known locality over a video conference and recorded judgments on the probability of population persistence over four generations with online submission forms and R‐shiny apps available through the SHELF package. Despite large uncertainty for all populations, there were key differences between species’ risk of extirpation based on spatial variation in dominant threats, local land use and management practices, and species’ microhabitat. The resulting probability distributions provided decision makers with a full picture of uncertainty that was consistent with the probabilistic nature of risk assessments. Discussion among experts during SHELF's behavioral aggregation stage clearly documented dominant threats (e.g., development, timber harvest, animal agriculture, and cave visitation) and their interactions with local cave geology and species’ habitat. Our virtual implementation of the SHELF protocol demonstrated the flexibility of the approach for conservation applications operating on budgets and time lines that can limit in‐person meetings of geographically dispersed experts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8518685 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85186852021-10-21 Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species Fitzgerald, Daniel B. Smith, David R. Culver, David C. Feller, Daniel Fong, Daniel W. Hajenga, Jeff Niemiller, Matthew L. Nolfi, Daniel C. Orndorff, Wil D. Douglas, Barbara Maloney, Kelly O. Young, John A. Conserv Biol Contributed Papers Many questions relevant to conservation decision‐making are characterized by extreme uncertainty due to lack of empirical data and complexity of the underlying ecologic processes, leading to a rapid increase in the use of structured protocols to elicit expert knowledge. Published ecologic applications often employ a modified Delphi method, where experts provide judgments anonymously and mathematical aggregation techniques are used to combine judgments. The Sheffield elicitation framework (SHELF) differs in its behavioral approach to synthesizing individual judgments into a fully specified probability distribution for an unknown quantity. We used the SHELF protocol remotely to assess extinction risk of three subterranean aquatic species that are being considered for listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. We provided experts an empirical threat assessment for each known locality over a video conference and recorded judgments on the probability of population persistence over four generations with online submission forms and R‐shiny apps available through the SHELF package. Despite large uncertainty for all populations, there were key differences between species’ risk of extirpation based on spatial variation in dominant threats, local land use and management practices, and species’ microhabitat. The resulting probability distributions provided decision makers with a full picture of uncertainty that was consistent with the probabilistic nature of risk assessments. Discussion among experts during SHELF's behavioral aggregation stage clearly documented dominant threats (e.g., development, timber harvest, animal agriculture, and cave visitation) and their interactions with local cave geology and species’ habitat. Our virtual implementation of the SHELF protocol demonstrated the flexibility of the approach for conservation applications operating on budgets and time lines that can limit in‐person meetings of geographically dispersed experts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-16 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8518685/ /pubmed/33471375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13694 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Contributed Papers Fitzgerald, Daniel B. Smith, David R. Culver, David C. Feller, Daniel Fong, Daniel W. Hajenga, Jeff Niemiller, Matthew L. Nolfi, Daniel C. Orndorff, Wil D. Douglas, Barbara Maloney, Kelly O. Young, John A. Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species |
title | Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species |
title_full | Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species |
title_fullStr | Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species |
title_full_unstemmed | Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species |
title_short | Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species |
title_sort | using expert knowledge to support endangered species act decision‐making for data‐deficient species |
topic | Contributed Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fitzgeralddanielb usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies AT smithdavidr usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies AT culverdavidc usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies AT fellerdaniel usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies AT fongdanielw usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies AT hajengajeff usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies AT niemillermatthewl usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies AT nolfidanielc usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies AT orndorffwild usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies AT douglasbarbara usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies AT maloneykellyo usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies AT youngjohna usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies |