Cargando…

Iatrogenic catheter‐induced ostial coronary artery dissections: Prevalence, management, and mortality from a cohort of 55,968 patients over 10 years

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the prevalence, management strategies and evaluate the prognosis of patients with iatrogenic catheter‐induced ostial coronary artery dissection (ICOCAD). BACKGROUND: ICOCAD is a rare but potentially devastating complication of cardiac catheterisation. The clinical ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramasamy, Anantharaman, Bajaj, Retesh, Jones, Daniel A, Amersey, Rajiv, Mathur, Anthony, Baumbach, Andreas, Bourantas, Christos V., O'Mahony, Constantinos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33241605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29382
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the prevalence, management strategies and evaluate the prognosis of patients with iatrogenic catheter‐induced ostial coronary artery dissection (ICOCAD). BACKGROUND: ICOCAD is a rare but potentially devastating complication of cardiac catheterisation. The clinical manifestations of ICOCAD vary from asymptomatic angiographic findings to abrupt vessel closure leading to myocardial infarction and death. METHODS: 55,968 patients who underwent coronary angiography over a 10‐year period were screened for ICOCAD as defined by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The management and all‐cause mortality were retrieved from local and national databases. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of ICOCAD was 0.09% (51/55,968 patients). Guide catheters accounted for 75% (n = 37) of cases. Half of the ICOCAD cases involved the right coronary artery while the remaining were related to left main stem (23/51; 45%) and left internal mammary artery (2/51; 4%). Two‐thirds of ICOCAD were high grade (type D, E, and F). The majority of cases were type F dissections (n = 18; 66%), of which two third occurred in females in their 60s. The majority of ICOCAD patients (42/51; 82%) were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention while the remaining underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (3/51; 6%) or managed conservatively (6/51; 12%). Three deaths occurred during the index admission while 48/51 patients (94.1%) were safely discharged without further mortality over a median follow‐up of 3.6 years. CONCLUSIONS: ICOCAD is a rare but life‐threatening complication of coronary angiography. Timely recognition and prompt bailout PCI is a safe option for majority of patients with good clinical outcomes.