Cargando…

Impact of sertraline daily treatment regimen on adherence, persistence and healthcare resource utilisation in patients with major depressive disorder or obsessive‐compulsive disorder: A real‐world evidence analysis from the United States

OBJECTIVE: To generate real‐world evidence (RWE) from the United States to assess the impact of pill burden and the importance of achieving a stable daily dose of sertraline (time taken, number of dose adjustments needed) on adherence/persistence and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU). METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Gang, Si, Tianmei, Imperato, Joseph S., Yang, LiLi, Zou, Kelly H., Jin, Ying Olive, Pappadopulos, Elizabeth A., Yan, Lei, Li, Jim Z., Yu, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34120397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14522
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To generate real‐world evidence (RWE) from the United States to assess the impact of pill burden and the importance of achieving a stable daily dose of sertraline (time taken, number of dose adjustments needed) on adherence/persistence and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the PharMetrics(®) Plus database (1 October 2012 to 31 March 2020) in the United States. Eligible patients had major depressive disorder (MDD) or obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) and ≥1 claim for sertraline during index period (1 April 2013 to 31 March 2019, allowing 6‐months prior, 1‐year post‐index follow‐up). Patients who achieved stable daily dose of sertraline (>90 days on same dose) were categorised into five cohorts, depending on pill burden/daily dose: Cohort (1): 1 × 50 mg/d; Cohort (2): 1 × 100 mg/d; Cohort (3): 2 × 50 mg/d; Cohort (4): 1.5 × 100 mg/d; Cohort (5): 3 × 50 mg/d. Impact of pill burden on adherence/persistence and HCRU was assessed among cohorts using logistic regression analysis, and between patients who did vs did not stabilise on therapy. P < .05 was considered significant for all analyses. RESULTS: Of 224 412 eligible patients, 108 729 stabilised on sertraline (50, 100 or 150 mg/d) and formed Cohorts 1‐5. Stabilised patients on lower pill burden had statistically higher adherence and were more likely to remain persistent throughout 1‐year post‐index period vs patients on higher pill burden but same overall dose (100 mg/d [Cohort 2 vs 3] and 150 mg/d [Cohort 4 vs 5], respectively). Patients who did not stabilise had significantly lower adherence/persistence vs patients who achieved stable daily dose (Cohorts 1‐5 combined). Persistence improved when stable daily dose was achieved quickly (within 1‐4 months) and efficiently (within 1‐3 dose adjustments). Probability of HCRU increased for patients who did not stabilise on their initial prescription. CONCLUSION: Simplifying treatment regimen and decreasing pill burden improved adherence and/or persistence with sertraline therapy (100 or 150 mg/d). Patients achieving stable daily dose of sertraline in an efficient and timely manner were more likely to remain persistent throughout 1‐year follow‐up.