Cargando…

Hematological and Genetic Markers in the Rational Approach to Patients With HCV Sustained Virological Response With or Without Persisting Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) usually lead to improvement/remission of cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV), although symptoms may persist/recur after a sustained virological response (SVR). We evaluated hematological and genetic markers in patients with HCV‐SVR vasculitis with an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gragnani, Laura, Lorini, Serena, Marri, Silvia, Basile, Umberto, Santarlasci, Veronica, Monti, Monica, Madia, Francesco, Petraccia, Luisa, Stasi, Cristina, Marello, Niccolò, Napodano, Cecilia, Annunziato, Francesco, Zignego, Anna Linda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33721342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.31804
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) usually lead to improvement/remission of cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV), although symptoms may persist/recur after a sustained virological response (SVR). We evaluated hematological and genetic markers in patients with HCV‐SVR vasculitis with and without persisting/recurring symptoms to early predict the CV outcome. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Ninety‐eight patients with HCV‐CV were prospectively enrolled after a DAA‐induced SVR: Group A: 52 with complete clinical response; Group B: 46 with symptom maintenance/recurrence. Monoclonal B‐cell lymphocytosis, t(14;18) translocation, and abnormal free light chains κ/λ ratios were detected by flow cytometry or nested‐PCR or nephelometry in 4% Group A versus 17% Group B (P = 0.04) patients, 17% Group A versus 40% Group B patients (P = 0.02), and 17% Group A versus 47% Group B (P = 0.003) patients, respectively. At least 1 out of 3 clonality markers was altered/positive in 29% of Group A versus 70% of Group B patients (P < 0.0001). When available, pretherapy samples were also tested for t(14;18) translocation (detected in 12/37 [32%] Group A and 21/38 [55%] Group B) and κ/λ ratios (abnormal in 5/35 [14%] Group A and 20/38 [53%] Group B) (P = 0.0006), whereas at least one clonality marker was detected/altered in 16/37 (43%) Group A and 30/38 (79%) Group B (P = 0.002). CV‐associated single‐nucleotide polymorphisms were tested by real‐time PCR. Among them, notch4 rs2071286 T minor allele and TT genotype showed a higher frequency in Group B versus Group A (46% vs. 29%, P = 0.01, and 17% vs. 2%, P = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Hematological or genetic analyses could be used to foresee the CV clinical response after DAA therapy and could be valuable to assess a rational flowchart to manage CV during follow‐up.