Cargando…

A masked, randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab compared to saline control in client‐owned dogs with allergic dermatitis

BACKGROUND: Interleukin (IL)‐31 is an important mediator in canine atopic dermatitis (cAD) and also may be dysregulated in other allergic diseases. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab (canine anti‐IL‐31 monoclonal antibody) for treatment of pruritus associated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Brussel, Leen, Moyaert, Hilde, Escalada, Monica, Mahabir, Sean P., Stegemann, Michael R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34180084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vde.12984
_version_ 1784584372356120576
author Van Brussel, Leen
Moyaert, Hilde
Escalada, Monica
Mahabir, Sean P.
Stegemann, Michael R.
author_facet Van Brussel, Leen
Moyaert, Hilde
Escalada, Monica
Mahabir, Sean P.
Stegemann, Michael R.
author_sort Van Brussel, Leen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interleukin (IL)‐31 is an important mediator in canine atopic dermatitis (cAD) and also may be dysregulated in other allergic diseases. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab (canine anti‐IL‐31 monoclonal antibody) for treatment of pruritus associated with allergic dermatitis in dogs. ANIMALS: Dogs that were at least moderately pruritic with a presumptive diagnosis of allergic dermatitis were enrolled in Portugal, Hungary, France and Germany by 12 primary care practitioners and two veterinary dermatology referral specialists. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dogs were randomised to receive either placebo (saline) or lokivetmab (1.0–3.3 mg/kg) by subcutaneous injection on Day (D)0. Owners evaluated pruritus using a validated Visual Analog Scale (pVAS) daily until D7 and then weekly until D28. The severity of dermatitis was assessed by the investigators using a modified VAS on D0, D7, D14 and D28. RESULTS: Beginning at D1, owner‐assessed pVAS least square means were significantly reduced in the treatment group versus the placebo group (57.7% versus 21.8% reduction on D28). For all time points, investigator‐assessed VAS means were significantly reduced in the lokivetmab group versus the placebo group (57.1% versus 20.5% reduction on D28). Overall, the occurrence of adverse health events during the evaluation period was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Lokivetmab is a safe and efficacious treatment for dogs with allergic dermatitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8519066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85190662021-10-21 A masked, randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab compared to saline control in client‐owned dogs with allergic dermatitis Van Brussel, Leen Moyaert, Hilde Escalada, Monica Mahabir, Sean P. Stegemann, Michael R. Vet Dermatol Hypersensitivity Disorders BACKGROUND: Interleukin (IL)‐31 is an important mediator in canine atopic dermatitis (cAD) and also may be dysregulated in other allergic diseases. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab (canine anti‐IL‐31 monoclonal antibody) for treatment of pruritus associated with allergic dermatitis in dogs. ANIMALS: Dogs that were at least moderately pruritic with a presumptive diagnosis of allergic dermatitis were enrolled in Portugal, Hungary, France and Germany by 12 primary care practitioners and two veterinary dermatology referral specialists. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dogs were randomised to receive either placebo (saline) or lokivetmab (1.0–3.3 mg/kg) by subcutaneous injection on Day (D)0. Owners evaluated pruritus using a validated Visual Analog Scale (pVAS) daily until D7 and then weekly until D28. The severity of dermatitis was assessed by the investigators using a modified VAS on D0, D7, D14 and D28. RESULTS: Beginning at D1, owner‐assessed pVAS least square means were significantly reduced in the treatment group versus the placebo group (57.7% versus 21.8% reduction on D28). For all time points, investigator‐assessed VAS means were significantly reduced in the lokivetmab group versus the placebo group (57.1% versus 20.5% reduction on D28). Overall, the occurrence of adverse health events during the evaluation period was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Lokivetmab is a safe and efficacious treatment for dogs with allergic dermatitis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-27 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8519066/ /pubmed/34180084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vde.12984 Text en © 2021 Zoetis. Veterinary Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Veterinary Dermatology and The American College of Veterinary Dermatology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Hypersensitivity Disorders
Van Brussel, Leen
Moyaert, Hilde
Escalada, Monica
Mahabir, Sean P.
Stegemann, Michael R.
A masked, randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab compared to saline control in client‐owned dogs with allergic dermatitis
title A masked, randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab compared to saline control in client‐owned dogs with allergic dermatitis
title_full A masked, randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab compared to saline control in client‐owned dogs with allergic dermatitis
title_fullStr A masked, randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab compared to saline control in client‐owned dogs with allergic dermatitis
title_full_unstemmed A masked, randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab compared to saline control in client‐owned dogs with allergic dermatitis
title_short A masked, randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab compared to saline control in client‐owned dogs with allergic dermatitis
title_sort masked, randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab compared to saline control in client‐owned dogs with allergic dermatitis
topic Hypersensitivity Disorders
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34180084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vde.12984
work_keys_str_mv AT vanbrusselleen amaskedrandomisedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyoflokivetmabcomparedtosalinecontrolinclientowneddogswithallergicdermatitis
AT moyaerthilde amaskedrandomisedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyoflokivetmabcomparedtosalinecontrolinclientowneddogswithallergicdermatitis
AT escaladamonica amaskedrandomisedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyoflokivetmabcomparedtosalinecontrolinclientowneddogswithallergicdermatitis
AT mahabirseanp amaskedrandomisedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyoflokivetmabcomparedtosalinecontrolinclientowneddogswithallergicdermatitis
AT stegemannmichaelr amaskedrandomisedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyoflokivetmabcomparedtosalinecontrolinclientowneddogswithallergicdermatitis
AT vanbrusselleen maskedrandomisedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyoflokivetmabcomparedtosalinecontrolinclientowneddogswithallergicdermatitis
AT moyaerthilde maskedrandomisedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyoflokivetmabcomparedtosalinecontrolinclientowneddogswithallergicdermatitis
AT escaladamonica maskedrandomisedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyoflokivetmabcomparedtosalinecontrolinclientowneddogswithallergicdermatitis
AT mahabirseanp maskedrandomisedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyoflokivetmabcomparedtosalinecontrolinclientowneddogswithallergicdermatitis
AT stegemannmichaelr maskedrandomisedclinicaltrialevaluatingtheefficacyandsafetyoflokivetmabcomparedtosalinecontrolinclientowneddogswithallergicdermatitis