Cargando…

Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species

Many questions relevant to conservation decision‐making are characterized by extreme uncertainty due to lack of empirical data and complexity of the underlying ecologic processes, leading to a rapid increase in the use of structured protocols to elicit expert knowledge. Published ecologic applicatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fitzgerald, Daniel B., Smith, David R., Culver, David C., Feller, Daniel, Fong, Daniel W., Hajenga, Jeff, Niemiller, Matthew L., Nolfi, Daniel C., Orndorff, Wil D., Douglas, Barbara, Maloney, Kelly O., Young, John A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13694
_version_ 1784584281403686912
author Fitzgerald, Daniel B.
Smith, David R.
Culver, David C.
Feller, Daniel
Fong, Daniel W.
Hajenga, Jeff
Niemiller, Matthew L.
Nolfi, Daniel C.
Orndorff, Wil D.
Douglas, Barbara
Maloney, Kelly O.
Young, John A.
author_facet Fitzgerald, Daniel B.
Smith, David R.
Culver, David C.
Feller, Daniel
Fong, Daniel W.
Hajenga, Jeff
Niemiller, Matthew L.
Nolfi, Daniel C.
Orndorff, Wil D.
Douglas, Barbara
Maloney, Kelly O.
Young, John A.
author_sort Fitzgerald, Daniel B.
collection PubMed
description Many questions relevant to conservation decision‐making are characterized by extreme uncertainty due to lack of empirical data and complexity of the underlying ecologic processes, leading to a rapid increase in the use of structured protocols to elicit expert knowledge. Published ecologic applications often employ a modified Delphi method, where experts provide judgments anonymously and mathematical aggregation techniques are used to combine judgments. The Sheffield elicitation framework (SHELF) differs in its behavioral approach to synthesizing individual judgments into a fully specified probability distribution for an unknown quantity. We used the SHELF protocol remotely to assess extinction risk of three subterranean aquatic species that are being considered for listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. We provided experts an empirical threat assessment for each known locality over a video conference and recorded judgments on the probability of population persistence over four generations with online submission forms and R‐shiny apps available through the SHELF package. Despite large uncertainty for all populations, there were key differences between species’ risk of extirpation based on spatial variation in dominant threats, local land use and management practices, and species’ microhabitat. The resulting probability distributions provided decision makers with a full picture of uncertainty that was consistent with the probabilistic nature of risk assessments. Discussion among experts during SHELF's behavioral aggregation stage clearly documented dominant threats (e.g., development, timber harvest, animal agriculture, and cave visitation) and their interactions with local cave geology and species’ habitat. Our virtual implementation of the SHELF protocol demonstrated the flexibility of the approach for conservation applications operating on budgets and time lines that can limit in‐person meetings of geographically dispersed experts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8518685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85186852021-10-21 Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species Fitzgerald, Daniel B. Smith, David R. Culver, David C. Feller, Daniel Fong, Daniel W. Hajenga, Jeff Niemiller, Matthew L. Nolfi, Daniel C. Orndorff, Wil D. Douglas, Barbara Maloney, Kelly O. Young, John A. Conserv Biol Contributed Papers Many questions relevant to conservation decision‐making are characterized by extreme uncertainty due to lack of empirical data and complexity of the underlying ecologic processes, leading to a rapid increase in the use of structured protocols to elicit expert knowledge. Published ecologic applications often employ a modified Delphi method, where experts provide judgments anonymously and mathematical aggregation techniques are used to combine judgments. The Sheffield elicitation framework (SHELF) differs in its behavioral approach to synthesizing individual judgments into a fully specified probability distribution for an unknown quantity. We used the SHELF protocol remotely to assess extinction risk of three subterranean aquatic species that are being considered for listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. We provided experts an empirical threat assessment for each known locality over a video conference and recorded judgments on the probability of population persistence over four generations with online submission forms and R‐shiny apps available through the SHELF package. Despite large uncertainty for all populations, there were key differences between species’ risk of extirpation based on spatial variation in dominant threats, local land use and management practices, and species’ microhabitat. The resulting probability distributions provided decision makers with a full picture of uncertainty that was consistent with the probabilistic nature of risk assessments. Discussion among experts during SHELF's behavioral aggregation stage clearly documented dominant threats (e.g., development, timber harvest, animal agriculture, and cave visitation) and their interactions with local cave geology and species’ habitat. Our virtual implementation of the SHELF protocol demonstrated the flexibility of the approach for conservation applications operating on budgets and time lines that can limit in‐person meetings of geographically dispersed experts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-16 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8518685/ /pubmed/33471375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13694 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Contributed Papers
Fitzgerald, Daniel B.
Smith, David R.
Culver, David C.
Feller, Daniel
Fong, Daniel W.
Hajenga, Jeff
Niemiller, Matthew L.
Nolfi, Daniel C.
Orndorff, Wil D.
Douglas, Barbara
Maloney, Kelly O.
Young, John A.
Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species
title Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species
title_full Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species
title_fullStr Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species
title_full_unstemmed Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species
title_short Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision‐making for data‐deficient species
title_sort using expert knowledge to support endangered species act decision‐making for data‐deficient species
topic Contributed Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13694
work_keys_str_mv AT fitzgeralddanielb usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies
AT smithdavidr usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies
AT culverdavidc usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies
AT fellerdaniel usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies
AT fongdanielw usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies
AT hajengajeff usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies
AT niemillermatthewl usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies
AT nolfidanielc usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies
AT orndorffwild usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies
AT douglasbarbara usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies
AT maloneykellyo usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies
AT youngjohna usingexpertknowledgetosupportendangeredspeciesactdecisionmakingfordatadeficientspecies