Cargando…
Identifying options for oncology therapy regimen codification to improve standardization—combined results of an expert panel and a review
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Chemotherapy drugs are often administered in combinations with predefined interdependent doses and cycle intervals. As yet, there is no global standardization system to describe these complex regimens in a universally comprehensive manner. The aim of this review is to id...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33687085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13402 |
_version_ | 1784584344827854848 |
---|---|
author | Terkola, Robert Bardin, Christophe Lizeaga Cundin, Garbiñe Zeinab, Nadine Crul, Mirjam |
author_facet | Terkola, Robert Bardin, Christophe Lizeaga Cundin, Garbiñe Zeinab, Nadine Crul, Mirjam |
author_sort | Terkola, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Chemotherapy drugs are often administered in combinations with predefined interdependent doses and cycle intervals. As yet, there is no global standardization system to describe these complex regimens in a universally comprehensive manner. The aim of this review is to identify which efforts for standardization have been undertaken and which recommendations for databases and nomenclature of chemotherapy regimens are available. METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify all peer‐reviewed full‐text articles about oncology therapy regimen codification. In addition, the results of this search were evaluated and consensus recommendations from a European expert panel were subsequently added. RESULTS: This review gives an overview of attempts to standardize chemotherapy nomenclature described in the literature, as well as of previously published identified gaps in regimen codification. In addition, we summarized the suggestions for improvement of chemotherapy codification found in the available literature, combining them with the expertise from a European expert panel of oncology pharmacists. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: We believe that one of the most important error‐prevention measures is standardization. However, there is a paucity of data how it may be achieved. Currently available data suggest that standardization has a positive impact on usability for data networks, prescription software, safety and the measurement of the quality of cancer care delivery. Standardization is also a strong pre‐requisite for all discussions including oncology pharmacists and oncologists when evaluating chemotherapy regimen in countries in Europe but also all over the world. The recommendations compiled in this review can help to support overdue standardization efforts in this important therapeutic area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8518942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85189422021-10-21 Identifying options for oncology therapy regimen codification to improve standardization—combined results of an expert panel and a review Terkola, Robert Bardin, Christophe Lizeaga Cundin, Garbiñe Zeinab, Nadine Crul, Mirjam J Clin Pharm Ther Review Articles WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Chemotherapy drugs are often administered in combinations with predefined interdependent doses and cycle intervals. As yet, there is no global standardization system to describe these complex regimens in a universally comprehensive manner. The aim of this review is to identify which efforts for standardization have been undertaken and which recommendations for databases and nomenclature of chemotherapy regimens are available. METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify all peer‐reviewed full‐text articles about oncology therapy regimen codification. In addition, the results of this search were evaluated and consensus recommendations from a European expert panel were subsequently added. RESULTS: This review gives an overview of attempts to standardize chemotherapy nomenclature described in the literature, as well as of previously published identified gaps in regimen codification. In addition, we summarized the suggestions for improvement of chemotherapy codification found in the available literature, combining them with the expertise from a European expert panel of oncology pharmacists. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: We believe that one of the most important error‐prevention measures is standardization. However, there is a paucity of data how it may be achieved. Currently available data suggest that standardization has a positive impact on usability for data networks, prescription software, safety and the measurement of the quality of cancer care delivery. Standardization is also a strong pre‐requisite for all discussions including oncology pharmacists and oncologists when evaluating chemotherapy regimen in countries in Europe but also all over the world. The recommendations compiled in this review can help to support overdue standardization efforts in this important therapeutic area. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-09 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8518942/ /pubmed/33687085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13402 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Terkola, Robert Bardin, Christophe Lizeaga Cundin, Garbiñe Zeinab, Nadine Crul, Mirjam Identifying options for oncology therapy regimen codification to improve standardization—combined results of an expert panel and a review |
title | Identifying options for oncology therapy regimen codification to improve standardization—combined results of an expert panel and a review |
title_full | Identifying options for oncology therapy regimen codification to improve standardization—combined results of an expert panel and a review |
title_fullStr | Identifying options for oncology therapy regimen codification to improve standardization—combined results of an expert panel and a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying options for oncology therapy regimen codification to improve standardization—combined results of an expert panel and a review |
title_short | Identifying options for oncology therapy regimen codification to improve standardization—combined results of an expert panel and a review |
title_sort | identifying options for oncology therapy regimen codification to improve standardization—combined results of an expert panel and a review |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8518942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33687085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13402 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terkolarobert identifyingoptionsforoncologytherapyregimencodificationtoimprovestandardizationcombinedresultsofanexpertpanelandareview AT bardinchristophe identifyingoptionsforoncologytherapyregimencodificationtoimprovestandardizationcombinedresultsofanexpertpanelandareview AT lizeagacundingarbine identifyingoptionsforoncologytherapyregimencodificationtoimprovestandardizationcombinedresultsofanexpertpanelandareview AT zeinabnadine identifyingoptionsforoncologytherapyregimencodificationtoimprovestandardizationcombinedresultsofanexpertpanelandareview AT crulmirjam identifyingoptionsforoncologytherapyregimencodificationtoimprovestandardizationcombinedresultsofanexpertpanelandareview |