Cargando…

Smoke or smokeless moxibustion treatment for breech presentation: A three‐arm pilot trial

AIMS: We conducted a pilot trial to compare the effects of smoke and smokeless moxibustion with a control as a possible supplement to external cephalic version (ECV) for converting breech to cephalic presentation and increasing adherence to cephalic position, and to assess their effects on the well‐...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Higashihara, Akiko, Horiuchi, Shigeko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33999503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12426
_version_ 1784584321529544704
author Higashihara, Akiko
Horiuchi, Shigeko
author_facet Higashihara, Akiko
Horiuchi, Shigeko
author_sort Higashihara, Akiko
collection PubMed
description AIMS: We conducted a pilot trial to compare the effects of smoke and smokeless moxibustion with a control as a possible supplement to external cephalic version (ECV) for converting breech to cephalic presentation and increasing adherence to cephalic position, and to assess their effects on the well‐being of the mother and child. METHODS: We used a quasi‐experimental design with 3 arms: a smoke moxibustion (SM) (n = 20) and smokeless moxibustion (SLM) (n = 20) groups (20‐min acupoint BL67 stimulation once or twice daily for 10–14 days), and a control group (n = 20). The participants had singleton breech presentations between 33 and 35 gestation weeks. The primary outcome was cephalic presentation at the conclusion of intervention. The secondary outcomes were cephalic presentation at birth and effects on mother and child well‐being. RESULTS: At the conclusion of intervention, cephalic presentation was higher in the SLM (60.0%) than the control groups (25.0%), Relative Risk 2.40, 95% Confidence Interval [1.04–5.56]; there was no significant difference for SM. At birth, there were no significant differences in cephalic presentation or well‐being. CONCLUSION: SLM treatment showed an increasing trend towards cephalic presentation at the conclusion of intervention. Although significant differences were not observed at birth possibly due to the small samples and non‐randomization, moxibustion was safe, and not associated with perinatal morbidity and mortality. A randomized controlled trial with a larger sample is warranted to ascertain SLM treatment as a possible ECV supplement for converting and increasing adherence to cephalic position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8518843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85188432021-10-21 Smoke or smokeless moxibustion treatment for breech presentation: A three‐arm pilot trial Higashihara, Akiko Horiuchi, Shigeko Jpn J Nurs Sci Original Articles AIMS: We conducted a pilot trial to compare the effects of smoke and smokeless moxibustion with a control as a possible supplement to external cephalic version (ECV) for converting breech to cephalic presentation and increasing adherence to cephalic position, and to assess their effects on the well‐being of the mother and child. METHODS: We used a quasi‐experimental design with 3 arms: a smoke moxibustion (SM) (n = 20) and smokeless moxibustion (SLM) (n = 20) groups (20‐min acupoint BL67 stimulation once or twice daily for 10–14 days), and a control group (n = 20). The participants had singleton breech presentations between 33 and 35 gestation weeks. The primary outcome was cephalic presentation at the conclusion of intervention. The secondary outcomes were cephalic presentation at birth and effects on mother and child well‐being. RESULTS: At the conclusion of intervention, cephalic presentation was higher in the SLM (60.0%) than the control groups (25.0%), Relative Risk 2.40, 95% Confidence Interval [1.04–5.56]; there was no significant difference for SM. At birth, there were no significant differences in cephalic presentation or well‐being. CONCLUSION: SLM treatment showed an increasing trend towards cephalic presentation at the conclusion of intervention. Although significant differences were not observed at birth possibly due to the small samples and non‐randomization, moxibustion was safe, and not associated with perinatal morbidity and mortality. A randomized controlled trial with a larger sample is warranted to ascertain SLM treatment as a possible ECV supplement for converting and increasing adherence to cephalic position. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-05-17 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8518843/ /pubmed/33999503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12426 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Japan Journal of Nursing Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Academy of Nursing Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Higashihara, Akiko
Horiuchi, Shigeko
Smoke or smokeless moxibustion treatment for breech presentation: A three‐arm pilot trial
title Smoke or smokeless moxibustion treatment for breech presentation: A three‐arm pilot trial
title_full Smoke or smokeless moxibustion treatment for breech presentation: A three‐arm pilot trial
title_fullStr Smoke or smokeless moxibustion treatment for breech presentation: A three‐arm pilot trial
title_full_unstemmed Smoke or smokeless moxibustion treatment for breech presentation: A three‐arm pilot trial
title_short Smoke or smokeless moxibustion treatment for breech presentation: A three‐arm pilot trial
title_sort smoke or smokeless moxibustion treatment for breech presentation: a three‐arm pilot trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33999503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12426
work_keys_str_mv AT higashiharaakiko smokeorsmokelessmoxibustiontreatmentforbreechpresentationathreearmpilottrial
AT horiuchishigeko smokeorsmokelessmoxibustiontreatmentforbreechpresentationathreearmpilottrial