Cargando…
Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application
Biological insurance theory predicts that, in a variable environment, aggregate ecosystem properties will vary less in more diverse communities because declines in the performance or abundance of some species or phenotypes will be offset, at least partly, by smoother declines or increases in others....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34080283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12756 |
_version_ | 1784584389788696576 |
---|---|
author | Loreau, Michel Barbier, Matthieu Filotas, Elise Gravel, Dominique Isbell, Forest Miller, Steve J. Montoya, Jose M. Wang, Shaopeng Aussenac, Raphaël Germain, Rachel Thompson, Patrick L. Gonzalez, Andrew Dee, Laura E. |
author_facet | Loreau, Michel Barbier, Matthieu Filotas, Elise Gravel, Dominique Isbell, Forest Miller, Steve J. Montoya, Jose M. Wang, Shaopeng Aussenac, Raphaël Germain, Rachel Thompson, Patrick L. Gonzalez, Andrew Dee, Laura E. |
author_sort | Loreau, Michel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biological insurance theory predicts that, in a variable environment, aggregate ecosystem properties will vary less in more diverse communities because declines in the performance or abundance of some species or phenotypes will be offset, at least partly, by smoother declines or increases in others. During the past two decades, ecology has accumulated strong evidence for the stabilising effect of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning. As biological insurance is reaching the stage of a mature theory, it is critical to revisit and clarify its conceptual foundations to guide future developments, applications and measurements. In this review, we first clarify the connections between the insurance and portfolio concepts that have been used in ecology and the economic concepts that inspired them. Doing so points to gaps and mismatches between ecology and economics that could be filled profitably by new theoretical developments and new management applications. Second, we discuss some fundamental issues in biological insurance theory that have remained unnoticed so far and that emerge from some of its recent applications. In particular, we draw a clear distinction between the two effects embedded in biological insurance theory, i.e. the effects of biodiversity on the mean and variability of ecosystem properties. This distinction allows explicit consideration of trade‐offs between the mean and stability of ecosystem processes and services. We also review applications of biological insurance theory in ecosystem management. Finally, we provide a synthetic conceptual framework that unifies the various approaches across disciplines, and we suggest new ways in which biological insurance theory could be extended to address new issues in ecology and ecosystem management. Exciting future challenges include linking the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning and stability, incorporating multiple functions and feedbacks, developing new approaches to partition biodiversity effects across scales, extending biological insurance theory to complex interaction networks, and developing new applications to biodiversity and ecosystem management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8519139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85191392021-10-22 Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application Loreau, Michel Barbier, Matthieu Filotas, Elise Gravel, Dominique Isbell, Forest Miller, Steve J. Montoya, Jose M. Wang, Shaopeng Aussenac, Raphaël Germain, Rachel Thompson, Patrick L. Gonzalez, Andrew Dee, Laura E. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc Original Articles Biological insurance theory predicts that, in a variable environment, aggregate ecosystem properties will vary less in more diverse communities because declines in the performance or abundance of some species or phenotypes will be offset, at least partly, by smoother declines or increases in others. During the past two decades, ecology has accumulated strong evidence for the stabilising effect of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning. As biological insurance is reaching the stage of a mature theory, it is critical to revisit and clarify its conceptual foundations to guide future developments, applications and measurements. In this review, we first clarify the connections between the insurance and portfolio concepts that have been used in ecology and the economic concepts that inspired them. Doing so points to gaps and mismatches between ecology and economics that could be filled profitably by new theoretical developments and new management applications. Second, we discuss some fundamental issues in biological insurance theory that have remained unnoticed so far and that emerge from some of its recent applications. In particular, we draw a clear distinction between the two effects embedded in biological insurance theory, i.e. the effects of biodiversity on the mean and variability of ecosystem properties. This distinction allows explicit consideration of trade‐offs between the mean and stability of ecosystem processes and services. We also review applications of biological insurance theory in ecosystem management. Finally, we provide a synthetic conceptual framework that unifies the various approaches across disciplines, and we suggest new ways in which biological insurance theory could be extended to address new issues in ecology and ecosystem management. Exciting future challenges include linking the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning and stability, incorporating multiple functions and feedbacks, developing new approaches to partition biodiversity effects across scales, extending biological insurance theory to complex interaction networks, and developing new applications to biodiversity and ecosystem management. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-06-02 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8519139/ /pubmed/34080283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12756 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Loreau, Michel Barbier, Matthieu Filotas, Elise Gravel, Dominique Isbell, Forest Miller, Steve J. Montoya, Jose M. Wang, Shaopeng Aussenac, Raphaël Germain, Rachel Thompson, Patrick L. Gonzalez, Andrew Dee, Laura E. Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application |
title | Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application |
title_full | Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application |
title_fullStr | Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application |
title_full_unstemmed | Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application |
title_short | Biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application |
title_sort | biodiversity as insurance: from concept to measurement and application |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8519139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34080283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12756 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loreaumichel biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication AT barbiermatthieu biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication AT filotaselise biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication AT graveldominique biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication AT isbellforest biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication AT millerstevej biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication AT montoyajosem biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication AT wangshaopeng biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication AT aussenacraphael biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication AT germainrachel biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication AT thompsonpatrickl biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication AT gonzalezandrew biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication AT deelaurae biodiversityasinsurancefromconcepttomeasurementandapplication |