Exploring blast composition in myelodysplastic syndromes and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms: CD45RA and CD371 improve diagnostic value of flow cytometry through assessment of myeloblast heterogeneity and stem cell aberrancy

BACKGROUND: Flow cytometry immunophenotyping (FCIP) can improve diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), although its application is challenging due to difficulties in standardization, complexity of antibody panels and subjective interp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shameli, Afshin, Dharmani‐Khan, Poonam, Luider, Joanne, Auer, Iwona, Shabani‐Rad, Meer‐Taher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Original Articles
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33369070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21983
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Flow cytometry immunophenotyping (FCIP) can improve diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), although its application is challenging due to difficulties in standardization, complexity of antibody panels and subjective interpretation of data. Since blasts are invariably affected in these disorders, we developed a FCIP approach for detailed and objective analysis of the blast population. METHODS: FCIP using a one‐tube 10‐color (13‐marker) antibody panel was performed on bone marrow samples from 23 MDS and 8 MDS/MPN patients, 21 cytopenic patients non‐diagnostic for MDS (Non‐MDS), and 16 Control samples. RESULTS: MDS and MDS/MPN cases demonstrated one to several immunophenotypic abnormalities including: increased myeloblasts, decreased stage‐1 hematogones, aberrant stem cells, abnormal myeloblast heterogeneity/divergence from normal, increased or decreased CD45 intensity, increased CD117 or CD123 intensity, decreased CD38 intensity, and aberrant expression of lineage markers (CD5, CD19, CD56). A Blast score was developed that showed sensitivity of 80.6% and specificity of 90.5% for immunophenotypic diagnosis of MDS and MDS/MPN. Expression levels of CD45RA and CD371 were used to evaluate abnormal myeloblast heterogeneity and stem cell aberrancy. Both these features were, for the first time, incorporated into a scoring system and resulted in 19% increase in the sensitivity of the assay for lower‐risk MDS. CONCLUSION: Deep immunophenotypic analysis of the blast population is valuable for diagnosis of MDS and MDS/MPN and can potentially provide sensitivity and specificity figures comparable to those previously described using more comprehensive panels that assess maturing myelomonocytic and erythroid elements in addition to progenitor cells.

Ejemplares similares