Cargando…

Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application

Biological insurance theory predicts that, in a variable environment, aggregate ecosystem properties will vary less in more diverse communities because declines in the performance or abundance of some species or phenotypes will be offset, at least partly, by smoother declines or increases in others....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loreau, Michel, Barbier, Matthieu, Filotas, Elise, Gravel, Dominique, Isbell, Forest, Miller, Steve J., Montoya, Jose M., Wang, Shaopeng, Aussenac, Raphaël, Germain, Rachel, Thompson, Patrick L., Gonzalez, Andrew, Dee, Laura E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34080283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12756
_version_ 1784584389788696576
author Loreau, Michel
Barbier, Matthieu
Filotas, Elise
Gravel, Dominique
Isbell, Forest
Miller, Steve J.
Montoya, Jose M.
Wang, Shaopeng
Aussenac, Raphaël
Germain, Rachel
Thompson, Patrick L.
Gonzalez, Andrew
Dee, Laura E.
author_facet Loreau, Michel
Barbier, Matthieu
Filotas, Elise
Gravel, Dominique
Isbell, Forest
Miller, Steve J.
Montoya, Jose M.
Wang, Shaopeng
Aussenac, Raphaël
Germain, Rachel
Thompson, Patrick L.
Gonzalez, Andrew
Dee, Laura E.
author_sort Loreau, Michel
collection PubMed
description Biological insurance theory predicts that, in a variable environment, aggregate ecosystem properties will vary less in more diverse communities because declines in the performance or abundance of some species or phenotypes will be offset, at least partly, by smoother declines or increases in others. During the past two decades, ecology has accumulated strong evidence for the stabilising effect of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning. As biological insurance is reaching the stage of a mature theory, it is critical to revisit and clarify its conceptual foundations to guide future developments, applications and measurements. In this review, we first clarify the connections between the insurance and portfolio concepts that have been used in ecology and the economic concepts that inspired them. Doing so points to gaps and mismatches between ecology and economics that could be filled profitably by new theoretical developments and new management applications. Second, we discuss some fundamental issues in biological insurance theory that have remained unnoticed so far and that emerge from some of its recent applications. In particular, we draw a clear distinction between the two effects embedded in biological insurance theory, i.e. the effects of biodiversity on the mean and variability of ecosystem properties. This distinction allows explicit consideration of trade‐offs between the mean and stability of ecosystem processes and services. We also review applications of biological insurance theory in ecosystem management. Finally, we provide a synthetic conceptual framework that unifies the various approaches across disciplines, and we suggest new ways in which biological insurance theory could be extended to address new issues in ecology and ecosystem management. Exciting future challenges include linking the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning and stability, incorporating multiple functions and feedbacks, developing new approaches to partition biodiversity effects across scales, extending biological insurance theory to complex interaction networks, and developing new applications to biodiversity and ecosystem management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8519139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85191392021-10-22 Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application Loreau, Michel Barbier, Matthieu Filotas, Elise Gravel, Dominique Isbell, Forest Miller, Steve J. Montoya, Jose M. Wang, Shaopeng Aussenac, Raphaël Germain, Rachel Thompson, Patrick L. Gonzalez, Andrew Dee, Laura E. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc Original Articles Biological insurance theory predicts that, in a variable environment, aggregate ecosystem properties will vary less in more diverse communities because declines in the performance or abundance of some species or phenotypes will be offset, at least partly, by smoother declines or increases in others. During the past two decades, ecology has accumulated strong evidence for the stabilising effect of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning. As biological insurance is reaching the stage of a mature theory, it is critical to revisit and clarify its conceptual foundations to guide future developments, applications and measurements. In this review, we first clarify the connections between the insurance and portfolio concepts that have been used in ecology and the economic concepts that inspired them. Doing so points to gaps and mismatches between ecology and economics that could be filled profitably by new theoretical developments and new management applications. Second, we discuss some fundamental issues in biological insurance theory that have remained unnoticed so far and that emerge from some of its recent applications. In particular, we draw a clear distinction between the two effects embedded in biological insurance theory, i.e. the effects of biodiversity on the mean and variability of ecosystem properties. This distinction allows explicit consideration of trade‐offs between the mean and stability of ecosystem processes and services. We also review applications of biological insurance theory in ecosystem management. Finally, we provide a synthetic conceptual framework that unifies the various approaches across disciplines, and we suggest new ways in which biological insurance theory could be extended to address new issues in ecology and ecosystem management. Exciting future challenges include linking the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning and stability, incorporating multiple functions and feedbacks, developing new approaches to partition biodiversity effects across scales, extending biological insurance theory to complex interaction networks, and developing new applications to biodiversity and ecosystem management. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-06-02 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8519139/ /pubmed/34080283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12756 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Loreau, Michel
Barbier, Matthieu
Filotas, Elise
Gravel, Dominique
Isbell, Forest
Miller, Steve J.
Montoya, Jose M.
Wang, Shaopeng
Aussenac, Raphaël
Germain, Rachel
Thompson, Patrick L.
Gonzalez, Andrew
Dee, Laura E.
Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application
title Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application
title_full Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application
title_fullStr Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application
title_full_unstemmed Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application
title_short Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application
title_sort biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34080283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12756
work_keys_str_mv AT loreaumichel biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication
AT barbiermatthieu biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication
AT filotaselise biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication
AT graveldominique biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication
AT isbellforest biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication
AT millerstevej biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication
AT montoyajosem biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication
AT wangshaopeng biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication
AT aussenacraphael biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication
AT germainrachel biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication
AT thompsonpatrickl biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication
AT gonzalezandrew biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication
AT deelaurae biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication