Cargando…

What makes a molecule a pre‐ or a post‐herbicide – how valuable are physicochemical parameters for their design?

Pre‐emergence herbicides are taken up by seeds before germination and by roots, hypocotyls, cotyledons, coleoptiles or leaves before emergence, whereas post‐emergence herbicides are taken up primarily by foliage and stems. Most modern pre‐emergence herbicides are lipophilic, but post‐emergence herbi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krähmer, Hansjörg, Walter, Helmut, Jeschke, Peter, Haaf, Klaus, Baur, Peter, Evans, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34176232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.6535
_version_ 1784584380694396928
author Krähmer, Hansjörg
Walter, Helmut
Jeschke, Peter
Haaf, Klaus
Baur, Peter
Evans, Richard
author_facet Krähmer, Hansjörg
Walter, Helmut
Jeschke, Peter
Haaf, Klaus
Baur, Peter
Evans, Richard
author_sort Krähmer, Hansjörg
collection PubMed
description Pre‐emergence herbicides are taken up by seeds before germination and by roots, hypocotyls, cotyledons, coleoptiles or leaves before emergence, whereas post‐emergence herbicides are taken up primarily by foliage and stems. Most modern pre‐emergence herbicides are lipophilic, but post‐emergence herbicides may be lipophilic or hydrophilic. The metabolic conversion of herbicides to inactive or active metabolites after plant uptake is of major importance for some compound classes. Several herbicides are proherbicides as for example some acetyl‐coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase)‐inhibitors. The physicochemical characteristics of proherbicides and herbicides are usually unrelated. A major role can be attributed to the site of action at a cellular level. A great number of herbicides such as photosystem II (PS II)‐inhibitors, protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)‐inhibitors or carotenoid biosynthesis inhibitors require light for activity. Others, such as cellulose‐biosynthesis and mitotic inhibitors seem to be primarily active in belowground organs. Several lipophilic barriers against the uptake of xenobiotics exist in aboveground and belowground plant parts. The relevance of these barriers needs, however, further clarification. Uptake and translocation models are valuable tools for the explanation of the potential movement of compounds. Many factors other than uptake and translocation have, however, to be considered for the design of herbicides. For post‐emergence herbicides, ultraviolet (UV) light stability, stability in formulations, and mixability with other agrochemicals have to be kept in mind while, in addition to the aforementioned factors soil interaction plays a major role for pre‐emergence herbicides. In our opinion, general physicochemical characteristics of pre‐ or post‐emergence herbicides do, unfortunately not exist yet. © 2021 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8519102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85191022021-10-22 What makes a molecule a pre‐ or a post‐herbicide – how valuable are physicochemical parameters for their design? Krähmer, Hansjörg Walter, Helmut Jeschke, Peter Haaf, Klaus Baur, Peter Evans, Richard Pest Manag Sci Reviews Pre‐emergence herbicides are taken up by seeds before germination and by roots, hypocotyls, cotyledons, coleoptiles or leaves before emergence, whereas post‐emergence herbicides are taken up primarily by foliage and stems. Most modern pre‐emergence herbicides are lipophilic, but post‐emergence herbicides may be lipophilic or hydrophilic. The metabolic conversion of herbicides to inactive or active metabolites after plant uptake is of major importance for some compound classes. Several herbicides are proherbicides as for example some acetyl‐coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase)‐inhibitors. The physicochemical characteristics of proherbicides and herbicides are usually unrelated. A major role can be attributed to the site of action at a cellular level. A great number of herbicides such as photosystem II (PS II)‐inhibitors, protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)‐inhibitors or carotenoid biosynthesis inhibitors require light for activity. Others, such as cellulose‐biosynthesis and mitotic inhibitors seem to be primarily active in belowground organs. Several lipophilic barriers against the uptake of xenobiotics exist in aboveground and belowground plant parts. The relevance of these barriers needs, however, further clarification. Uptake and translocation models are valuable tools for the explanation of the potential movement of compounds. Many factors other than uptake and translocation have, however, to be considered for the design of herbicides. For post‐emergence herbicides, ultraviolet (UV) light stability, stability in formulations, and mixability with other agrochemicals have to be kept in mind while, in addition to the aforementioned factors soil interaction plays a major role for pre‐emergence herbicides. In our opinion, general physicochemical characteristics of pre‐ or post‐emergence herbicides do, unfortunately not exist yet. © 2021 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2021-07-19 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8519102/ /pubmed/34176232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.6535 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Krähmer, Hansjörg
Walter, Helmut
Jeschke, Peter
Haaf, Klaus
Baur, Peter
Evans, Richard
What makes a molecule a pre‐ or a post‐herbicide – how valuable are physicochemical parameters for their design?
title What makes a molecule a pre‐ or a post‐herbicide – how valuable are physicochemical parameters for their design?
title_full What makes a molecule a pre‐ or a post‐herbicide – how valuable are physicochemical parameters for their design?
title_fullStr What makes a molecule a pre‐ or a post‐herbicide – how valuable are physicochemical parameters for their design?
title_full_unstemmed What makes a molecule a pre‐ or a post‐herbicide – how valuable are physicochemical parameters for their design?
title_short What makes a molecule a pre‐ or a post‐herbicide – how valuable are physicochemical parameters for their design?
title_sort what makes a molecule a pre‐ or a post‐herbicide – how valuable are physicochemical parameters for their design?
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34176232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.6535
work_keys_str_mv AT krahmerhansjorg whatmakesamoleculeapreorapostherbicidehowvaluablearephysicochemicalparametersfortheirdesign
AT walterhelmut whatmakesamoleculeapreorapostherbicidehowvaluablearephysicochemicalparametersfortheirdesign
AT jeschkepeter whatmakesamoleculeapreorapostherbicidehowvaluablearephysicochemicalparametersfortheirdesign
AT haafklaus whatmakesamoleculeapreorapostherbicidehowvaluablearephysicochemicalparametersfortheirdesign
AT baurpeter whatmakesamoleculeapreorapostherbicidehowvaluablearephysicochemicalparametersfortheirdesign
AT evansrichard whatmakesamoleculeapreorapostherbicidehowvaluablearephysicochemicalparametersfortheirdesign