Cargando…

Evaluation of a suggested novel method to adjust BMI calculated from self‐reported weight and height for measurement error

OBJECTIVE: In 2019, Ward et al. proposed a method to adjust BMI calculated from self‐reported weight and height for bias relative to measured data. They did not evaluate the adjusted values relative to measured BMI values for the same individuals. METHODS: A large data set (n = 37,439) with both mea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flegal, Katherine M., Graubard, Barry I., Ioannidis, John P. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.23239
_version_ 1784584285288660992
author Flegal, Katherine M.
Graubard, Barry I.
Ioannidis, John P. A.
author_facet Flegal, Katherine M.
Graubard, Barry I.
Ioannidis, John P. A.
author_sort Flegal, Katherine M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In 2019, Ward et al. proposed a method to adjust BMI calculated from self‐reported weight and height for bias relative to measured data. They did not evaluate the adjusted values relative to measured BMI values for the same individuals. METHODS: A large data set (n = 37,439) with both measured and self‐reported weight and height was randomly divided into two groups. The proposed method was used to adjust the BMI values in one group to the measured data from the other group. The adjusted values were then compared with the measured values for the same individuals. RESULTS: Before adjustment, 24.9% were incorrectly classified relative to measured BMI categories, including 7.9% in too high a category; after adjustment, 24.3% were incorrectly classified, with 12.8% in too high a category. The variance of the difference was unchanged. The adjustments reduced some errors and introduced new errors. At an individual level, results were unpredictable. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested method has little effect on misclassification, can introduce new errors, and could magnify errors associated with factors, such as age, race, educational level, or other characteristics. State‐level estimates and projections of obesity prevalence from values adjusted by this method may be incorrect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8518702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85187022021-10-21 Evaluation of a suggested novel method to adjust BMI calculated from self‐reported weight and height for measurement error Flegal, Katherine M. Graubard, Barry I. Ioannidis, John P. A. Obesity (Silver Spring) ORIGINAL ARTICLES OBJECTIVE: In 2019, Ward et al. proposed a method to adjust BMI calculated from self‐reported weight and height for bias relative to measured data. They did not evaluate the adjusted values relative to measured BMI values for the same individuals. METHODS: A large data set (n = 37,439) with both measured and self‐reported weight and height was randomly divided into two groups. The proposed method was used to adjust the BMI values in one group to the measured data from the other group. The adjusted values were then compared with the measured values for the same individuals. RESULTS: Before adjustment, 24.9% were incorrectly classified relative to measured BMI categories, including 7.9% in too high a category; after adjustment, 24.3% were incorrectly classified, with 12.8% in too high a category. The variance of the difference was unchanged. The adjustments reduced some errors and introduced new errors. At an individual level, results were unpredictable. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested method has little effect on misclassification, can introduce new errors, and could magnify errors associated with factors, such as age, race, educational level, or other characteristics. State‐level estimates and projections of obesity prevalence from values adjusted by this method may be incorrect. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-26 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8518702/ /pubmed/34448365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.23239 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Obesity published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Obesity Society (TOS) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Flegal, Katherine M.
Graubard, Barry I.
Ioannidis, John P. A.
Evaluation of a suggested novel method to adjust BMI calculated from self‐reported weight and height for measurement error
title Evaluation of a suggested novel method to adjust BMI calculated from self‐reported weight and height for measurement error
title_full Evaluation of a suggested novel method to adjust BMI calculated from self‐reported weight and height for measurement error
title_fullStr Evaluation of a suggested novel method to adjust BMI calculated from self‐reported weight and height for measurement error
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a suggested novel method to adjust BMI calculated from self‐reported weight and height for measurement error
title_short Evaluation of a suggested novel method to adjust BMI calculated from self‐reported weight and height for measurement error
title_sort evaluation of a suggested novel method to adjust bmi calculated from self‐reported weight and height for measurement error
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.23239
work_keys_str_mv AT flegalkatherinem evaluationofasuggestednovelmethodtoadjustbmicalculatedfromselfreportedweightandheightformeasurementerror
AT graubardbarryi evaluationofasuggestednovelmethodtoadjustbmicalculatedfromselfreportedweightandheightformeasurementerror
AT ioannidisjohnpa evaluationofasuggestednovelmethodtoadjustbmicalculatedfromselfreportedweightandheightformeasurementerror